Overview
Title
To take certain Federal land in the State of California into trust for the benefit of the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 2302 is about moving a piece of land in California to be looked after by the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians, but they can't use this land to build casinos or play gambling games.
Summary AI
H. R. 2302 aims to transfer specific federal land in California into a trust for the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians. This bill revokes a previous public land order and places approximately 204 acres into the tribe's trust, making these lands part of the tribe's reservation. The Secretary of the Interior will oversee these lands, which may not be used for gaming activities. Additionally, the transfer will follow existing laws for properties held in trust for Native American tribes.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
H.R. 2302, introduced in the 119th Congress, aims to transition certain federal lands in California into trust status for the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians. This legal shift removes prior public land protections, making the land part of the tribe's reservation and granting them control under the Secretary of the Interior's administration. Notably, the bill prohibits the use of the land for gaming activities, such as casinos.
Significant Issues
A key concern with the bill is the absence of a clear rationale for the revocation of the existing public land order and the transfer of these lands into trust. This lack of explanation may lead to questions about the fairness and transparency of the decision, potentially fueling accusations of favoritism or arbitrary decision-making.
Additionally, the bill imposes a gaming prohibition without providing justification, which could be perceived as an infringement on the Tribe's sovereignty and their ability to engage in economic development through gaming, a common revenue source for many tribes.
The language concerning "valid existing rights" is vague, leading to potential legal disputes about what rights are retained by current stakeholders or land users. Moreover, the document references a map critical to understanding the specific lands in question, but does not include the map in the bill text, posing transparency issues for those attempting to assess or understand the impact fully.
Finally, the bill does not disclose the criteria used to determine the specific acreage designated for the transfer, raising further questions about the decision-making process.
Public Impact and Stakeholder Implications
Broadly, this bill could have varied impacts on local and national communities. By transferring land into trust, the government enables the Tribe to exercise greater self-governance over this territory, potentially facilitating cultural preservation and community development. However, the prohibition on gaming could limit the Tribe’s economic opportunities, which might have supported employment and improvement of community services.
For other stakeholders, including local government entities, residents, and businesses in proximity, the transition of land into trust might alter land use dynamics, property values, and jurisdictional matters, impacting nearby community planning and regional development strategies.
For the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians specifically, while the bill provides an opportunity to expand their land and potentially improve cultural and social structures, the restriction on gaming limits one avenue of economic opportunity, which could affect future financial stability and growth opportunities. Furthermore, the lack of transparency and clarity in the bill might lead to legal challenges, which could delay or complicate the implementation of the trust transfer.
Issues
The bill does not provide a clear rationale for why the public land order is being revoked and the specific lands are being placed into trust for the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians (Section 2), which may lead to concerns about favoritism, transparency, and fairness in federal land management.
The prohibition of gaming on the land taken into trust (Section 2(d)) seems to impose restrictive conditions without justification, which might be perceived as infringing on the rights of the Tribe and could generate controversy regarding tribal sovereignty and economic development.
The specification 'subject to valid existing rights' (Section 2(b)) is vague and does not detail what those rights might be, potentially leading to legal disputes concerning the transfer of land.
The absence of the referenced 'Map' in the text (Section 2), which is crucial for understanding the specific lands involved, poses transparency issues and limits stakeholder and public understanding of the land transfer.
The bill provides no explanation for the particular acreage amounts chosen for transfer into trust (Section 2), which might seem arbitrary and lead to questions about the criteria or rationale used to determine these amounts.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act gives the law a short title, which is the “Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians Land Transfer Act of 2025.”
2. Revocation of public land order; Lands to be taken into trust Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines that a previous land order is revoked and the land is transferred to the Secretary of the Interior to be placed into trust for the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians. The transferred land becomes part of the tribe's reservation, cannot be used for gaming activities, and is to be managed under the usual laws for tribal trust properties.