Overview
Title
To amend part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to provide full Federal funding of such part.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 2598 wants to help schools better support kids with disabilities by giving them more money from the government every year, but it uses some tricky math and doesn't clearly explain how to check if the money is spent right.
Summary AI
H.R. 2598, known as the "IDEA Full Funding Act," proposes to amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to provide full federal funding for certain parts of the Act, ensuring improved financial support for special education. The bill outlines specific funding levels annually from 2026 through 2035 and beyond, based on the number of children with disabilities receiving special education services and the average spending per student in public schools. It sets provisions for how these funds are to be appropriated and used, tying increases in funding to the number of eligible children and overall educational expenditures. Additionally, the bill mandates that expenditures align with budget "cut-as-you-go" principles to offset the costs.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The legislation marked as H. R. 2598, proposed during the 119th Congress, is titled the "IDEA Full Funding Act." Its primary objective is to amend Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) to ensure full federal funding for its mandates. The bill details funding amounts for the fiscal years 2026 through 2035 and outlines a formula for determining these amounts based on the number of children with disabilities and average per-pupil expenditures in U.S. public schools. It additionally requires that funds adhere to certain financial rules that dictate offsets for expenditures.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the main issues within the bill lies in Section 2, where the complexity of funding allocations could lead to misunderstandings. The intricate calculation method involving fixed dollar amounts or percentages can be challenging for stakeholders to interpret clearly. This complexity risks affecting how resources are allocated to individuals with disabilities. Furthermore, while the bill specifies funding through 2035, it omits details on how funding should adjust to future economic conditions or demographic changes. This lack of foresight may hinder financial planning and the sustainability of funding over the long term.
In Section 3, the term "cut-as-you-go requirements" is not defined, creating room for varied interpretations and possible misuse of funds. This ambiguity concerning fiscal responsibility and transparency is troubling, as it could impact accountability and effective fund utilization without clear guidelines. Additionally, the absence of oversight measures further exacerbates potential concerns about ensuring funds align properly with the objectives of the IDEA.
Public Impact
Broadly, the IDEA Full Funding Act aims to bring significant benefits to individuals with disabilities by promising full federal funding for their education needs. This move could enhance educational services and resources, leading to a potentially positive shift in the educational landscape for disabled students. The public at large might see this as a progressive step towards inclusivity and equal opportunity in education, aligning with broader societal values.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For individuals with disabilities and their advocates, this bill, if enacted, promises increased federal funds dedicated to improving special education programs, thereby addressing long-standing concerns about underfunding. Educators and schools stand to benefit as well, with potentially greater resources and support for special education, allowing them to provide a more robust educational experience for their students.
However, the bill's complexities and lack of clarity pose challenges that could negatively impact stakeholders. School administrators might face difficulties in planning and budgeting due to ambiguous funding specifications and calculation methods. Additionally, state and local education agencies could struggle with compliance and funding allocation without clear definitions and oversight measures, risking inefficient use of the increased resources.
Overall, while the IDEA Full Funding Act aspires to solidify support for special education, its effectiveness will heavily rely on clarifying the current ambiguities and addressing the potential issues identified in the funding calculations and accountability mechanisms.
Financial Assessment
The bill H.R. 2598, titled the "IDEA Full Funding Act," proposes significant federal funding allocations to support special education under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). This commentary will explore the financial references within the bill, focusing on how funding is structured and addressing related issues.
Summary of Financial Allocations
The bill outlines a progressive increase in funding starting in the fiscal year 2026, with specific funding targets set for each subsequent year through 2035 and beyond. For fiscal year 2026, the bill authorizes $16,661,928,000 or 11.6% of a specified calculation, whichever amount is greater, and appropriates $6,425,048,000 or 4.5% of the same calculation for use. These allocations are designed to become available on July 1 and remain available through September 30 of the following year.
Funding amounts incrementally increase over time, with notable figures being $31,462,786,000 or 20.2% for fiscal year 2030, and $50,681,693,000 or 30.4% for fiscal year 2033. By fiscal year 2035, the allocation is set at $69,644,540,000 or 40.0%, aiming to maintain this level for each subsequent fiscal year, ensuring sustained financial support.
Complexity in Funding Calculations
One concern with these financial standards lies in the complexity of Section 2's funding allocations. The bill specifies funding as either fixed dollar amounts or percentages from a larger, calculated figure. This complexity might lead to confusion and impede consistent understanding among stakeholders, as it involves nuanced, multi-step calculations that lack immediate clarity. For example, the phrase "11.6% of the amount determined under paragraph (2)" lacks transparency, as the total amount baseline it refers to is not directly stated.
Absence of Economic Adjustments Post-2035
The bill provides specific financial plans only until 2035. Beyond that, there are no details provided about accounting for economic variances such as inflation or demographic changes like increasing numbers of children who require special education services. Without these details, planning for long-term adequacy and financial sustainability becomes challenging. As economic conditions evolve, static funding in real terms could limit the effectiveness and reach of IDEA's support.
Oversight and Accountability Concerns
Section 3 refers to expenditures aligning with unidentified "cut-as-you-go requirements," with no detailed explanation provided. This lack of clarity may lead to varied interpretations, potentially affecting fund utilization. Additionally, the absence of stated oversight mechanisms raises concerns about ensuring that funds are spent according to the IDEA’s objectives and under proper accountability measures. The potential for misuse or misallocation of these significant funds remains a point of concern if oversight measures are not clarified.
In summary, while the IDEA Full Funding Act proposes substantial federal support to advance special education, the complexity and lack of detailed economic and accountability frameworks warrant consideration to ensure clarity, transparency, and fiscal responsibility.
