Overview
Title
To adjust the boundaries of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area to include the Scarper Ridge property.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 2371 is a plan to make a park called the Golden Gate National Recreation Area bigger by adding a new piece of land called Scarper Ridge. This idea needs more details to understand where this land is and why it should be added to the park.
Summary AI
H. R. 2371 proposes to adjust the boundaries of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area to include a property known as Scarper Ridge. The bill was introduced by Mr. Liccardo and referred to the Committee on Natural Resources. It amends Section 2(a)(2) of the Public Law 92-589 to add land depicted as "Proposed Boundary Addition" on a specific map dated July 2024.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill titled "Scarper Ridge Golden Gate National Recreation Area Boundary Adjustment Act" aims to modify the boundaries of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA) to include an area known as Scarper Ridge. This adjustment would involve incorporating additional land into the recreation area, as depicted on a specific map dated July 2024.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several notable issues arise from this legislative proposal:
Lack of Justification for Boundary Adjustment: The bill does not provide a clear rationale for why the boundary adjustment is necessary. Without understanding the motivations behind this change, there may be concerns about whether this action is needed or if it might lead to inefficient use of resources.
Ambiguity in Land Description: The description of the proposed boundary addition is vague. The bill refers to a parcel labeled as "Proposed Boundary Addition" without detailing its specific location or size. This lack of clarity might lead to disputes or misunderstandings regarding the actual land included within the boundary adjustment.
Dependency on an Unavailable Map: The amendment makes reference to a map titled "Golden Gate National Recreation Area Proposed Boundary Addition" to define the land alteration. However, the map is not included or thoroughly described in the bill, which could result in different interpretations and transparency issues.
Unaddressed Impacts: Another significant concern is the absence of information regarding the potential impacts of the boundary adjustment on local communities, the environment, or existing land use. Insight into these areas is crucial to evaluate the proposal's overall effectiveness and consequences.
Impact on the Public
The incorporation of new land into the Golden Gate National Recreation Area could potentially offer expanded recreational opportunities for the general public, possibly enhancing outdoor activities and tourism in the region. Additionally, enhanced protection and management of this area could benefit environmental conservation efforts.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Local Communities: If existing land use or access rights are affected, local communities could experience disruptions or changes. Without a clear explanation of these potential impacts, it is challenging to predict whether the bill will bring about positive or negative consequences for these groups.
Environment: Environmental stakeholders might support the boundary adjustment if it translates to improved conservation efforts and habitat protection. Conversely, without specific information on environmental impacts, it is difficult to ascertain whether these changes align with current environmental goals.
Government Resources: Implementing this boundary adjustment would entail allocation of government resources and funds. If the need for this change is not convincingly addressed, it could result in criticisms regarding the efficient use of taxpayers' money.
Overall, the proposal to alter the boundaries of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area to include the Scarper Ridge property offers potential benefits but is also accompanied by notable concerns that need to be addressed to fully evaluate its impact and necessity.
Issues
The bill does not provide detailed information or justification for why the boundary adjustment is necessary, which might suggest potential for wasteful spending if the addition is unwarranted. (Section 2)
The text is ambiguous regarding the specific location and size of the 'Proposed Boundary Addition' land parcel, which may lead to confusion or disputes over boundaries. (Section 2)
The amendment relies on a map ('Golden Gate National Recreation Area Proposed Boundary Addition') that is not provided or described in detail in the text, leaving room for misinterpretation or lack of transparency. (Section 2)
There is no information about the impact of the boundary adjustment on local communities, environment, or existing land use, which could be important factors to consider. (Section 2)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section specifies the short title of the Act, which is called the “Scarper Ridge Golden Gate National Recreation Area Boundary Adjustment Act”.
2. Scarper Ridge boundary adjustment Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section modifies Public Law 92–589 by extending the boundaries of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area to include additional land labeled as "Proposed Boundary Addition" on a specific map dated July 2024.