Overview
Title
To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study of the Deerfield River for potential addition to the national wild and scenic rivers system, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to see if a pretty river called the Deerfield River should be given special protection, like a special nature award, so it stays beautiful and clean. It asks a group of people to check the river and tell everyone what they think within three years after they get money for the study.
Summary AI
H.R. 2451 proposes to amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to have the Secretary of the Interior study the Deerfield River in Massachusetts and Vermont. The purpose of the study is to determine whether the Deerfield River should be added to the national wild and scenic rivers system. The study will include the entire river and its main tributaries. A report on the results of the study must be submitted to Congress within three years after funding is secured.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The bill titled the "Deerfield River Wild and Scenic River Study Act of 2025" seeks to amend the existing Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. Its primary aim is to instruct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a comprehensive study of the Deerfield River, which flows through Massachusetts and Vermont. The study's goal is to assess the river and its branches and major tributaries for potential inclusion in the national wild and scenic rivers system. The legislation mandates that the study be completed within three years from when funding is made available, with findings to be reported to Congress.
Significant Issues
One of the main issues with this bill is its ambiguity concerning timelines. The provision regarding the completion of the study states that it should occur "Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds are made available," without specifying when the countdown begins. This could result in delays. Additionally, the bill does not provide a detailed budget or financial plan for the study, which could lead to financial inefficiencies. The scope and objectives of the study remain vaguely defined, potentially causing confusion or leading to inconclusive results. Finally, the bill lacks specific criteria for evaluating the study's success or effectiveness.
Impact on the Public
If the Deerfield River is added to the national wild and scenic rivers system following a favorable study, the general public may benefit from enhanced recreational opportunities and environmental conservation efforts. Such a designation typically aims to preserve valuable river ecosystems and promote sustainable recreational use. However, without clear financial planning and a defined scope, the study could face challenges that might delay these potential benefits.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Local communities in Massachusetts and Vermont, particularly those near the river, could experience both positive and negative impacts. On the positive side, heightened federal protection could improve water quality and preserve natural habitats, benefiting wildlife enthusiasts and outdoor recreation industries. Conversely, landowners and developers might face restrictions on land use and development near the river, leading to potential conflicts of interest.
Moreover, the Department of the Interior, tasked with conducting the study, might encounter administrative and operational challenges due to the undefined scope and absence of a specified budget. The involvement of Congress in reviewing the study's findings could also introduce additional political considerations.
In conclusion, while the bill presents a significant opportunity for conserving the Deerfield River, its successful execution will depend largely on clarifying its provisions and ensuring effective resource allocation.
Issues
The lack of detailed budget estimates in Section 2 is a significant concern, as it could lead to overspending or inefficient allocation of resources during the study of the Deerfield River.
Section 2 contains ambiguous language concerning the timeline for completing the study. The phrase 'Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds are made available' does not specify a clear start date for the 3-year period, potentially leading to delays.
The scope of the study in Section 2 is not clearly defined, including objectives and criteria for success, which could result in vague or inconclusive results.
Section 1 is very brief and lacks detailed information about objectives or provisions of the Act, which does not give stakeholders a clear understanding of the potential impact of this legislation on the environment or communities.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section is titled "Short title," and it declares that the official name of the Act is the “Deerfield River Wild and Scenic River Study Act of 2025”.
2. Designation for study; Report Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to include the entire Deerfield River in Massachusetts and Vermont, along with its main branches and major tributaries, for study. It requires the Secretary of the Interior to complete this study within three years of receiving the necessary funding and report the findings to Congress.