Overview
Title
To prohibit the issuance of licenses or other waivers from sanctions imposed pursuant to certain authorities relating to the conduct of Iran, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 2468 is a plan to stop certain people from making special deals with Iran unless the President proves to Congress that these people have stopped doing bad things, like supporting terrorists. It won't change any old rules about Iran that were already okay before a specific date in 2021.
Summary AI
H. R. 2468 aims to prevent the President from granting licenses or waivers for transactions involving certain Iranian individuals and entities identified as supporting terrorism. For such a license or waiver to be granted, the President must certify to specific Congressional committees that these individuals and entities have ceased any involvement in terrorism. This bill does not affect any general licenses that were already in place as of January 20, 2021, related to these entities.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed bill, H.R. 2468, titled the “No Sanctions Relief for Terrorists Act,” aims to restrict the issuance of licenses or waivers that would otherwise allow transactions with certain foreign individuals and entities associated with Iran. These individuals or entities are specifically those identified as supporting terrorism, as of a past date, January 20, 2021. The bill requires certification from the President to key congressional committees demonstrating that these individuals or entities have ceased involvement in terrorist activities before any license or waiver can be granted.
Summary of Significant Issues
A major issue within the bill is the requirement for the President to certify specific congressional committees regarding the cessation of terrorism activities by Iranian individuals and entities. This requirement might be perceived as limiting the oversight to only the named committees, potentially excluding other relevant bodies.
Another concern is the bill's reliance on designations of individuals as of January 20, 2021. This might lead to enforcement challenges as there is no clear mechanism to update these designations, which could undermine effective implementation.
The complexity of the language used in the bill, particularly about the conditions for granting licenses or waivers, can lead to confusion among stakeholders. Such complexity necessitates further clarification to ensure proper understanding and application.
An additional issue arises from the rule of construction, which prevents changes to existing general licenses. This could constrain the flexibility to adapt to future circumstances, potentially creating legal and administrative hurdles.
Finally, the bill lacks an explicit process or timeline for presidential certification to the committees. This could lead to implementation ambiguities and challenges, both legally and politically.
Impact on the Public
The broad public might perceive the bill as a measure reinforcing national security by maintaining stringent controls over interactions with foreign entities linked to terrorism. However, without a mechanism for updating the designations of individuals and entities, the bill could lead to blind spots in the identification of ongoing or new threats.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Government Officials and Agencies: The bill places a substantial responsibility on the President and certain congressional committees. Limiting oversight to specified committees might streamline the process but also risks excluding relevant parties, leading to a potential lack of comprehensive oversight. Additionally, the agencies tasked with enforcement may encounter challenges updating or managing the list of sanctioned individuals and entities without a clear process.
Foreign Entities and Individuals: Iranian entities currently under sanction would remain unable to engage in transactions involving the U.S. without demonstrating a definitive cessation of involvement in terrorism. This could continue to exert economic and operational pressures on these individuals and entities.
International Relations: The bill could affect diplomatic relationships, particularly with nations involved in global efforts to combat terrorism. While some countries might view the bill as a reaffirmation of a tough stance on terrorism, others might criticize it for its reliance on outdated information.
In sum, while the bill aims to prevent the easing of sanctions without due consideration and checks, it could benefit from clearer language and processes to ensure effective and fair implementation.
Issues
The requirement for the President to certify to specific congressional committees (Committee on Foreign Affairs and Committee on Financial Services in the House, and the Committee on Foreign Relations and Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs in the Senate) about the cessation of terrorism involvement by foreign persons described in Section 2(a) could be controversial, as it might be seen as excluding other relevant committees and lacking transparency or broader oversight.
The bill's reliance on past designations of individuals and entities as of January 20, 2021, in Section 2(b) could lead to administrative and enforcement issues because it does not provide a mechanism for updating the status of designated individuals or entities beyond this date, potentially hindering effective implementation.
The complexity of the language in Section 2, especially regarding the conditions under which licenses or waivers may be granted, might create confusion and hinder comprehension among stakeholders, necessitating clarification to ensure clear understanding and proper application.
The rule of construction in Section 2(c), which prohibits any restriction or modification of general licenses in effect as of January 20, 2021, could limit flexibility and adaptability of future policy adjustments, potentially creating legal and administrative challenges if circumstances change significantly.
The lack of explicit process or timeline for certifying committees in Section 2 could create ambiguity in implementation, potentially complicating the execution of the bill's provisions and leading to legal and political challenges.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section of the bill establishes the official short title for the legislation as the “No Sanctions Relief for Terrorists Act”.
2. Prohibition on licenses and waivers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
No license or waiver for transactions with certain foreign individuals or entities can be granted unless the President assures key congressional committees that these individuals or entities have stopped engaging in terrorism. This applies to all Iranian individuals and entities on a specific list related to terrorism as of January 20, 2021, but does not affect any existing general licenses for transactions with them.