Overview
Title
To authorize sentencing enhancements for certain criminal offenses directed by or coordinated with foreign governments.
ELI5 AI
The DETERRENCE Act is a plan that aims to make punishments tougher for bad things people do when they're told to by other countries, like hurting someone important or scaring them. This way, it tries to stop people from doing bad things for other countries.
Summary AI
The bill H. R. 2394, also known as the “DETERRENCE Act,” seeks to increase penalties for certain crimes committed at the direction of or in coordination with foreign governments. It proposes sentence enhancements for offenses such as kidnapping, murder-for-hire, threats against federal officials, stalking, attacking U.S. officers and employees, and crimes against the President and their staff. The enhancements range from adding a few extra years to a sentence to much larger increases if the offenses involve severe consequences like personal injury or death. This bill aims to strengthen legal penalties and deter foreign-influenced criminal activities.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, referred to as the "DETERRENCE Act," aims to increase legal consequences for specific criminal activities that are carried out in cooperation with foreign governments. This includes offenses like kidnapping, murder-for-hire, stalking, and attacks on U.S. officials and family members. The bill stipulates enhanced prison sentences, ranging from additional years for various crimes when coordinated with foreign entities. It targets criminal acts that may undermine national security through foreign involvement, thereby aiming to deter such behavior by imposing harsher penalties.
Significant Issues
The bill presents several critical issues that could affect its implementation:
Ambiguity in Definitions: The legislation does not clearly define key terms like "foreign government" and "agent of a foreign government." This lack of clarity could lead to differing interpretations and inconsistent enforcement.
Proof of Coordination: The bill lacks specific guidelines on what constitutes "acting in coordination with a foreign government," leading to potential inconsistencies in how these enhancements are applied in legal cases.
Complex Legal Language: The use of legal jargon and cross-references within the bill might make it hard to understand for those without legal expertise, potentially affecting its interpretation and application.
Potential Redundancies: Some sections of the bill contain repetitive phrases regarding sentence enhancements, which could have been streamlined for better clarity and efficiency.
Broad Criteria for Enhancements: The criteria set for the enhancements, such as "acting in coordination," may be too broad and raise ethical concerns regarding possible overreach or due process challenges.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, this bill aims to enhance national security by deterring criminal acts that are influenced or coordinated by foreign entities. The intent is to create a legal deterrent against engaging in severe crimes with foreign governments or their agents. However, the lack of precise definitions and guidelines may lead to varying interpretations, impacting how laws are applied in courts. This inconsistency could, in turn, affect public trust in the justice system.
Impact on Stakeholders
For law enforcement and the judicial system, the bill demands clarity and precision. As written, it might complicate prosecutions due to its vague criteria for what constitutes foreign coordination, leading to potential legal challenges.
For individuals and entities accused of such crimes, there may be concerns regarding fair trial and due process, given the potential vagueness in the definition of the criteria for enhanced sentencing.
For international relations and foreign policy experts, the bill reflects a stance on tightening internal security measures against foreign influences, which may require careful diplomacy to avoid international disputes.
Overall, while the bill seeks to protect against external threats, its successful implementation hinges on clarifying key terms and providing clear legal benchmarks for assessing foreign coordination or direction in criminal activities.
Issues
The lack of definitions for 'foreign government' and 'agent of a foreign government' could lead to significant ambiguity in legal interpretation and enforcement. This issue affects multiple sections, including Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, because clarity is crucial when adding sentencing enhancements based on these criteria.
The absence of specific guidelines or criteria for determining when an offense is 'knowingly at the direction of or in coordination with a foreign government' may result in inconsistent application of sentencing enhancements. This is a critical legal issue affecting all sections where sentence enhancements are proposed, notably Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7.
The complexity of language and legal references, particularly the use of cross-references and legal jargon, may make the bill difficult to interpret for individuals without legal expertise, potentially impacting legal clarity and public understanding. This issue is evident in Sections 3 and 7, where legal references are prevalent.
The potential for redundant language across sections, such as in Section 3, could lead to confusion or misinterpretation. Clarifying and consolidating repeated legal clauses could streamline the bill and improve comprehension.
The criteria for sentence enhancements often include phrases that could lead to broad interpretation, such as 'acting in coordination', which might raise ethical concerns about overreach or infringement on due process rights. This applies to Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7.
The addition of sentence enhancements in multiple sections of the bill does not provide guidance on the level of proof or type of evidence required to demonstrate coordination with foreign governments, leading to potential inconsistencies in legal proceedings as seen in Sections 2, 4, and 6.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section specifies the short title of the Act, which can be referred to as the “Deterring External Threats and Ensuring Robust Responses to Egregious and Nefarious Criminal Endeavors Act” or the “DETERRENCE Act”.
2. Kidnapping Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill amends the U.S. Code to allow for enhanced sentences for kidnapping offenses if they are directed by or coordinated with foreign governments. Specifically, sentences can be increased by up to 10 years for committing or conspiring to commit such offenses, and by up to 5 years for attempted offenses, when there is involvement or cooperation with foreign governments.
3. Use of interstate commerce facilities in the commission of murder-for-hire Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends a law to allow for longer sentences for murder-for-hire when it involves foreign governments, with potential sentence increases of up to 5 or 10 years, depending on factors like whether the crime was directed by a foreign entity and if personal injury results. Additionally, it corrects references to the law in other related legal texts.
4. Influencing, impeding, or retaliating against a federal official by threatening or injuring a family member Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section discusses amendments to a law about influencing or harming federal officials by targeting their family members. It states that if someone does this at the direction of a foreign government, their sentence can be increased up to 5 years for certain assaults or up to 10 years for serious bodily injuries, use of dangerous weapons, or involvement in murder or attempted murder.
5. Stalking Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Section 2261A of title 18, United States Code, has been updated to include enhanced penalties for stalking offenses related to foreign governments. If someone commits stalking crimes in coordination with a foreign government, they could face additional prison time, especially if the victim is seriously injured, a dangerous weapon is used, the victim is under 18, or if the victim dies.
6. Protection of officers and employees of the United States Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section modifies the law to add harsher penalties for crimes against U.S. officers and employees if those crimes are done at the request or in cooperation with foreign governments. The punishment can be increased by up to 10 years in these cases.
7. Presidential and Presidential staff assassination, kidnapping, and assault Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section of the bill allows for sentences to be increased by up to 10 years for crimes involving assassination, kidnapping, or assault against the President or other specified individuals if done in coordination with a foreign government. It specifically targets crimes committed knowingly with foreign direction or collaboration, involving use of dangerous weapons or resulting in personal injury.