Overview
Title
To establish the Immersive Technology Advisory Panel to promote the use of immersive technology in the United States, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
This bill wants to create a special group to help the U.S. use cool new tech like virtual reality in smart and safe ways, while making sure these technologies don’t mess with people's privacy.
Summary AI
H.R. 2321 aims to set up the Immersive Technology Advisory Panel to boost the use of immersive technologies like augmented and virtual reality in the United States. It outlines the panel's formation, membership, and its role in assessing the economic impact and recommending improvements for immersive technology. The bill highlights the need for U.S. leadership in this field, addressing economic competitiveness and national security and ensuring ethical use to protect privacy. Additional reports and studies are mandated to analyze and guide future policy-making.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill titled "United States Leadership in Immersive Technology Act of 2025" aims to establish an Immersive Technology Advisory Panel. This panel is intended to promote the use and development of immersive technology, such as augmented reality, virtual reality, and mixed reality, across the United States. The legislation outlines the creation of a principal advisor role on immersive technology and defines the composition and goals of the advisory panel. The panel is tasked with assessing the economic impact of immersive technology and recommending ways to enhance its use effectively while safeguarding ethical data usage.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the significant concerns with the bill is the broad and somewhat vague definition of "immersive technology." This lack of specificity might lead to inconsistent interpretations, affecting how the bill is implemented and its subsequent legal and financial implications. Also, the legislation does not specify a budget or funding source for the Immersive Technology Advisory Panel, raising questions regarding financial oversight and the potential for inefficient spending.
Moreover, the bill emphasizes the United States' leadership in immersive technology, mentioning China as a competitor. This could be perceived as confrontational, affecting international relations. The absence of a discussion on the societal and ethical implications of immersive technology—such as privacy and user consent—could be a notable oversight.
The timeline proposed for conducting a comprehensive study and publishing a report (2 years and 90 days, respectively) might not align well with the rapidly advancing field of technology, risking the U.S.'s competitive edge.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, the promotion of immersive technology could lead to new job opportunities and avenues for education and training in this emerging field. Enhanced use of such technology could also improve consumer experiences in various sectors, from entertainment to education.
However, issues related to privacy and data protection could negatively impact public trust and raise ethical concerns if not adequately addressed within the framework of the bill. The broad description of immersive technology might further dilute the intended benefits by spreading resources too thinly across undefined domains.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Government Agencies: The establishment of an advisory panel and principal advisor role encourages inter-agency collaboration, although the lack of specific coordination guidelines might lead to potential overlaps and conflicts.
Technology Industry: Companies operating in the immersive technology space could benefit significantly from the government's strategic focus, potentially leading to more investment and innovation. However, businesses may need clarity on standards and expectations for ensuring compliance and alignment with government objectives.
International Relations: The bill’s strong emphasis on U.S. leadership might strain diplomatic relations with countries focused on similar technological advancements. This competitive stance could reduce opportunities for global collaboration.
Ethical and Civil Societies: The lack of focus on ethical considerations might raise alarms among civil society organizations about the protection of individual rights. Active participation from these groups in the advisory panel could help incorporate ethical safeguards.
In conclusion, while the bill aims to position the United States as a leader in the field of immersive technology, its success will largely hinge on addressing the outlined issues and clarifying certain sections to ensure balanced benefits across various stakeholders.
Issues
The definition of 'immersive technology' provided in Section 3 is broad and lacks specificity, potentially leading to varied interpretations and affecting consistency across various sections including Sections 4, 5, and 6. This ambiguity might impact financial, legal, and implementation aspects of the bill.
Section 5 lacks a specified budget or funding source for the establishment and operation of the Immersive Technology Advisory Panel, raising concerns about financial oversight and the potential for wasteful spending. This absence is critical as it could affect the operational effectiveness of the panel.
Section 2's emphasis on the People's Republic of China and the U.S. leadership in immersive technology might be perceived as confrontational or lacking diplomatic language, which could have political and ethical implications, influencing international relations and public perception.
In Section 2, the absence of ethical considerations or potential societal impacts of immersive technology could be an oversight, raising ethical concerns about data privacy, user consent, and broader societal effects.
The responsibilities and powers of the Chairperson and Vice Chair of the Advisory Panel in Section 5 are not explicitly outlined, which could lead to governance issues and lack of accountability within the panel.
The timeline set in Section 6 for the study and subsequent report (2 years for the study and 90 days for report submission) may hinder timely action on immersive technology advancements, risking the U.S.'s competitive edge in a rapidly evolving tech landscape.
Potential inter-agency conflict or overlap as highlighted in Section 4 due to the broad directive to improve coordination among agencies, poses political and operational challenges, especially without specific guidelines on implementation.
Section 2's lack of mention of specific spending or budget allocations creates ambiguity in understanding the financial implications, posing significant financial and operational risks in implementing the bill's objectives.
The term 'any other sector as the Secretary...determines appropriate' in Section 5's membership criteria is broad and may allow for arbitrary member selection without adequate oversight, raising ethical and political concerns about representation and potential favoritism.
Section 5(d)'s unmet need for explicitly defining 'key technology focus areas' relying on external references can introduce inconsistencies and make it difficult for stakeholders to fully understand and engage with the bill's objectives.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act states that it will be called the “United States Leadership in Immersive Technology Act of 2025”.
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress acknowledges the critical importance of immersive technology, such as augmented and virtual reality, in enhancing national competitiveness and security. It finds that leadership in this field is vital for the United States to maintain influence over emerging technologies and ensure alignment with American values, especially as other countries, like China, actively compete in this area.
3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section defines key terms used in the Act, such as "Advisory Panel," which refers to the Immersive Technology Advisory Panel, and "immersive technology," which includes tools like augmented reality, mixed reality, and virtual reality. It also specifies what is meant by "agency," "appropriate committees of Congress," and who the "Secretary" is.
4. Principal advisor on immersive technology Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of the United States will appoint a main advisor on immersive technology, who will promote and support its use and safety, and help coordinate policies between different government agencies.
5. Immersive Technology Advisory Panel Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Immersive Technology Advisory Panel is to be established within 180 days of the law's enactment to offer recommendations about immersive technology in the U.S. The Secretary will appoint a Chair and select up to 10 experts from various fields. The panel will evaluate the economic impact, promote collaboration between government and private sectors, ensure ethical data use, and provide global leadership, meeting at least every four months.
6. Study and report on immersive technology Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that an Advisory Panel conduct a study within two years on the immersive technology industry, assessing its impact on the U.S. economy and national security, and providing strategic recommendations. Additionally, the report detailing the study's findings and suggestions for Congress will be published by the Secretary on a public White House website within 90 days of the study's completion.