Overview

Title

To require SelectUSA to coordinate with State-level economic development organizations to increase foreign direct investment in semiconductor-related manufacturing and production.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 2480 wants America to make more computer chips by getting help from other countries that are friendly. It asks a group in the government to work with different states to make this happen, but it doesn't give any extra money for them to do this.

Summary AI

H.R. 2480, known as the "Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act of 2025," aims to enhance U.S. semiconductor manufacturing by increasing foreign direct investment in this sector. The bill tasks the SelectUSA program, part of the Department of Commerce, with collaborating with State-level economic development organizations to attract investment and strengthen the semiconductor supply chain. It also mandates SelectUSA to gather input and develop strategies with these organizations, focusing on boosting investment without involving foreign adversaries. The bill requires a report to be submitted within two years on its progress and strategies but does not allocate additional federal funds for its implementation.

Published

2025-04-24
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Reported in House
Date: 2025-04-24
Package ID: BILLS-119hr2480rh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
6
Words:
1,078
Pages:
8
Sentences:
32

Language

Nouns: 354
Verbs: 102
Adjectives: 69
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 38
Entities: 94

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.74
Average Sentence Length:
33.69
Token Entropy:
5.01
Readability (ARI):
21.16

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The bill titled "Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act of 2025" is aimed at enhancing the United States' semiconductor manufacturing capabilities by fostering foreign direct investment. It mandates the SelectUSA program, part of the Department of Commerce, to collaborate with state-level economic development organizations. The bill's goal is to boost investment in semiconductor-related manufacturing and ensure that the supply chain is secure and resilient. Given the critical role semiconductors play in the economy and national security, this legislation addresses recent challenges such as supply shortages exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Summary of Significant Issues

One major issue with the bill is its stipulation in Section 6 that no additional funds will be authorized to implement the legislation. This might limit the bill's effectiveness if existing resources prove inadequate. Furthermore, Section 4 requires interaction with state economic organizations but lacks detailed criteria for incorporating their feedback, potentially leading to ambiguities. The bill does not define "semiconductor-related production" precisely, which could cause inconsistencies in implementation. Moreover, the two-year timeline for producing a report on boosting foreign investment (outlined in Section 5) may not align with the rapidly evolving nature of the semiconductor industry, possibly delaying necessary actions.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, ensuring a stable and robust semiconductor supply chain could translate to economic benefits, as it supports industries that drive job creation and technological advancement. Semiconductors are foundational to numerous technologies, from smartphones to automobiles; hence, a strengthened supply chain could stabilize consumer prices and availability of high-tech goods. However, the absence of additional funding for the bill's initiatives might dampen its potential impact, leading to less efficiency and slower progress in meeting its objectives.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

  • State-Level Economic Development Organizations: These organizations stand to gain significant influence by providing insights and recommendations for attracting foreign investments. However, they may face challenges due to the ambiguity in how their feedback will be utilized and the lack of specified funding.

  • Semiconductor Industry: Companies within the semiconductor industry may benefit from increased investment and a more robust domestic supply chain, enhancing their competitiveness globally. However, unclear definitions and timelines might create uncertainties for these stakeholders as they plan for capacity expansions or new facilities.

  • Federal Agencies and SelectUSA: Agencies involved, particularly SelectUSA, would need to stretch their existing resources to meet the legislation's objectives. Coordination without additional funding or clear guidance might strain their current operations.

Overall, while this bill aims to address critical supply chain issues in the semiconductor industry, its effectiveness could be questioned due to funding constraints, unclear definitions, and potential implementation delays. The success of this initiative will largely depend on how adeptly state and federal entities can navigate these challenges.

Financial Assessment

The bill H.R. 2480, titled the "Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act of 2025," aims to boost the U.S. semiconductor manufacturing industry through increased foreign direct investment. Notably, the bill does not authorize additional funds for carrying out its initiatives, which is a critical aspect to consider when evaluating its potential effectiveness and impact.

Financial Allocations and References

Section 6 of the bill explicitly states, "No additional funds are authorized to be appropriated for the purpose of carrying out this Act." This implies that the activities and objectives of the Act must be achieved using existing resources within the SelectUSA program and its coordinating entities. No new financial allocation or spending increase is outlined in the text, which places a constraint on the bill's implementation in light of potential financial limitations.

