Overview
Title
To repeal the renewable fuel program of the Environmental Protection Agency.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 2460 is a plan to stop a rule that makes people use clean fuel instead of regular fuel. It wants to change some rules so that people don't have to follow the clean fuel law anymore.
Summary AI
H. R. 2460 aims to repeal the renewable fuel program managed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The bill, introduced by Mr. Perry along with Mr. Brecheen and Mr. McClintock, seeks to remove Section 211(o) from the Clean Air Act, effectively ending the EPA's requirements for renewable fuel usage. Additionally, it includes amendments to ensure consistency across other related laws, such as modifications to the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
H.R. 2460, introduced in the 119th Congress, seeks to repeal the renewable fuel program currently administered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This legislative proposal, formally titled the "Eliminating the RFS and Its Destructive Outcomes Act," aims to remove Section 211(o) from the Clean Air Act, which mandates certain levels of renewable fuel, such as biofuels, to be blended into transportation fuels. Additionally, it suggests amendments to related U.S. Codes to bring them in alignment with this repeal.
Significant Issues
One significant issue with the bill is its decision to repeal the renewable fuel program without proposing any alternative approach to managing the country's renewable energy policy. The potential consequences of such a repeal include increased reliance on non-renewable energy sources, with possible environmental ramifications. Moreover, the bill's language in the amendments, particularly regarding Section 107(a)(1)(B) of the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act, might create confusion due to its reference to historical regulatory contexts, which may not be easily understood by all stakeholders.
Another critical concern is the lack of context or explanation for the terms and legislative references used within the bill. This could hinder comprehension for those not familiar with specific regulatory language or legislative history, effectively limiting broader public engagement and understanding.
Potential Impact on the Public
For the general public, the repeal of the renewable fuel program might have mixed implications. On one hand, it could lead to lower fuel prices if reliance on cheaper non-renewable energy sources increases. On the other hand, this shift could have detrimental environmental effects, potentially contributing to increased carbon emissions and climate change challenges.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
From an industry perspective, oil companies might benefit from this repeal due to potentially reduced regulatory constraints and costs associated with blending renewable fuels. Conversely, this change could adversely affect renewable energy producers by diminishing the market for renewable fuels, leading to potential economic setbacks in this sector.
For environmental advocacy groups and policymakers focused on sustainability and climate action, the absence of a replacement strategy for the renewable fuel program could be viewed negatively. It could represent a step back from commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change.
In conclusion, while H.R. 2460 clearly defines its goal of repealing the renewable fuel program, it raises pressing questions and concerns about the country's future energy policy and environmental responsibility. Without clear alternatives or transitional strategies in place, this bill could have far-reaching impacts on both the economy and efforts to mitigate climate change.
Issues
The repeal of Section 211(o) of the Clean Air Act without proposing alternative measures to address renewable fuel policy could have significant environmental implications, potentially increasing reliance on non-renewable energy sources. This is documented in Section 2.
The bill's language in the amendment to Section 107(a)(1)(B) of the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act is potentially ambiguous. It references the status of 40 CFR, part 80 as it was before the enactment of this bill, which might not be clear to stakeholders not familiar with historical policy contexts. This is found in Section 2(b)(2).
The bill's reliance on formal titles and legislative jargon such as 'Eliminating the RFS and Its Destructive Outcomes Act' and references to 40 CFR, part 80 without providing context or definitions within the text could impede understanding and accessibility for the general public. This issue affects the entirety of the bill but is particularly noted in Sections 1 and 2.
The process of amending existing legislation without an accompanying framework for transitioning away from renewable fuels may raise ethical concerns about the commitment to future sustainability and climate goals. This is documented in Section 2(a).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this bill states its short title, which is the “Eliminating the RFS and Its Destructive Outcomes Act”.
2. Repeal of renewable fuel program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text outlines the repeal of Section 211(o) of the Clean Air Act, which dealt with the renewable fuel program, and specifies the necessary adjustments in related sections of the Clean Air Act and the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act to align with this repeal.