Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow all individuals to contribute to health savings accounts, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The "Patient Fairness Act of 2025" is a plan to let everyone save more money for health needs in special piggy banks called Health Savings Accounts. It also says that hospitals have to show how much things cost, and some rules will only start after the end of 2025.
Summary AI
H.R. 2419, known as the "Patient Fairness Act of 2025," aims to make several changes to the Internal Revenue Code related to health savings accounts (HSAs). It proposes allowing all individuals to contribute to HSAs, removing restrictions on purchasing health coverage, and increasing contribution limits, especially for those aged 55 and older. The bill also addresses the transfer of HSA funds to relatives after the account holder's death and mandates that hospitals be transparent about their pricing by embedding existing regulations into law. These changes would take effect for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Patient Fairness Act of 2025," aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The primary objective is to expand health savings accounts (HSAs) so that all individuals can contribute to them, regardless of their eligibility for a high-deductible health plan. Significant changes to the existing structure include the removal of restrictions on purchasing health coverage, an increase in contribution limits, and favorable treatment of amounts transferred to relatives after the account beneficiary's death. Furthermore, the bill seeks to provide more transparency around hospital pricing by making current regulations legally binding.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the critical issues with this bill is the potential imbalance created by the revised contribution limits in HSAs. While increasing these limits can be advantageous, they tend to disproportionately favor those with dependents, potentially putting single individuals or those without children at a disadvantage.
Additionally, the bill allows for a tax advantage when transferring HSA funds to relatives after the account holder's death. This could be perceived as a form of favoritism toward relatives, as it excludes non-relatives from receiving similar benefits in estate planning.
Another concern lies in the complexity of the legal language used throughout the bill, particularly in the modified sections of the Internal Revenue Code. The technical nature of the text makes it difficult for the average reader to grasp fully, which might impact public understanding and engagement with the legislation.
Lastly, the effective date means that these changes would not take place until after December 31, 2025, which could potentially delay their benefits. In terms of hospital price transparency, the bill fails to specify enforcement mechanisms, potentially raising concerns about its practical effectiveness.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill can positively impact the public by making HSAs more accessible, which can help individuals save more efficiently for healthcare expenses, thus potentially reducing financial stress related to medical costs. Transparency in hospital pricing could empower consumers to make more informed decisions about their healthcare, ideally leading to a more competitive and fair market for medical services.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For families with dependents, the increased HSA contribution limits could provide significant financial benefits, offering more room to save for future healthcare needs. Moreover, individuals over 55 would benefit from additional contributions, enhancing their ability to prepare for medical expenses in retirement.
Conversely, single individuals or those without dependents might not gain as much from these increased limits, leading to a perceived imbalance in tax advantages. Furthermore, individuals without living relatives might see the favorable treatment of HSA transfers as less beneficial for their estate planning.
On the healthcare provider side, the requirement for hospital price transparency could compel providers to adjust their pricing strategies, potentially leading to lower costs for patients. However, without clear enforcement guidelines, compliance might vary, impacting the overall effectiveness of this legislation.
In summary, while the bill aims to enhance individual capacity to manage healthcare expenses and promote transparency, its success will largely depend on addressing identified issues, particularly around equity and clarity, to ensure that all stakeholders benefit fairly.
Financial Assessment
The "Patient Fairness Act of 2025" (H.R. 2419) proposes several noteworthy changes to the Internal Revenue Code concerning Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) that may have significant financial implications for individuals. Here is a breakdown of the financial references and their broader impact:
Financial Allocations and References
One of the primary financial changes in the bill is the proposal to increase contribution limits to HSAs. The bill allows individuals to contribute a maximum of $8,000 per year to their HSA. In the case of a joint return, this limit doubles to $16,000. Additionally, there is an extra $3,000 contribution allowance for each dependent, which also doubles on a joint return. These enhancements represent a move to provide individuals with greater flexibility and capability to save for their healthcare needs.
Further, the bill introduces extra contributions for individuals aged 55 or older, enabling them to deposit an additional $3,000 or $6,000 for joint returns where both parties meet the age criteria. This provision acknowledges the increasing healthcare needs and financial burdens typically associated with aging.
The legislation also addresses the transfer of HSA funds to relatives after the owner's death, allowing the funds to be transferred into the relative's HSA without the same tax implications. This approach could position HSAs as a favorable estate planning tool, although it might be perceived as preferential treatment that primarily benefits an individual's relatives over non-family beneficiaries.
