Overview
Title
To improve the cooperation between the United States and the authorities of Taiwan with respect to travel and tourism.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 2370 wants to help the United States and Taiwan be better friends so more people can visit each other's countries. It suggests ideas for making travel safer and easier but needs some clear rules about how to spend money and keep people's information safe.
Summary AI
H. R. 2370, also known as the “Taiwan Travel and Tourism Coordination Act,” aims to enhance cooperation between the United States and Taiwan in the fields of travel and tourism. The bill mandates the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Travel and Tourism, along with the Secretaries of Commerce and State, to engage with Taiwanese authorities to boost tourism ties and safeguard sensitive U.S. interests and information. It also requires periodic reports on these efforts and includes a provision for analyzing the potential establishment of a preclearance facility in Taiwan, which would facilitate and secure travel between the two nations.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The "Taiwan Travel and Tourism Coordination Act," also known as H.R. 2370, is a legislative proposal in the 119th Congress aimed at enhancing tourism-related cooperation between the United States and Taiwan. Introduced by Mrs. Kim, along with Mr. Moolenaar, and Mr. Krishnamoorthi, the bill is designed to strengthen the ties in travel and tourism sectors between the two nations, fostering both economic growth and cultural exchange. The bill details various actions to be taken by U.S. government officials, primarily focusing on expanding tourism cooperation and addressing logistical elements, such as the establishment of preclearance facilities in Taiwan.
Significant Issues
One of the primary issues with the bill is the lack of specific funding sources or budget allocations for the tourism cooperation efforts described in Section 3. This absence of fiscal clarity can lead to unchecked spending and potential accountability problems, as there are no defined financial limits or detailed financial plans.
The language used in the bill, particularly in the sections dealing with cooperation and preclearance facilities, is broad and often vague. For instance, Section 3 does not specify clear, measurable goals or criteria for success in the cooperation efforts with Taiwan, making it difficult to ensure accountability and assess the effectiveness of implemented measures. Additionally, the term "appropriate measures," as related to protecting sensitive information, is ambiguous and could be interpreted in ways that may not safeguard proprietary U.S. interests adequately.
Furthermore, Section 2's definition of "appropriate congressional committees" appears to be narrow, potentially excluding committees that could have relevant interests or oversight responsibilities. This limitation might lead to gaps in oversight and involvement.
Potential Impacts on the Public
For the general public, the bill could lead to increased travel opportunities between the United States and Taiwan, which could enhance cultural exchanges and economic benefits through boosted tourism. However, without clear guidelines and funding, there might be concerns about efficient use of resources and effective protection of sensitive data involved in international collaborations.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For stakeholders in both the U.S. and Taiwanese tourism industries, the bill holds the promise of expanded business opportunities. It aims to create more connections and synergies between industry partners, leading to mutual benefits and growth. However, these stakeholders might also bear the brunt of any inefficiencies stemming from vague implementation goals and potential lapses in data security.
Government bodies involved in the execution and oversight of this bill — notably the Departments of Commerce and State, as well as the Homeland Security — must navigate the legislative requirements and address the highlighted issues to ensure the objectives are met without risking financial or informational security. Clearer definitions and structured planning will be necessary to ensure the cooperation measures are beneficial without causing unintended negative consequences.
Overall, while the bill has the potential to positively impact U.S.-Taiwan relations and the tourism industry, its current form requires more precise language and accountable measures to ensure its successful implementation.
Issues
The bill lacks specific funding sources or budget allocations for the tourism cooperation efforts detailed in Section 3, which can lead to unchecked spending and accountability issues.
Section 3's language on cooperation efforts with Taiwan is broad and does not specify measurable goals or criteria for success, potentially allowing for vague implementation and a lack of accountability.
The bill does not outline specific mechanisms or processes for protecting 'sensitive and proprietary information' as mentioned in Section 3, which could lead to data security vulnerabilities.
In Section 2, the definition of 'appropriate congressional committees' seems to exclude other potentially relevant committees, thereby narrowing the scope of involvement and potentially leading to oversight gaps.
The term 'appropriate measures' used in Section 3 regarding the protection of sensitive information is vague, leading to potential interpretations that may result in insufficient protections.
Section 4 does not provide clear budget implications for establishing a preclearance facility in Taiwan, causing ambiguity around financial impacts and potential wasteful spending.
The 'Report on preclearance facilities in Taiwan' in Section 4 uses vague terms like 'other locations in the Indo-Pacific region,' leading to uncertainty about which areas are being considered.
There is a lack of prioritization in assessing impacts on various sectors (e.g., tourism industry, supply chains) in Section 4, which may lead to subjective interpretation of critical issues.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act provides its official name, which is the "Taiwan Travel and Tourism Coordination Act".
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section provides definitions for specific terms used in the bill. It explains which committees are referred to as "appropriate congressional committees" and identifies the "Assistant Secretary" as the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Travel and Tourism.
3. Tourism cooperation with Taiwan Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill requires the U.S. Assistant Secretary, in coordination with the Secretaries of Commerce and State, to work on improving travel and tourism relations with Taiwan. They must identify opportunities for collaboration and protect U.S. economic interests, while reporting progress annually to Congress.
4. Report on preclearance facilities in Taiwan Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Secretary of Homeland Security, along with other officials, to report to Congress within 180 days about setting up a preclearance facility in Taiwan. This report will analyze the feasibility, benefits, and impacts on trade, tourism, and security, while also considering U.S. foreign relations and potential collaborations with Taiwan.