Overview
Title
To amend the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019 to prohibit the Federal Communications Commission from granting a license or United States market access for a geostationary orbit satellite system or a nongeostationary orbit satellite system, or an authorization to use an individually licensed earth station or a blanket-licensed earth station, if the license, grant of market access, or authorization would be held or controlled by an entity that produces or provides any covered communications equipment or service or an affiliate of such an entity, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 2458 is like a new rule that stops some companies from using space for their communication gadgets if they make certain risky parts. They want to make sure these stuff aren't controlled by companies that might be bad for our security.
Summary AI
H.R. 2458, also known as the “Secure Space Act of 2025,” proposes changes to the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019. This bill aims to stop the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from granting licenses or United States market access for certain satellite systems or earth stations if they are controlled by companies that produce or provide specific communications equipment or services deemed risky. The bill also requires the FCC to implement rules to enforce these changes within a year of the bill's enactment.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
House Bill 2458, referred to as the "Secure Space Act of 2025," aims to amend the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019. Its main purpose is to restrict the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from granting licenses or allowing market access to any geostationary or nongeostationary orbit satellite systems controlled by entities related to certain communications equipment or services. Essentially, the bill is a preventative measure intended to avoid the risks associated with satellite systems potentially linked to untrusted communication technologies.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill raises several significant issues primarily centered around ambiguity and potential overreach:
Ambiguity in Definitions: The term 'covered communications equipment or service' lacks a clear definition, creating ambiguity about what entities might be affected. This could result in unpredictable enforcement and broad interpretation challenges.
Broad Scope of Affiliates: By prohibiting licenses to not just the primary entities but also their affiliates, who might produce or provide any related communication services, the bill risks excluding legitimate companies. This raises issues around fair market competition.
Lack of Appeal Process: There is no clear process outlined for entities to appeal against FCC decisions under this legislation, which might lead to disputes and perceptions of non-transparency.
Undefined Economic Impact: The potential economic impact on the satellite market is not sufficiently addressed, potentially disadvantaging the U.S. satellite service market by limiting players who can compete.
Impact on the Public Broadly
The general public might face indirect impacts from this bill, particularly if the restrictions lead to a reduction in satellite communication services or increased costs due to limited competition. The intention behind the bill is to enhance security and protect infrastructure, which aligns with public safety and privacy interests. However, vague regulations could lead to enforcement challenges, potentially affecting how quickly new technologies and services can be adopted by U.S. consumers if legitimate providers get excluded mistakenly.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Satellite Service Providers: They are directly impacted, as the bill limits market access for providers associated with certain communication technologies. This can negatively affect their market opportunities and spur legal and administrative challenges.
Technology and Communication Companies: These companies could face increased scrutiny, and if a broad interpretation of 'covered communications equipment' occurs, their ability to launch or operate satellite services in the U.S. might be hindered, impacting their growth and innovation.
Federal Communications Commission (FCC): The FCC will bear the administrative burden of implementing the rules within a tight timeframe. This task could strain their resources unless appropriately supported, affecting their capacity to manage existing responsibilities efficiently.
Overall, while the Secure Space Act of 2025 aims to protect national communication networks, the ambiguities within the bill might lead to unintended consequences. Clearer definitions and structured appeal processes would help address potential concerns, ensuring that the Act's implementation aligns with both security and economic interests.
Issues
The definition of 'covered communications equipment or service' is ambiguous, which can lead to arbitrary application of the prohibition on granting satellite licenses and market access. This issue is significant because it affects the clarity and enforceability of the Act, impacting all entities that may seek such licenses. (Sections 2 and 10)
The prohibition on entities affiliated with those providing 'covered communications equipment or service' could inadvertently exclude legitimate companies due to the broad interpretation of 'affiliate,' affecting market competition and innovation in satellite communications. This is crucial as it pertains to who may or may not access the U.S. satellite market. (Sections 2 and 10)
The lack of defined criteria for determining whether an entity 'produces or provides any covered communications equipment or service' raises concerns over vague regulations that could lead to inconsistent or unfair enforcement, affecting trust in regulatory processes. (Sections 2 and 10)
There is no specified appeal or contestation process for entities denied licenses under this Act, which might lead to legal challenges or concerns regarding transparency and fair treatment by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). (Section 10)
The economic impact of limiting market access for satellite service providers is not addressed, potentially leading to unintended financial or strategic consequences for U.S. market competition and satellite service availability. (Sections 2 and 10)
The requirement for the FCC to issue rules within one year could strain resources or delay implementation if additional guidance or resources are not provided, impacting the efficiency of enacting the Act's provisions. (Section 2)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section of the bill states that the official short title is the "Secure Space Act of 2025."
2. Prohibition on grant of certain satellite licenses, United States market access, or earth station authorizations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019 by preventing the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from giving satellite licenses, market access, or earth station authorizations to companies linked with certain communication equipment providers. The FCC must create rules to enforce this within one year.
10. Prohibition on grant of certain satellite licenses, United States market access, or earth station authorizations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section prohibits the Commission from granting licenses or authorizations for satellite systems or earth stations if they are controlled by entities that produce or provide certain restricted communications equipment or services, or their affiliates. It also defines terms like blanket-licensed earth station, gateway station, and individually licensed earth station in relation to satellite systems.