Overview
Title
To amend title 38, United States Code, to reform and enhance the pay of Board of Veterans’ Appeals attorneys for recruitment and retention and to increase the decision quality and claims processing speed of the Board, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 2303 is a plan to make sure the lawyers who help veterans with their appeals get paid better and have a chance to move up in their jobs, so they can work faster and make better decisions.
Summary AI
H.R. 2303 aims to amend title 38 of the United States Code to improve the pay and career progression of attorneys at the Board of Veterans’ Appeals. This bill seeks to enhance attorney recruitment and retention by allowing for promotions to a higher pay grade, GS–15, which could improve the board's decision-making quality and speed in processing claims. The proposed enhancements are part of a broader effort to reduce backlogs and improve efficiency in handling veterans' appeals.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
In March 2025, a bill was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives intending to amend title 38 of the United States Code. This bill, known as the "Board of Veterans’ Appeals Attorney Retention and Backlog Reduction Act," aims to make changes to the pay structure for attorneys working at the Board of Veterans’ Appeals. The primary goal is to enhance recruitment and retention by allowing non-supervisory attorneys to be promoted to a higher pay grade within the federal pay scale, specifically to GS-15 of the General Schedule.
General Summary of the Bill
The bill seeks to reform aspects of the pay structure for attorneys at the Board of Veterans' Appeals. By allowing non-supervisory attorneys to be promoted to GS-15, the bill intends to improve both the recruitment of new attorneys and the retention of existing ones. This could potentially lead to increased decision quality and faster processing times for claims handled by the board.
Significant Issues
A primary issue with the bill is the potential for increased government spending as a result of promoting more attorneys to a higher pay grade. However, the bill lacks specifics regarding how these potential pay increases would be funded or the extent of the budgetary impact. There is also a lack of clarity about how many attorneys might be affected or if there are additional criteria for qualifying for promotion. Another concern is the ambiguity regarding when the provisions of this amendment would take effect. This could create confusion over implementation timelines and lead to potential legal challenges if not clearly addressed.
Potential Impact on the Public
For the general public, particularly veterans who rely on the Board of Veterans’ Appeals for claims processing, the bill could lead to faster and higher-quality decision-making processes. If successful, this could mean quicker resolutions for veterans waiting on appeals and could potentially reduce the backlog of cases the board handles.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Veterans' Affairs Attorneys: For attorneys working at the Board of Veterans’ Appeals, the bill could provide significant career advancement opportunities through the promotion to GS-15. This move might not only boost morale and job satisfaction but also attract more qualified applicants to these roles.
Department of Veterans Affairs: The department might face challenges balancing the increased costs associated with higher attorney pay against the benefits of improved decision quality and processing speed. They will need to assess whether the anticipated operational efficiencies will sufficiently offset any increased expenditures.
The proposed amendment to the United States Code brings with it the potential for positive change within the Board of Veterans’ Appeals. However, addressing its implementation details and financial implications will be crucial for ensuring its successful adoption and operation.
Issues
The amendment to promote non-supervisory attorneys at the Board of Veterans' Appeals to grade GS-15 may lead to increased government spending. However, it does not specify if additional funding will be provided to cover these potential pay increases or the overall budgetary impact, which is significant for both financial planning and public accountability. (Section 2)
The amendment lacks detail regarding the overall impact of the promotion to GS-15. Specifically, it does not detail how many attorneys are affected or if there are additional eligibility criteria. Without clarity on the scope, it may lead to misunderstanding or inequitable application of the promotion. (Section 2)
There is ambiguity concerning when the amendment's provisions will take effect, as it does not specify whether the changes are retroactive, immediate, or set for a future date. This lack of clarity could lead to confusion in implementation and potential legal challenges. (Section 2)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the document states that the official name of this law is the “Board of Veterans’ Appeals Attorney Retention and Backlog Reduction Act.”
2. Board of veterans’ appeals attorney career enhancement Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to Section 7101A(b) of title 38 allows non-supervisory attorneys working for the Board of Veterans’ Appeals to be promoted to a higher pay grade, GS-15, within the General Schedule.