Overview

Title

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to promote family unity, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The American Families United Act is trying to change the rules so that families who belong together don’t get split up because of immigration issues. It says that if sending someone away would make things really hard for their family, they might be allowed to stay, especially if they're married to or are kids of U.S. citizens.

Summary AI

H.R. 2366, titled the "American Families United Act," aims to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to promote family unity. The bill allows the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security to use their discretion to prevent the removal of certain immigrants who are spouses or children of U.S. citizens, especially if removal would cause hardship. It also provides a framework for reopening immigration cases that were decided before the enactment of this law if they would have resulted in a different outcome under the new rules. The act ensures that in the case of a death of a U.S. citizen, their surviving spouse or child may still seek relief from removal under outlined conditions, promoting the primary goal of keeping families together.

Published

2025-03-26
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-03-26
Package ID: BILLS-119hr2366ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
4
Words:
1,532
Pages:
8
Sentences:
24

Language

Nouns: 485
Verbs: 91
Adjectives: 38
Adverbs: 9
Numbers: 40
Entities: 94

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.90
Average Sentence Length:
63.83
Token Entropy:
4.80
Readability (ARI):
32.15

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, "H. R. 2366" or the "American Families United Act," is designed to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act with the goal of promoting family unity. The primary focus of the bill is to provide discretionary authority to the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security to address situations involving family members of U.S. citizens, especially in cases where deportation would result in significant family hardship.

General Summary of the Bill

The "American Families United Act" aims to adjust U.S. immigration law to allow more flexibility in cases where the deportation of an individual would cause hardship to their U.S. citizen relatives. Specifically, it grants the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security the authority to terminate removal proceedings or waive grounds of inadmissibility for the spouses and children of U.S. citizens. The bill also outlines procedures to reopen past cases where individuals were denied relief that might have been granted under the new rules established by this act. A notable aspect of the bill is its presumption that family separation inherently constitutes a hardship.

Summary of Significant Issues

A significant concern with the bill is its reliance on discretionary authority without specific guidelines. This could lead to inconsistencies in how the law is applied, resulting in unequal treatment of individuals in similar situations. The term "extraordinary circumstances," used in the bill to determine eligibility for relief beyond prescribed time limits, is not defined, leading to potential subjective interpretation. Furthermore, the bill does not provide a defined appeal process or criteria for decision-making clarity when motions to reconsider are denied.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill has the potential to positively impact families facing separation due to immigration issues by providing a legal tool to prevent deportation in cases of hardship. If implemented effectively, it could bring peace of mind and stability to many mixed-status families across the United States. However, the lack of clear criteria for decision-making could lead to uncertainty and unequal applications of the law, which might dampen its potential positive effects.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Family Members of U.S. Citizens: These individuals stand to benefit significantly from this bill, as it could allow them to remain with their families in the United States and avoid the emotional and financial burdens of separation.

Immigration Authorities: The Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security would have increased responsibility and discretion under this bill, which might lead to increased scrutiny and pressure for transparency and consistency in their decision-making.

Legal Practitioners and Advocates: Immigration attorneys and advocates may find the bill useful for advocating on behalf of clients where deportation would cause significant hardship to U.S. citizens. Nonetheless, they may also face challenges due to the lack of clearly defined terms and criteria within the bill, potentially complicating the legal process.

In conclusion, while the "American Families United Act" represents a significant step toward more compassionate immigration policies, its success and impact will largely depend on how its provisions are implemented and the standards set for exercising the discretionary powers it authorizes. Clear definitions and transparent guidelines would enhance its effectiveness and fairness, ensuring that it meets its objective of promoting family unity without causing inconsistent legal outcomes.

Issues

  • The discretion allowed to the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security in Sections 3 and 4 is broad and lacks clearly defined criteria, which could lead to inconsistent application and unequal treatment of individuals. This could have significant political and legal implications regarding the uniformity and fairness of immigration laws.

  • Sections 3 and 4 introduce the concept of 'extraordinary circumstances' without providing a definition, creating potential for subjective interpretation and increasing the likelihood of inconsistent decisions. This ambiguity may lead to significant political and legal challenges.

  • The rule of construction in Section 2 does not specify criteria for exercising discretionary authority nor does it ensure transparency and accountability, raising potential ethical and legal concerns about how discretion is applied across different cases.

  • Section 4 does not specify the appeal process if a motion to reopen or reconsider is denied, which could leave individuals without clear recourse, creating potential ethical and legal ramifications for affected individuals.

  • Section 3 uses complex legal language and cross-references other legal documents, making it difficult for non-experts to understand. This could be seen as a barrier to access for the general public, raising ethical concerns about accessibility of the law.

  • The lack of clear guidelines or criteria in Section 3 for determining when family separation constitutes hardship can lead to subjective decision-making, with political and legal implications regarding consistency and fairness in the execution of immigration laws.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the Act provides its short title, which is “American Families United Act.”

2. Rule of construction Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section clarifies that this Act does not give the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Attorney General any new powers to make discretionary decisions, except on individual cases, and does not change their existing authority under immigration laws.

3. Discretionary authority with respect to family members of united states citizens Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section gives the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security the authority to stop or avoid deportation of family members of U.S. citizens if their removal would cause hardship. This discretion can be used for spouses or children, and also applies to widows and orphans under certain conditions, but excludes those considered inadmissible or deportable under specific grounds.

4. Motions to reopen or reconsider Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

A motion to reopen or reconsider a denied petition, application, or deportation order for an immigrant can be approved if the new law would have favored them at the time of the original denial. This motion must be submitted within two years of the law's enactment date, unless the immigrant can show that extraordinary circumstances prevented timely filing.