Overview

Title

To continue Executive Order 14224 in effect indefinitely.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 2453 wants to make sure that a special rule saying "English is the main language in the United States" stays forever, but this can be tricky because it's important to think about people who don’t speak English every day.

Summary AI

H. R. 2453 aims to continue Executive Order 14224 indefinitely. This executive order designates English as the official language of the United States. The bill ensures that any actions taken or regulations issued under this order will remain effective. It was introduced in the House of Representatives by Mrs. Miller-Meeks and Mrs. Harshbarger and referred to related committees for further consideration.

Published

2025-03-27
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-03-27
Package ID: BILLS-119hr2453ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
1
Words:
195
Pages:
1
Sentences:
7

Language

Nouns: 64
Verbs: 13
Adjectives: 5
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 11
Entities: 22

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.44
Average Sentence Length:
27.86
Token Entropy:
4.41
Readability (ARI):
16.85

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

House Bill 2453 seeks to implement Executive Order 14224 indefinitely. This Executive Order officially designates English as the language of the United States. The bill mandates that any actions or regulations set by government agencies following this order should remain in effect without a set end date. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives on March 27, 2025, by Mrs. Miller-Meeks and Mrs. Harshbarger and has been referred to the relevant committees for further consideration.

Summary of Significant Issues

The most pressing issue related to this bill is the lack of context and detailed explanation regarding the implications of designating English as the official language. There are concerns regarding how this designation might affect non-English speaking populations and what it means for civil rights and multicultural policies in the U.S. Additionally, the citation of the executive order in the Federal Register, dated March 1, 2025, is a point of confusion since it refers to a date in the future, raising questions about its accuracy and availability at the time of the bill's drafting.

Another area of concern involves the potential costs associated with enforcing this executive order indefinitely. The bill does not provide details on the potential administrative and compliance expenses that may arise and affect various sectors and groups. The lack of comprehensive information on these aspects contributes to the challenges in assessing the full implications of this legislation.

Impact on the Public Broadly

If enacted, this bill could lead to nationwide changes by establishing English as the definitive language for governmental procedures and documentation. While this could foster consistency and uniformity in government operations, it might also create barriers for non-English-speaking communities. The effects could be particularly noticeable in regions with diverse linguistic populations, potentially influencing access to government services and community participation.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For English-speaking individuals and entities, the bill might enhance clarity and reduce ambiguity in governmental interactions. However, it could negatively impact non-native English speakers, posing challenges in accessing public services and understanding official documentation. Educational institutions and government agencies may face added pressure to align with the new requirements, potentially incurring unnoticed costs.

Additionally, businesses and cultural organizations that cater to or rely on multilingual communities might experience changes in how they engage with these populations. The bill raises broader considerations about the impact on multicultural representation and the importance of inclusivity in a diverse society. Balancing these impacts will be crucial to avoid unintended negative consequences for various stakeholders.

Issues

  • The core issue with Section 1 of the bill is the lack of context and explanation regarding what Executive Order 14224 entails, particularly since it designates English as the official language of the United States. This raises questions about implications for non-English speaking populations and potential impacts on civil rights and multiculturalism.

  • The reference to a future Federal Register citation (90 Fed. Reg. 11363; March 1, 2025) in Section 1 is problematic as it suggests the inclusion of a document that might not have been published yet, raising concerns about the accuracy or availability of the source material at the time of drafting.

  • There is insufficient information on the potential costs associated with maintaining Executive Order 14224 indefinitely, especially concerning any administrative or compliance expenses that may burden certain sectors or groups, as mentioned in Section 1.

  • The brief nature of Section 1 makes it challenging to assess the bill's full extent, potential influence on government policy, and any indirect societal impacts, such as effects on educational or governmental services interacting with diverse linguistic groups.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Executive Order 14224 Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Executive Order 14224 designates English as the official language of the United States, and all regulations or actions taken by government agencies under this order will continue to be in effect.