Overview
Title
To amend title 49, United States Code, to limit mass layoffs of employees of the Federal Aviation Administration within 1 year of a major aviation accident, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The "Don't Cut FAA Workers Act of 2025" wants to make sure that if a big plane crash happens, the people in charge of flying safety cannot let go of a lot of workers without first getting a thumbs up from the people in Congress.
Summary AI
H. R. 2431, titled the “Don't Cut FAA Workers Act of 2025,” aims to restrict the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) from implementing mass layoffs within one year following a major aviation accident. The bill stipulates that before any mass layoffs can occur after such an event, the FAA Administrator must notify Congress and receive approval through a joint resolution passed within 60 days. The term "mass layoff" is defined as a job reduction affecting a significant number of FAA employees, either at one single location or across multiple sites. The bill outlines the criteria for what constitutes a major aviation accident, emphasizing incidents resulting in fatal injuries.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The proposed legislation, titled the "Don't Cut FAA Workers Act of 2025," aims to amend title 49 of the United States Code. The central purpose of the bill is to restrict the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) from conducting mass layoffs within one year of a major aviation accident. The bill endeavors to ensure workforce stability during critical periods following such accidents unless Congress explicitly approves the layoffs through a joint resolution.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the primary issues with the bill is the requirement for Congressional approval for mass layoffs within 60 days. This requirement may lead to delays, especially if Congress is not in session or is busy with other legislative priorities, potentially hindering the FAA’s flexibility in managing its workforce effectively. Furthermore, the bill does not clarify the course of action if Congress fails to act within the stipulated period, leading to potential legal and administrative confusion.
The definition of a "mass layoff" also presents some challenges. It is unclear whether the thresholds for layoffs, namely, 10 employees at a single site or 250 overall, must be met separately or collectively. This lack of clarity could result in different interpretations, posing compliance challenges for the agency.
Additionally, the bill defines a "major aviation accident" as one involving "fatal aviation injury," which includes a condition based on time ("within 30 days of such accident"). This may create ambiguity in determining whether an accident qualifies for the limitations on layoffs. The detail concerning how remote employees are considered in a mass layoff calculation adds complexity, potentially increasing the administrative burdens on the FAA.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill seeks to protect FAA employees from the instability that could follow a major aviation accident by preventing hasty mass layoffs. This protection could contribute towards maintaining the agency's operational capacity and ensuring continued aviation safety oversight, which is in the public's interest. However, the effectiveness of this measure might be undermined by the potential delay in layoff decisions due to the requirement for Congressional approval.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For FAA employees, this bill could provide a reassuring safety net in terms of job security following an aviation disaster, thus maintaining morale and allowing them to focus on critical safety tasks without concerns over job loss. Conversely, for the FAA as an organization, the imposed restrictions and procedural requirements for laying off employees might add bureaucratic layers, thereby reducing the agency's agility in managing its workforce and resources during crises.
From a legislative and administrative perspective, members of Congress might face increased pressure to act swiftly and prioritize these resolutions in the event of an aviation accident, adding to their legislative workload. This could potentially divert attention from other pressing matters or slow the response time in approving necessary layoffs.
Overall, while the bill's intentions are clearly aimed at stabilizing the FAA workforce after an aviation incident, its practical implications could present hurdles that might challenge its efficacy in efficiently achieving its goals.
Issues
The bill's requirement for Congressional approval of mass layoffs within 60 days could lead to delays or operational issues if Congress is not in session or if other legislative priorities take precedence, potentially impacting the FAA's ability to manage its workforce effectively after an aviation accident. (Section 40133)
The definition of 'mass layoff' is ambiguous, as it is unclear whether the thresholds of 10 employees at a single site and 250 overall are separate conditions or need to be met together, which could lead to differing interpretations and compliance challenges. (Section 40133)
The provision does not specify what happens if Congress does not act within the 60-day period after receiving the FAA's notification for a proposed mass layoff, leading to ambiguity regarding the authority to proceed with layoffs and potential legal and administrative confusion. (Section 40133)
The bill does not address the potential economic or operational impact on the Federal Aviation Administration if mass layoffs are delayed due to a major aviation accident, which could affect the agency's financial and operational efficiency. (Section 40133)
The definition of 'major aviation accident' relies on 'fatal aviation injury,' which involves a time-based condition ('within 30 days of such accident'), potentially creating ambiguity and subjectivity in determining whether an accident justifies limitations on layoffs. (Section 40133)
The language defining 'mass layoff' includes detailed clauses regarding remote employees, which could add complexity and administrative burdens to the process of calculating employment losses. (Section 40133)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section titled "Short title" states that the official name for this legislation is the “Don't Cut FAA Workers Act of 2025”.
2. Limitation on mass layoffs in event of major aviation accident Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In the event of a major aviation accident, this section prevents the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) from executing a mass layoff of employees within one year after the accident, unless Congress approves the layoff by passing a joint resolution. A "mass layoff" is specifically defined as a job cut affecting either 10 or more FAA employees at one location, or 250 or more FAA employees in total.
40133. Limitation on mass layoffs in event of major aviation accident. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section limits the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) from conducting large employee layoffs for a year following a major aviation accident unless Congress approves. A "mass layoff" is defined as cutting 10 or more FAA workers at a single site or 250 or more workers across the organization, with specific rules for counting affected employees, while a "major aviation accident" involves a fatal injury within 30 days of an aircraft accident.