Overview

Title

To designate certain organizations as foreign terrorist organizations.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 2581 wants to label some groups as "bad guys" to keep people safe, and it asks the government to decide if these groups should be punished, but doing this might take a lot of work and time.

Summary AI

H. R. 2581, titled the "Iranian Terror Prevention Act," aims to officially label certain organizations as foreign terrorist organizations (FTOs). The bill requires the Secretary of State to designate specific groups, including Abu Fadl al-Abbas Brigades and Harakat Hezbollah al-Nujaba, as FTOs. It also instructs the President to decide whether to impose sanctions on these organizations and any affiliated entities within a specific timeframe. Further, it mandates regular reports to Congress on new entities that may qualify for such designations or sanctions.

Published

2025-04-01
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-04-01
Package ID: BILLS-119hr2581ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
1,128
Pages:
6
Sentences:
53

Language

Nouns: 423
Verbs: 46
Adjectives: 28
Adverbs: 9
Numbers: 55
Entities: 128

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.66
Average Sentence Length:
21.28
Token Entropy:
4.84
Readability (ARI):
9.11

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, known as the "Iranian Terror Prevention Act," mandates the United States Secretary of State to designate certain organizations as foreign terrorist organizations (FTOs). This must be completed within 90 days after the bill's enactment. Additionally, it empowers the President to determine whether sanctions should be imposed on these organizations within 60 days of the bill's enactment. These sanctions would be in alignment with existing executive orders aimed at blocking property and prohibiting transactions with individuals or groups associated with terrorism. The Act also includes a requirement for regular reporting to Congress, ensuring ongoing assessment and communication regarding entities that could be considered for similar designations or sanctions.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several issues have been raised concerning the bill's implementation and potential effectiveness:

  1. Resource and Administrative Challenges: The rapid 90-day deadline for designating numerous organizations as FTOs may stretch administrative resources significantly, leading to potential inefficiencies.

  2. Sanction Decision Pressures: The President is required to provide a detailed explanation if sanctions are not imposed, which could result in political pressure and lacks clear criteria for such decisions.

  3. Regular Reporting Burden: The mandate for reports every 180 days may become cumbersome and potentially unnecessary if there are no significant changes or new information regularly available.

  4. Ambiguity in Affiliation Determinations: There is considerable complexity in identifying affiliations with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), raising potential enforcement and legal challenges.

  5. Vague Sanction Criteria: The criteria for imposing sanctions within the 60-day timeframe could be seen as vague, leading to inconsistent interpretations and applications.

  6. Title Clarity: The bill's title, "Iranian Terror Prevention Act," might benefit from clarification to prevent ambiguity concerning the definition of "terror" within this legislative framework.

Potential Public and Stakeholder Impacts

Broadly, this legislation could affect international relations and domestic security measures. By designating groups as FTOs and imposing sanctions, the United States could reinforce its stance against organizations it deems linked to terrorism, potentially enhancing national security. However, these actions may also influence diplomatic relations and international collaborations, particularly with countries involved in or connected to the listed entities.

For specific stakeholders, including affected organizations and countries, the consequences could be profound. Organizations designated as FTOs would face legal barriers that inhibit their operational capabilities, greatly impacting their funding and network. Countries with closer associations or political ties to these groups may witness an escalation of tensions with the United States. Conversely, stakeholders advocating for national and global security may view the legislation positively, as it represents a concrete action against terrorism.

In conclusion, while the bill is poised to enhance U.S. security measures, it must navigate difficulties related to implementation, enforcement, and international diplomacy. These challenges could shape how effectively the bill achieves its intended aims and its wider impact on all involved parties.

Issues

  • The designation of numerous organizations as foreign terrorist organizations (FTOs) within a 90-day timeframe could lead to resource allocation issues, as this process requires significant administrative effort. This is addressed in Section 2(a).

  • The requirement for the President to make a determination on imposing sanctions within 60 days and to provide detailed explanations for not sanctioning certain organizations could potentially lead to significant political pressure and lacks clarity on the criteria for not imposing sanctions. This concern arises in Section 2(b) and Section 2(c)(2).

  • The repeated requirement for reports every 180 days could be viewed as burdensome and potentially wasteful if significant new information is not consistently available. This is mentioned in Section 2(c).

  • The complexity of determining affiliations with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) may lead to ambiguity in which entities should be designated for sanctions, raising enforcement challenges. Sections 2(a)(30) and 2(b)(1) both touch on this issue.

  • The language regarding the determination of sanctions within 60 days by the President might be considered vague and subject to varying interpretations, especially regarding the criteria for imposing sanctions as articulated in Section 2(b).

  • The short title 'Iranian Terror Prevention Act' might need clarification to avoid ambiguity in how 'terror' is legally defined, as noted in Section 1.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section specifies that the official name of the legislation is the "Iranian Terror Prevention Act."

2. Designation as FTO; imposition of sanctions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Secretary of State to label certain groups as foreign terrorist organizations within 90 days and for the President to decide whether to apply sanctions on these and similar entities within 60 days. Additionally, it mandates regular reports to Congress about new groups that may need the same designations and the reasons for sanction decisions.