Overview
Title
To amend title 46, United States Code, to assign specified liability to a person who transfers title of a commercial vessel, or former commercial vessel, to a transferee for use as a recreational vessel if the transferee does not have applicable insurance at the time of the transfer and the vessel sinks, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
If someone sells a big, old boat to be used for fun but doesn't make sure the new owner gets insurance, and the boat sinks, the person who sold it might have to pay for some of the mess it makes.
Summary AI
H.R. 2500, titled the “Abandoned Vessel Prevention Act,” aims to change the United States Code to make someone responsible for certain costs if they sell a commercial vessel or an old commercial vessel for recreational use, and it sinks without the new owner having insurance. However, this liability only applies if the vessel is 35 feet or longer and over 40 years old, and the new owner doesn't have insurance for the vessel for at least a year post-transfer. The bill defines what costs the original owner would be accountable for, including damages from the sinking, cleanup, and repair costs related to pollution caused by the sinking.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
House Bill 2500, titled the "Abandoned Vessel Prevention Act," aims to amend Title 46 of the United States Code. It introduces liability for individuals who transfer the ownership of commercial vessels, or vessels that were once commercial, for recreational use without ensuring that the new owner has applicable insurance. This liability applies if such a vessel sinks in U.S. waters. Exceptions to this liability include vessels that are smaller than 35 feet, fewer than 40 years old, or those for which the new owner carries insurance covering specific expenses for at least 12 months.
Significant Issues
One of the most notable issues is that the bill could discourage the transfer of older, larger, or uninsured vessels to new owners for recreational purposes. The liability imposed on the seller might lead to a reluctance to sell, possibly resulting in more abandoned vessels. Additionally, smaller or newer vessels are exempt from this rule, which could inadvertently lead to neglect, causing environmental hazards. There is also concern regarding the scope of "specified expenses" covered by insurance. The bill does not clarify how comprehensive this insurance should be, leaving room for potentially inadequate policies. Moreover, the bill does not focus on preventive measures to tackle the root cause of abandoned vessels. Finally, there is a lack of mechanisms for enforcement and compliance, making it challenging to hold liable parties accountable.
Public and Environmental Impact
Broadly, the bill aims to shift responsibility onto the sellers of decommissioned vessels, which might reduce the number of vessels abandoned in U.S. waters. However, without mechanisms to encourage proper disposal or repurposing of these vessels, or measures to ensure comprehensive insurance coverage, the impact might be limited. This bill could prevent some environmental damage from sunken, uninsured vessels but might unintentionally result in increased abandonment by discouraged sellers.
Impact on Stakeholders
For Vessel Sellers: The bill presents a potential risk by holding sellers liable unless they ensure proper insurance coverage by the new owners. This might deter them from selling vessels due to the fear of future liability.
For Vessel Buyers: Buyers could benefit in terms of inheriting better-maintained vessels if sellers become more cautious. However, if insurance requirements aren't adequately clarified, buyers might face financial burdens if insurance does not cover all eventual expenses.
For Environmental Agencies: Organizations focused on protecting waterways might see a positive impact. Still, the lack of preventive measures and detailed insurance coverage could limit overall environmental benefits.
Insurance Providers: Insurance companies might see increased demand for policies covering vessel transfers. Nevertheless, unclear coverage requirements could result in disputes or claims denials, affecting customer satisfaction.
In conclusion, while the bill attempts to address the problem of abandoned vessels, the absence of detailed preventive strategies and enforcement mechanisms might reduce its effectiveness. Stakeholders could face both positive and negative consequences depending on further legislative clarification and implementation guidance.
Issues
The bill imposes liability on individuals who transfer commercial vessels for recreational use without ensuring the transferee has applicable insurance. This could discourage such transfers, leading to more abandoned vessels or improper disposal, which poses environmental risks. [Section 2(a)]
The exemption for vessels under 35 feet or fewer than 40 years old could lead to neglect of smaller or newer vessels, increasing environmental dangers. [Section 2(b)(1)]
The 'specified expenses' covered by insurance could potentially exclude important ecological and economic impacts, requiring clarification to ensure comprehensive coverage. [Section 2(c)(3)]
There is no guidance on enforcement or mechanisms for ensuring compliance, potentially hindering accountability for liable parties. [Section 2]
The section focuses on liability rather than on prevention measures or incentives to prevent vessels from becoming derelict or sinking. This might miss broader environmental and safety concerns. [Section 30107]
The lack of detailed insurance coverage requirements might lead to inadequate insurance policies, leaving significant expenses uncovered if a vessel sinks. [Section 2(b)(2)]
The title 'Abandoned Vessel Prevention Act' implies regulatory aims not explicitly detailed in the bill, creating potential public misunderstanding of its full scope and intent. [Section 1]
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides the short title for the Act, stating that it may be called the “Abandoned Vessel Prevention Act”.
2. Liability for specified expenses resulting from sinking of certain decommissioned commercial vessels Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Under this section, a person who transfers a commercial ship for recreational use is responsible for costs if the ship sinks in U.S. waters, unless the ship is less than 35 feet long, fewer than 40 years old, or if the new owner has proper insurance that covers sinking-related expenses.
30107. Liability for specified expenses resulting from sinking of certain decommissioned commercial vessels Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Anyone who transfers ownership of a decommissioned commercial vessel for recreational use is responsible for costs if it sinks in U.S. waters, unless the vessel is under 35 feet long, less than 40 years old, or the new owner has 12-month insurance covering sinking expenses.