Relation to Identified Issues

  1. Funding Constraints and Program Impact: One significant issue identified is whether existing funds will be sufficient to meet the bill's ambitious goals. The lack of additional funding might limit the impact of this Act. For example, if the current financial resources of SelectUSA are inadequate, this limitation could hinder the program's ability to effectively promote foreign investment in the semiconductor sector. This insufficiency could also affect the engagement with State-level economic development organizations, possibly impacting the potential success of the coordination efforts intended by the bill.

  2. Potential Political and Economic Consequences: If the Act's objectives are not met due to budgetary restrictions, there may be political implications, such as criticism from stakeholders expecting tangible outcomes or discontent from states relying on federal assistance to attract foreign investors. The economic implications could include missed opportunities for enhancing domestic semiconductor production capabilities, which can have broader repercussions for economic recovery and national security.

Overall, while the Act sets out a clear mandate for promoting foreign direct investment in semiconductor manufacturing, the specific exclusion of new funding raises concerns about the feasibility of achieving its intended outcomes. Being reliant solely on existing resources places significant pressure on both the SelectUSA program and the collaborating State-level entities, potentially challenging their capacity to adapt and effectively respond without stepping up funding levels.

Issues

  • The lack of allocation of additional funds as per Section 6 might limit the impact of the Act if the existing funding is insufficient for effective implementation. This could be politically significant if the Act fails to achieve its goals due to funding constraints.

  • Section 4 lacks specific criteria or guidelines for analyzing and acting upon the comments solicited from State-level economic development organizations, which could lead to ambiguity in execution and might result in ineffective policy outcomes.

  • The lack of a clear definition of 'semiconductor-related production' in Section 4 could lead to varied interpretations, which may cause inconsistencies in how the Act is implemented across different organizations.

  • Section 5 has a timeline of two years after the enactment of this Act for submitting a report, which could be too slow for an industry as rapidly changing as semiconductor manufacturing, potentially delaying necessary actions to increase foreign direct investment.

  • Section 4 does not specify the mechanisms or criteria for determining who might be considered foreign adversaries, besides a reference to another act, which could lead to legal ambiguity and interpretative challenges.

  • The broad and vague language in Section 5 regarding 'working with other relevant Federal agencies' could lead to inefficient or duplicated efforts if not strategically coordinated.

  • The complexity of language in Section 4 could be challenging for individuals outside specialized fields to fully understand, potentially limiting broader public oversight or engagement.

  • The scope and budget implications of the SelectUSA program are not detailed in Section 2, limiting the ability to evaluate potential spending issues, which may be both financially and politically relevant.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the Act states that this law is officially named the "Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act of 2025."

2. SelectUSA defined Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, the term "SelectUSA" is defined as a program within the Department of Commerce, which was established by Executive Order No. 13577.

3. Findings Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress finds that semiconductors are crucial to both the U.S. economy and national security, and shortages caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and other factors pose a threat. To address these challenges, it emphasizes the need to secure and stabilize the semiconductor supply chain through domestic manufacturing and strategic investments, utilizing programs like SelectUSA to attract foreign and private investments.

Money References

  • (5) The Federal Government can leverage foreign direct investment and private dollars to grow the domestic manufacturing and production capacity of the United States for vulnerable segments of the semiconductor supply chain.

4. Coordination with State-level economic development organizations Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Executive Director of SelectUSA to engage with State-level economic development organizations within 180 days of the Act's enactment. The goal is to gather input on how to boost foreign investment in semiconductor production, identify any obstacles, find public opportunities, and address resource challenges. Additionally, the Director is tasked with developing strategies to enhance foreign investment, either alone or in partnership with these organizations, while ensuring that U.S. efforts don't inadvertently benefit foreign adversaries.

5. Report on increasing foreign direct investment in semiconductor-related manufacturing and production Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Executive Director of SelectUSA to prepare a report within two years about increasing foreign investment in semiconductor manufacturing and production. This report will include feedback from State economic organizations, an outline of current efforts to boost such investments, and potential strategies to strengthen the U.S. semiconductor supply chain by collaborating with other agencies and local organizations.

6. No additional funds Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

No additional money will be set aside or approved to implement this law.