Overview
Title
To establish an Independent Financial Technology Working Group to Combat Terrorism and Illicit Financing, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 2384 is a plan to create a special group of people who will help stop bad guys from using digital money to do illegal things like terrorism. This group will include people from the government and money technology companies who will work together to keep everyone safe.
Summary AI
H. R. 2384, also known as the "Financial Technology Protection Act of 2025," aims to establish an Independent Financial Technology Working Group. This group will focus on combating terrorism and illicit financial activities, particularly those involving digital assets and emerging technologies. It will include representatives from various government agencies and sectors such as financial technology and blockchain. The bill also mandates regular reporting on findings and strategies to prevent the misuse of digital assets for illegal purposes.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The "Financial Technology Protection Act of 2025" is a legislative proposal aimed at curbing terrorism and illicit financial activities through the establishment of a dedicated working group. This Working Group is intended to research and develop strategies addressing the misuse of digital assets and emerging technologies. Additionally, the bill mandates that the President submits a report outlining how such technologies could potentially be utilized to evade sanctions or finance terrorism.
General Summary
The bill proposes the creation of an Independent Financial Technology Working Group. This group, chaired by the Secretary of the Treasury, comprises representatives from various government agencies and sectors, including financial technology companies and blockchain intelligence organizations. Their main responsibilities involve researching the misuse of digital assets, developing proposals to enhance anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing efforts, and submitting annual reports on their findings. The group is scheduled to disband after four years unless it needs to extend its activities to wrap up outstanding tasks.
A further requirement of the bill is a strategic report from the President, via the Secretary of the Treasury, about the risks posed by digital assets in terms of sanctions evasion and terrorist financing, which is to be made publicly accessible online.
Significant Issues
Selection Criteria for Working Group Members: One pressing issue is the lack of clear criteria for appointing representatives from private organizations into the Working Group. This ambiguity raises ethical and legal concerns about the process potentially leading to biases or favoritism.
Vagueness in Appointment Powers: The bill allows the Secretary of the Treasury to appoint additional members to the Working Group as needed. This provision lacks specificity, creating potential risks of unchecked expansion, increased costs, and dilution of the group's focus.
Undefined Emerging Technologies: The term "emerging technologies" within the bill is insufficiently defined, which could impede the quality and comprehensiveness of the strategic reports regarding digital assets utilized by rogue actors.
Indefinite Extensions for the Working Group: The sunset clause, while intending to wind up the group's activities after four years, lacks a clear timeframe for completing ongoing tasks, potentially leaving room for indefinite extensions.
Costs of Reporting Requirements: The bill's requirement for public accessibility of reports in multiple formats may necessitate additional costs related to technical resources not outlined, raising concerns over efficient spending.
Ambiguities in Definitions: Some definitions, like that of "blockchain intelligence company," are overly broad, causing potential legal uncertainties about which entities fall within the bill's purview.
Impact on the Public
The general public stands to benefit from the proposed bill, as it seeks to bolster national security by addressing the financial mechanisms that could be exploited by terrorists and those engaged in illicit financial activities. If implemented effectively, the bill's measures could enhance the safety and integrity of financial systems in the United States.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Government Agencies: Agencies tasked with anti-terrorism and financial security measures could gain enhanced tools and coordination capabilities, fostering more robust defenses against evolving threats.
Financial Technology Companies: Companies within the fintech sector might experience increased scrutiny or regulatory compliance obligations due to their involvement in the initiatives prompted by this bill. This could foster innovation in developing technologies that proactively deter misuse.
Blockchain Intelligence Firms: Such entities are likely to play a significant role in the implementation of this bill’s strategies, potentially expanding their market and partnerships with government bodies.
Civil Liberties Organizations: Given the bill's focus on privacy and civil liberties, organizations in this sphere might advocate for careful implementation to avoid overreach that could infringe on individual rights.
While the bill provides a structured approach to tackling serious threats posed by modern financial technologies, the lack of clarity in certain provisions presents significant challenges. Addressing these will be essential to realize the bill's intended benefits effectively.
Issues
The criteria for selecting representatives from private organizations within the Independent Financial Technology Working Group are not clearly defined in Section 2, potentially leading to biases or favoritism. This issue may concern the public due to ethical and legal implications regarding representation and influence.
The provision in Section 2 allowing the Secretary of the Treasury to appoint additional individuals to the Working Group is vague. Without clear limits or controls, this could lead to unchecked expansion, increasing costs and diluting focus, which is a significant financial concern.
Section 3 requires a report and strategy on the use of digital assets by rogue and foreign actors. The term 'emerging technologies' is not clearly defined, which could lead to incomplete reporting and strategy, raising political and legal concerns about the effectiveness of combating illicit activity.
The sunset clause in Section 2 allows for ongoing activities to continue temporarily without a defined timeframe, which could result in indefinite extensions and continued spending, raising financial accountability concerns.
The requirement in Section 3 for the unclassified portion of the report to be made available in all appropriate formats could incur additional costs due to technical requirements not currently outlined, a financial issue the public might consider.
The definitions in Section 4, such as the broad term 'blockchain intelligence company,' may lead to ambiguity about what entities are included, a legal issue that could cause uncertainty for businesses and stakeholders involved in or observing these sectors.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act states its name, which is the “Financial Technology Protection Act of 2025”.
2. Independent Financial Technology Working Group to Combat Terrorism and Illicit Financing Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill establishes an Independent Financial Technology Working Group, led by the Secretary of the Treasury, to combat terrorism and illicit financing. The group, which includes representatives from various government agencies and sectors, is tasked with researching digital asset misuse and proposing new laws and regulations, providing annual reports, and is set to conclude its work after four years unless it needs to finish ongoing efforts.
3. Preventing rogue and foreign actors from evading sanctions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text describes a requirement for the President, through the Secretary of the Treasury, to submit a report to Congress within 180 days of the law's enactment, outlining how digital assets and emerging technologies might be used to evade sanctions and finance terrorism, and detailing a strategy to combat this. This report must be publicly accessible online, and a briefing on the strategy's implementation is required two years after the law's enactment.
4. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section provides definitions for terms used in the Act, such as "appropriate congressional committees", which refers to specific committees in the Senate and House of Representatives. It also defines terms like "blockchain intelligence company", which are businesses offering services related to blockchain technology; "digital asset", which is any digital form of value recorded on a secured digital ledger; and "emerging technologies", which are areas listed by a National Science and Technology Council subcommittee. Other terms include a "foreign terrorist organization", as defined under U.S. law; "illicit use", which encompasses activities like fraud and money laundering; and "terrorist", including individuals engaging in domestic or international terrorism.