Overview
Title
To establish a critical supply chain resiliency and crisis response program in the Department of Commerce, and to secure American leadership in deploying emerging technologies, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 2444 is a plan to help the United States make sure its stuff, like toys or gadgets, can be made and moved around better and without problems. It wants to do this by bringing more work to the US and working with friendly countries to make sure they have the things needed to build and fix stuff here.
Summary AI
H.R. 2444, also known as the "Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2025," aims to strengthen the United States' supply chain resilience and ensure leadership in emerging technologies. This bill instructs the Department of Commerce to develop a program that enhances the stability of critical supply chains and helps the US prepare for and handle supply chain disruptions. It includes the formation of a working group to analyze critical supply chains, identify vulnerabilities, and work with industry experts, governments, and educational institutions to enhance the nation's manufacturing capabilities. The bill is designed to reduce reliance on certain foreign countries and encourages reshoring and collaboration with allies to build a stronger and more secure supply chain network.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The "Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2025" is proposed legislation in the United States Congress intended to bolster the resilience and responsiveness of the nation's supply chains. This bill focuses on strengthening critical industries and emerging technologies essential for maintaining national security and economic stability. It introduces new responsibilities for the Department of Commerce, particularly the Assistant Secretary for Industry and Analysis, to ensure that the United States can respond effectively to supply chain disruptions. Additionally, the bill establishes a "Critical Supply Chain Resilience Working Group" to assess vulnerabilities and propose strategies for enhancing supply chain durability.
Significant Issues
One of the primary concerns with the bill is the lack of specific funding allocations to support the ambitious scope of new responsibilities outlined for the Assistant Secretary and the working group. Without additional financial resources, these initiatives may be underfunded, limiting their potential impact.
Moreover, the bill grants the Assistant Secretary broad discretionary powers to define what constitutes "critical goods," "critical industries," and other significant terms, which could lead to inconsistent application and interpretation. This lack of precise definition can affect regulatory clarity.
The provision exempting critical supply chain information from the Freedom of Information Act raises transparency concerns. Shielding such information from public access could potentially reduce accountability and oversight.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill aims to fortify the United States' capacity to withstand disruptions in essential supply chains. If effectively implemented, the public could benefit from improved national security and economic stability, as vital goods and technologies would be more reliably available during crises.
However, the lack of funding and clear guidelines for implementation poses a risk of inefficiency, which may result in delayed benefits. Should supply chain policies fail to adapt swiftly to emerging challenges, the public might not see the intended improvements in supply chain resilience.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For government agencies, the bill implies increased collaboration and workload, as various departments must coordinate on complex issues related to supply chain resilience. If the lack of additional funding persists, these agencies might struggle to meet expectations with existing resources, potentially hampering their effectiveness.
Industry stakeholders, particularly domestic manufacturers, might benefit from incentives aimed at reducing reliance on international supply chains. However, the broad language could create uncertainty regarding which specific actions are encouraged or required, potentially complicating strategic planning for businesses.
The bill's dense consultation requirements could also lead to administrative burdens for stakeholders involved, including state and local governments and international partners, which may lead to inefficiencies and overlap with existing programs.
In conclusion, while the "Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2025" aims to address critical issues of supply chain security and efficiency, its success will largely depend on how well these significant issues are managed and resolved.
Issues
The lack of specifically defined funding or resources for the Assistant Secretary's additional responsibilities in Section 2 and the establishment of the Critical Supply Chain Resilience Working Group in Section 3 may hamper the effective implementation of the bill's mandates, potentially resulting in inadequate support for these initiatives (Sections 2 and 3).
The exemption of critical supply chain information from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act and the protection of voluntarily shared information as outlined in Section 3 might reduce transparency and accountability, raising ethical concerns regarding government oversight and data protection (Section 3).
The designation process for 'critical industries', 'critical supply chains', and 'critical goods' lacks clear guidelines, public comment and review rules, and is scheduled to update only every 4 years, risking outdated or ineffective criticality assessments (Section 3).
The provision of no additional funding in Section 5 effectively limits the implementation of the bill if current allocations are insufficient, raising questions about the feasibility of new and expanded responsibilities (Section 5).
The broad discretion granted to the Assistant Secretary to define 'critical goods', 'critical industries', and other key terms in Section 7 could lead to inconsistent application and interpretation, affecting regulatory clarity and fairness (Section 7).
The extensive consultation and coordination requirements across various governmental and non-governmental stakeholders may lead to inefficiencies, redundancy, and administrative burden, which could hinder the agility and effectiveness of supply chain resilience efforts (Sections 2 and 3).
The report submission timelines, particularly the 2-year requirement for the Department of Commerce capability assessment report in Section 4, may delay necessary improvements and timely policy responses to emerging supply chain vulnerabilities (Section 4).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the official name of the act is the "Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2025".
2. Additional responsibilities of Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Analysis Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section assigns new duties to the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Analysis, including improving critical supply chains, supporting U.S. manufacturing of emerging technologies, and reducing reliance on imports from certain countries. The Assistant Secretary will work with various organizations to respond to supply chain disruptions and promote local manufacturing.
3. Critical supply chain resilience working group Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Critical Supply Chain Resilience Working Group is to be established within 120 days to address vulnerabilities and strengthen the United States' supply chains for important technologies and goods. The group will evaluate current and future supply chain challenges; engage with federal, state, and international partners; and produce plans and reports to boost the resilience of these supply chains, while protecting sensitive information and ensuring public involvement.
4. Department of Commerce capability assessment Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that the Secretary of Commerce create a report analyzing the department's capabilities related to supply chain resilience and manufacturing innovation. This report must identify relevant duties and resources, assess their effectiveness, and make recommendations for improvements. The Secretary is required to submit this report to Congress within two years, including a strategy to implement the recommendations.
5. No additional funds Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that no extra money is allowed to be allocated to implement this part of the bill.
6. Sunset Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section states that all the rules and obligations outlined in this title will end 10 years after the law is officially passed.
7. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section defines various important terms related to supply chains and industries critical to the national and economic security of the United States. These include specific meanings for concepts such as "agency," "critical industry," "emerging technology," and "supply chain shock," among others, clarifying each one's role and relevance within the context of the bill.