Overview
Title
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide incentives for behavioral health integration.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 2509 wants to help doctors work together better with mental health helpers by giving them more money from Medicare, but some people worry it might lead to too much spending without careful checking.
Summary AI
H. R. 2509 aims to modify the Social Security Act to encourage the integration of behavioral health services with primary care. It proposes increased Medicare payment rates for certain behavioral health services from 2027 to 2029. The bill also calls for technical assistance to help primary care practices adopt behavioral health models and provides the necessary funding to support these initiatives.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The bill H.R. 2509, also known as the "Connecting Our Medical Providers with Links to Expand Tailored and Effective Care" or "COMPLETE Care Act," aims to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act. Its primary focus is to provide incentives for integrating behavioral health into primary care, particularly within the Medicare system. This integration is facilitated through increased payments for certain healthcare services over a span of three years, from 2027 to 2029, with a declining percentage each year. Additionally, the bill mandates the provision of technical assistance to primary care practices to support the adoption of behavioral health integration models by 2026, with designated funding for this purpose through 2029.
Significant Issues
One of the main issues with the bill is the potential fiscal impact due to the waiver of budget neutrality in Section 2(a)(2). By allowing payment increases for behavioral health services without corresponding offsetting cuts or budget adjustments, there is a risk of expanding federal spending uncontrollably. Furthermore, the bill proposes diminishing financial incentives over three years, which may not adequately encourage sustained adoption of behavioral health services by primary care providers.
Another area of concern is the vagueness surrounding terms like "appropriate entities" and "other models identified by the Secretary." These undefined terms may lead to subjective interpretations, lack of transparency, and possible favoritism in the implementation of technical assistance programs. Additionally, the bill lacks specific funding limits or oversight mechanisms, potentially leading to unchecked or wasteful spending.
Potential Impact on the Public
For the general public, the integration of behavioral health into primary care could mean more holistic and accessible healthcare services, potentially improving mental health outcomes. However, the financial implications of this bill could impact federal healthcare spending, possibly affecting budget allocations to other essential services.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Primary Care Providers: The bill is designed to incentivize primary care providers to incorporate behavioral health services. However, the declining incentive percentages could make it less appealing for providers to maintain such integrations beyond the initial attraction period.
Patients: Patients may potentially benefit from easier access to comprehensive care, which integrates mental and physical health treatment. This could lead to better management of health conditions and overall improved well-being.
Government and Policymakers: The waiver of budget neutrality presents policymakers with challenges related to fiscal responsibility. Without careful budget planning and transparency, the increased expenditure on behavioral health services could strain federal resources.
Healthcare Entities: Organizations providing behavioral health services might see an increase in demand as primary care practices seek to integrate these services. However, without clear guidelines and consistent funding, these entities might face challenges in implementation.
Overall, while the bill aims to tackle an important aspect of healthcare integration, the issues identified highlight the need for clearer guidelines, fiscal responsibility, and sustained incentives to ensure successful and meaningful implementation.
Issues
The waiver of budget neutrality in Section 2(a)(2) may be viewed as fiscally irresponsible because it allows payment increases for behavioral health services without offsetting cuts or budget adjustments elsewhere, potentially impacting overall federal spending.
The diminishing financial incentives from 175 percent in 2027 to 125 percent in 2029 for behavioral health services in Section 2(a)(1)(C) might not provide sufficient long-term incentives for primary care providers, potentially hindering sustained integration and adoption of these services.
The term 'appropriate entities' in Section 2(b)(1) is not explicitly defined, which could lead to subjective interpretation and favoritism in awarding contracts for providing technical assistance, raising concerns about transparency and accountability.
The broader financial impact on healthcare costs and the federal budget due to incentive payments and budget neutrality waivers (Section 2) is not addressed in the bill, which may lead to concerns about long-term fiscal implications and sustainability.
No specific funding limits or oversight mechanisms are provided in Section 2(b)(4), leading to potential concerns about unchecked or wasteful government spending in implementing technical assistance for behavioral health integration.
The use of undefined 'other models identified by the Secretary' for behavioral health integration in Section 2(b)(2) may lack transparency and accountability, raising questions about the criteria used for selecting and funding these models.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states its short title, which can be referred to as the "Connecting Our Medical Providers with Links to Expand Tailored and Effective Care" or simply the "COMPLETE Care Act".
2. Medicare incentives for behavioral health integration with primary care Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section introduces incentives for integrating behavioral health with primary care by increasing payment amounts for certain services from 2027 to 2029. It also mandates that by 2026, the Secretary of Health and Human Services provides technical assistance to primary care practices adopting behavioral health models, with designated funding through 2029.