Issues Related to Financial References
The increases in HSA limits, especially the additional allowances for dependents, raise questions about equity. The proposal provides greater financial benefits to individuals with dependents, which introduces a discrepancy that may not favor those who are single or childless. This creates a scenario where financial advantages are tilted towards families, potentially sidelining other demographic groups.
Another issue arises from the added allowance for relatives upon the transfer of HSA funds after death. This provision could be viewed as favoritism, allowing relatives to benefit more from the deceased's estate planning than non-relatives, which can be seen as unequal in terms of tax benefits.
Moreover, the financial modifications, while conceptually straightforward, are technically complex and tied to amendments of the Internal Revenue Code. This complexity may hinder the average person's understanding and access to the benefits proposed by the bill, particularly for those not well-versed in financial or legal jargon.
Lastly, the effective date for these amendments is set for the tax years beginning after December 31, 2025, which could delay the implementation of these benefits. This delay might lead to public frustration, particularly for those in immediate need of enhanced financial assistance with healthcare expenses, as it postpones the realization of the bill's intended effects.
Overall, the financial adjustments suggested in this bill have the potential to significantly influence how individuals, particularly those with dependents or nearing retirement, manage their healthcare savings and estate planning. However, these benefits are accompanied by concerns regarding their equitable distribution and the clarity with which they are communicated and understood.
Issues
The modifications to health savings accounts (HSAs) in Section 2 include an increase in contribution limits that disproportionately benefit individuals with dependents. This could create an imbalance where single individuals or those without dependents may not experience the same financial advantage.
Section 2 also provides a potential tax advantage by allowing amounts transferred to relatives after the death of an account beneficiary to be treated favorably. This could be seen as favoritism in estate planning, benefiting relatives over non-relatives.
The language in Section 2, particularly regarding complex legal amendments and references to the Internal Revenue Code, may be challenging for the average reader to understand, limiting public comprehension and transparency.
The effective date of the changes in Section 2, set for after December 31, 2025, might delay the realization of benefits or implementation without a clear rationale provided, which could affect public perception of the billâs urgency and efficacy.
Section 3 lacks clarity and context by referring to specific parts of the Code of Federal Regulations without further explanation, potentially hindering public understanding of the implications of hospital price transparency.
Section 3 does not specify enforcement mechanisms for the hospital price transparency provisions, which could raise concerns about the bill's effectiveness in ensuring compliance and accountability.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In Section 1, the act is officially named the "Patient Fairness Act of 2025."
2. Modifications to health savings accounts Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill proposes changes to health savings accounts, allowing all individuals to contribute, removing restrictions on buying health coverage, and increasing contribution limits. It also allows relatives to transfer funds from a deceased person's account without penalty and includes additional contributions for those aged 55 or older, with these changes effective for tax years starting after December 31, 2025.
Money References
- (b) No limitation on purchasing health coverage.âSection 223(d)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subparagraphs (B) and (C) and the last sentence of subparagraph (A). (c) Increase in contribution limits.â (1) IN GENERAL.âSection 223(b)(1) of such Code is amended by striking âthe sum of the monthlyâ and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting âthe sum of $8,000 (twice such amount in the case of a joint return), plus $3,000 (twice such amount in the case of a joint return) for each dependent (within the meaning of subsection (d)(2)) of the taxpayer.â. (2) ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS FOR INDIVIDUALS 55 OR OLDER.âSection 223(b)(3) of such Code is amended to read as follows: â(3) ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS FOR INDIVIDUALS 55 OR OLDER.âIn the case of an individual who has attained age 55 before the close of the taxable year, the applicable limitation under paragraph (1) shall be increased by $3,000 ($6,000 in the case of a joint return by two individuals, both of whom have so attained such age).â.
- (3) Section 223(d)(1)(A)(ii) of such Code is amended by striking âexceeds the sum ofâ and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting âexceeds the limitation with respect to such beneficiary under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (b).â. (4) Section 223(g)(1) of such Code is amendedâ (A) by striking âEach dollar amount in subsections (b)(2) and (c)(2)(A)â and inserting âIn the case of a taxable year beginning after 2021, each dollar amount in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (b)â; (B) by amending subparagraph (B) to read as follows: â(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which such taxable year begins determined by substituting âcalendar year 2020â for âcalendar year 2016â in subparagraph (A)(ii).â, and (C) by striking âunder subsections (b)(2) and (c)(2)(A)â and inserting âunder paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (b)â. (f) Effective date.âThe amendments made by this section shall apply with respect to months in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025. ---
3. Hospital price transparency Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress has made a regulation about hospitals sharing their prices officially part of the law. This rule means hospitals have to be more open about what they charge for their services.