Overview

Title

To provide that for purposes of determining compliance with title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, locker room facilities in active use in connection with an education program or activity may be in use only by individuals of the same sex as determined solely on each individual’s reproductive biology and genetics at birth.

ELI5 AI

This bill, called H. R. 2452, says that in schools, locker rooms should be used only by boys or girls based on whether they are a boy or a girl when they are born. This is to follow a rule from a long time ago to make sure everyone is treated fairly.

Summary AI

H. R. 2452, also known as the "Keep Our Girls Safe Act of 2025," aims to regulate the use of locker room facilities in educational settings. It mandates that such facilities can only be used by individuals of the same sex, determined solely by their reproductive biology and genetics at birth, to comply with Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. The bill, introduced by Mrs. Miller of Illinois and others, takes effect 30 days after being enacted.

Published

2025-03-27
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-03-27
Package ID: BILLS-119hr2452ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
353
Pages:
2
Sentences:
10

Language

Nouns: 128
Verbs: 15
Adjectives: 14
Adverbs: 9
Numbers: 12
Entities: 38

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.12
Average Sentence Length:
35.30
Token Entropy:
4.60
Readability (ARI):
19.24

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, titled the "Keep Our Girls Safe Act of 2025," aims to regulate the use of locker room facilities in educational settings. Introduced in March 2025 in the House of Representatives, this bill stipulates that these facilities may be used only by individuals of the same sex, as determined by reproductive biology and genetics at birth. The bill's intent is framed within the context of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which broadly aims to prevent sex-based discrimination in educational programs and activities.

Summary of Significant Issues

A key issue with the proposed legislation is its reliance on "reproductive biology and genetics at birth" to determine an individual's sex. This criterion may not adequately consider the complexities associated with gender identity and the realities faced by intersex individuals or those who have undergone gender transition. As a result, the bill could be seen as potentially discriminatory and in conflict with Title IX's overarching anti-discrimination goals.

Moreover, the provision may encounter legal challenges, given that many states and local jurisdictions have laws that protect gender identity. The bill's ambiguity regarding these aspects might lead to significant opposition from civil rights groups and potentially provoke constitutional challenges.

Impact on the Public

The legislation, if enacted, could have broad societal implications by influencing how gender identity is recognized within educational contexts. It might reinforce traditional definitions of sex and gender, impacting students who identify as transgender or non-binary by limiting their access to facilities that align with their gender identity.

For the general public, this could stir significant social debate around the inclusion and rights of transgender individuals, particularly in educational settings. On the one hand, proponents might argue that the bill seeks to maintain privacy and safety in locker rooms based on traditional gender lines. On the other hand, opponents may view it as a step back for transgender rights, potentially generating confusion and distress for students affected by the policy.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For students, particularly those identifying as transgender, the legislation could negatively impact their educational experience. Enforcing locker room use based solely on birth-assigned sex may result in feelings of exclusion or discrimination, further complicating their social and psychological well-being in a school environment.

Schools and educational institutions would need to navigate the complexities of implementing such a law, balancing federal mandates with local laws and the diverse needs of their student bodies. This could lead to administrative challenges and potential funding implications if seen as noncompliant with either state or federal laws.

Civil rights organizations would likely become active stakeholders, as they may challenge the legislation both in public forums and courts, advocating for more inclusive policies that align with broader interpretations of Title IX to protect gender identity.

In summary, while the "Keep Our Girls Safe Act of 2025" seeks to address privacy concerns in educational settings, its approach could inadvertently escalate social tensions about gender identity, sparking significant debate and potential legal challenges. The outcome will largely depend on how society balances the diverse and evolving understanding of gender with the timelines of traditional policies.

Issues

  • Section 2: The bill's reliance on 'reproductive biology and genetics at birth' as the sole determinant for sex could be controversial. It does not account for individuals who are intersex or those who have undergone gender transition, potentially leading to discrimination and legal challenges under existing state or local gender identity laws.

  • Section 2: The legislation could be considered potentially discriminatory, as it explicitly enforces restrictions based on biological sex, which may conflict with Title IX's broader anti-discrimination goals. This might provoke legal scrutiny and opposition from civil rights groups.

  • Section 1: The short title, "Keep Our Girls Safe Act of 2025," lacks specificity about the bill’s provisions and could be seen as inflammatory or misleading, possibly framing the conversation in a manner that suggests a moral imperative without addressing the complexities of gender identity issues.

  • Sections 1 and 2: The bill references Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 without further explanation. This lack of detailed context may lead to confusion, making it challenging for those unfamiliar with these federal regulations to fully understand the bill’s implications.

  • Overall Bill: The bill's focus on locker room facilities highlights societal debates around the use of gender-segregated spaces, potentially escalating political and social tensions regarding transgender rights in educational contexts.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this bill states that the official name of the act is the “Keep Our Girls Safe Act of 2025.”

2. Prohibition Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Under title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, it is illegal for someone of one sex, as defined by their biology and genetics at birth, to use a locker room while it is being used by people of a different sex as part of an education program or activity.

3. Effective date Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Act will become effective 30 days after it has been officially enacted.