Issues
The bill's language in Section 2 concerning funding allocations is potentially complex and may lead to misunderstandings. It specifies fixed dollar amounts or percentages of a total amount determined by a multi-step calculation, which lacks immediate clarity and transparency for the public. The complexity might hinder consistent interpretation by stakeholders, possibly affecting the accurate allocation of resources to individuals with disabilities.
In Section 3, the absence of a definition or detailed description of 'cut-as-you-go requirements' leaves room for varied interpretations and could result in the potential misuse of funds. This lack of clarity may raise concerns about fiscal responsibility and transparency regarding offsets and funding accountability in terms of how appropriated funds are utilized.
Section 1 only provides the short title of the Act and does not elaborate on the purpose, scope, or specific implications. This insufficiency in detail may lead to challenges in understanding the full extent of the Act's impact, particularly for stakeholders interested in the funding and its intended benefits for individuals with disabilities.
Although Section 2 provides funding specifications until 2035, it lacks details on adjusting these amounts for future economic conditions or changes in the number of children with disabilities or average per-pupil expenditures beyond 2035. This could pose financial planning challenges and raise concerns about the long-term adequacy and sustainability of funding under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Section 3 also omits oversight or accountability measures to ensure proper and effective use of funds, potentially leading to concerns about ensuring that funds are aligned with the objectives of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and that spending is conducted in accordance with the Act's requirements.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act states that it can be officially referred to as the "IDEA Full Funding Act."
2. Mandatory funding of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates funding for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act by specifying the amounts authorized and appropriated for each fiscal year from 2026 to 2035 and beyond. It also outlines a formula to determine those amounts based on the number of children with disabilities receiving special education and the average per-pupil expenditure in U.S. public schools.
Money References
- Section 611(i) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1411(i)) is amended to read as follows: “(i) Funding.— “(1) IN GENERAL.—For the purpose of carrying out this part, other than section 619, there are authorized to be appropriated— “(A) $16,661,928,000 or 11.6 percent of the amount determined under paragraph (2), whichever is greater, for fiscal year 2026, and there are hereby appropriated $6,425,048,000 or 4.5 percent of the amount determined under paragraph (2), whichever is greater, for fiscal year 2026, which shall become available for obligation on July 1, 2026, and shall remain available through September 30, 2027; “(B) $19,531,844,000 or 13.4 percent of the amount determined under paragraph (2), whichever is greater, for fiscal year 2027, and there are hereby appropriated $8,372,932,000 or 5.7 percent of the amount determined under paragraph (2), whichever is greater, for fiscal year 2027, which shall become available for obligation on July 1, 2027, and shall remain available through September 30, 2028; “(C) $22,896,084,000 or 15.3 percent of the amount determined under paragraph (2), whichever is greater, for fiscal year 2028, and there are hereby appropriated $10,911,357,000 or 7.3 percent of the amount determined under paragraph (2), whichever is greater, for fiscal year 2028, which shall become available for obligation on July 1, 2028, and shall remain available through September 30, 2029; “(D) $26,839,795,000 or 17.6 percent of the amount determined under paragraph (2), whichever is greater, for fiscal year 2029, and there are hereby appropriated $14,219,357,000 or 9.3 percent of the amount determined under paragraph (2), whichever is greater, for fiscal year 2029, which shall become available for obligation on July 1, 2029, and shall remain available through September 30, 2030; “(E) $31,462,786,000 or 20.2 percent of the amount determined under paragraph (2), whichever is greater, for fiscal year 2030, and there are hereby appropriated $18,530,244,000 or 11.9 percent of the amount determined under paragraph (2), whichever is greater, for fiscal year 2030, which shall become available for obligation on July 1, 2030, and shall remain available through September 30, 2031; “(F) $36,882,058,000 or 23.1 percent of the amount determined under paragraph (2), whichever is greater, for fiscal year 2031, and there are hereby appropriated $24,148,064,000 or 15.2 percent of the amount determined under paragraph (2), whichever is greater, for fiscal year 2031, which shall become available for obligation on July 1, 2031, and shall remain available through September 30, 2032; “(G) $43,234,768,000 or 26.5 percent of the amount determined under paragraph (2), whichever is greater, for fiscal year 2032, and there are hereby appropriated $31,469,041,000 or 19.3 percent of the amount determined under paragraph (2), whichever is greater, for fiscal year 2032, which shall become available for obligation on July 1, 2032, and shall remain available through September 30, 2033; “(H) $50,681,693,000 or 30.4 percent of the amount determined under paragraph (2), whichever is greater, for fiscal year 2033, and there are hereby appropriated $41,009,521,000 or 24.6 percent of the amount determined under paragraph (2), whichever is greater, for fiscal year 2033, which shall become available for obligation on July 1, 2033, and shall remain available through September 30, 2034; “(I) $59,411,305,000 or 34.9 percent of the amount determined under paragraph (2), whichever is greater, for fiscal year 2034, and there are hereby appropriated $53,442,392,000 or 31.4 percent of the amount determined under paragraph (2), whichever is greater, for fiscal year 2034, which shall become available for obligation on July 1, 2034, and shall remain available through September 30, 2035; and “(J) $69,644,540,000 or 40.0 percent of the amount determined under paragraph (2), whichever is greater, for fiscal year 2035 and each subsequent fiscal year, and there are hereby appropriated $69,644,540,000 or 40.0 percent of the amount determined under paragraph (2), whichever is greater, for fiscal year 2035 and each subsequent fiscal year, which— “(i) shall become available for obligation with respect to fiscal year 2035 on July 1, 2035, and shall remain available through September 30, 2036; and “(ii) shall become available for obligation with respect to each subsequent fiscal year on July 1 of that fiscal year and shall remain available through September 30 of the succeeding fiscal year.
3. Offsets Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The third section specifies that funds allocated under a particular part of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act must be used following a rule that requires financial offsets whenever expenditures are made.