Overview
Title
To amend the National Marine Sanctuaries Act to prohibit requiring an authorization for the installation, continued presence, operation, maintenance, repair, or recovery of undersea fiber optic cables in a national marine sanctuary if such activities have previously been authorized by a Federal or State agency.
ELI5 AI
The bill is like a rule that says if someone wants to lay or fix undersea cables (like internet wires) in special ocean areas, they don't need to ask for new permission if they've already got a thumbs up from another important government group. It wants to make things quicker and easier but might mean the ocean isn't checked as much to see if it's okay.
Summary AI
H. R. 261, also known as the “Undersea Cable Protection Act of 2025,” aims to change the rules governing undersea fiber optic cables within national marine sanctuaries. Specifically, it prohibits the Secretary from requiring additional approvals for activities like the installation or maintenance of these cables if they have already been authorized by a Federal or State agency. This bill encourages cooperation between the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and other federal agencies when dealing with these cables. The purpose is to streamline the regulatory process by recognizing prior authorizations.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The proposed legislation, introduced in the House of Representatives, aims to amend the National Marine Sanctuaries Act. Its primary objective is to remove the need for further federal authorizations for the installation, continued presence, operation, maintenance, repair, or recovery of undersea fiber optic cables in national marine sanctuaries, provided these activities have already been approved by a Federal or State agency. Referred to as the "Undersea Cable Protection Act of 2025," it also encourages interagency cooperation but limits additional federal oversight once initial permissions are granted.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several key issues emerge from the proposed bill. Firstly, the bill limits federal oversight, potentially permitting undersea fiber optic cables to operate in sensitive marine environments without further evaluation, despite possibly changing environmental conditions. It also lacks explicit directives for environmental assessments as preconditions for such permissions, raising concerns about overlooking potential detrimental impacts on marine ecosystems.
Furthermore, the bill's language allows existing permits to override any other relevant environmental legislation or protections. This could create conflicts with broader environmental preservation efforts and reduce the ability to respond to new ecological data or changing conditions. Finally, the complexity of the bill's language in detailing multiple activities related to the fiber optic cables could result in misunderstandings or misapplications of its provisions.
Impact on the Public
The broader public interest may be impacted by this bill, particularly in terms of environmental conservation and technology infrastructure. National marine sanctuaries are valued for their role in preserving marine biodiversity and ecosystems. This legislation could lead to reduced protections, potentially affecting tourism, fishing industries, and scientific research that depend on healthy marine environments.
In contrast, expanding undersea cable networks could improve internet connectivity and accessibility, supporting economic and personal communications advancements. The balance between environmental health and technological infrastructure development is central to public concerns regarding this bill.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
The bill may benefit telecommunications companies and technology sectors. By removing additional bureaucratic steps, companies could reduce costs and administrative burdens, facilitating quicker and more efficient deployment of undersea cable networks. This streamlining could enhance connectivity and economic opportunities, especially in regions reliant on these infrastructures.
Conversely, environmental groups and marine conservation advocates might view the bill negatively due to its potential to weaken environmental safeguards for marine sanctuaries. Similarly, local communities and industries dependent on healthy marine ecosystems might express concerns about long-term ecological impacts that could outweigh short-term technological or economic gains.
In summary, while the bill could streamline processes for technological growth, it raises significant environmental concerns that need addressing to balance innovation with ecological preservation. The implications for the public and specific stakeholders highlight the importance of careful consideration and possible integration of additional environmental safeguards within the legislative framework.
Issues
The bill limits oversight by prohibiting the requirement of additional authorizations for undersea fiber optic cables if they have already been authorized by a Federal or State agency, potentially leading to insufficient regulation and oversight in national marine sanctuaries. This is addressed in Sections 2 and 310A.
There is no mention of environmental assessment requirements or impact studies as a prerequisite for authorizations, which could lead to overlooking significant environmental ramifications. This concern is noted in Sections 2 and 310A.
The bill may prioritize entities that have already obtained licenses or permits without allowing for reassessment based on changing environmental conditions, reducing the ability to protect marine sanctuaries. This issue is relevant to Sections 2 and 310A.
The provision to disregard other parts of the Act ("Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act") may conflict with existing environmental protections and other important legislative objectives, as noted in Section 310A.
The lack of stated criteria or checks for assessing the appropriateness of previously issued licenses may result in continued operations in sensitive areas without adequate review, as identified in Section 310A.
The bill does not provide guidance on interagency cooperation standards, which could lead to inconsistent implementation, as mentioned in Section 310A.
The complex language involving multiple activities (installation, continued presence, operation, maintenance, repair, or recovery) without clear distinction of terms might cause confusion in interpreting the bill's mandates, as described in Section 310A.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act provides its official short title, which is the “Undersea Cable Protection Act of 2025.”
2. Prohibition on requiring authorizations for undersea fiber optic cables previously authorized by Federal or State agencies Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The new section of the National Marine Sanctuaries Act states that the Secretary cannot block or demand approval for undersea fiber optic cables in national marine sanctuaries if they have already been approved by federal or state agencies. It also allows the Secretary to request collaboration between the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and other federal agencies in activities involving these cables.
310A. Prohibition on requiring authorizations for undersea fiber optic cables previously authorized by Federal or State agencies Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section prohibits the Secretary from blocking or requiring new approvals for undersea fiber optic cables in national marine sanctuaries if they have already been authorized by a Federal or State agency. It also allows the Secretary to direct the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to cooperate with other agencies regarding these cables.