Overview

Title

To prohibit the disclosure of certain genetic information to the People’s Republic of China, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The American Genetic Privacy Act of 2025 is a rule that says people and businesses in America can't share genetic data with China to keep personal secrets safe. If someone breaks this rule, the government will step in to stop them.

Summary AI

H. R. 2286, titled the “American Genetic Privacy Act of 2025,” aims to prevent the sharing of genetic information with the People’s Republic of China. It prohibits individuals and businesses, including commercial DNA testing services, from selling or disclosing genetic information to Chinese entities or those under China's influence or control. The bill empowers the Federal Trade Commission to enforce these prohibitions, classifying violations as unfair or deceptive practices under existing U.S. law. The terms covered include definitions of "commercial DNA testing service" and "genetic information."

Published

2025-03-24
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-03-24
Package ID: BILLS-119hr2286ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
590
Pages:
4
Sentences:
15

Language

Nouns: 201
Verbs: 36
Adjectives: 32
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 21
Entities: 45

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.34
Average Sentence Length:
39.33
Token Entropy:
4.78
Readability (ARI):
22.02

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, H.R. 2286, titled the "American Genetic Privacy Act of 2025," aims to protect genetic information from being disclosed to the People's Republic of China (PRC) or any entities associated with it. Introduced in the House of Representatives by Mr. Burchett and others, the bill seeks to impose stringent controls on the sale and sharing of genetic data obtained through commercial DNA testing services. The enforcement responsibility is assigned to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which would handle violations as unfair or deceptive practices.

Summary of Significant Issues

A critical issue raised by the bill is the term "entity under the influence, control, or ownership of the People's Republic of China." This terminology may lead to challenges in enforcement due to its broad and potentially ambiguous nature. Determining what constitutes influence or control could become complex, particularly in legal settings.

Another concern centers around how the bill manages "aggregated covered information." The lack of detailed guidelines on handling aggregated data, especially about de-identification processes, could pose privacy risks. De-identification is a key factor in ensuring that individuals' privacy is protected even when data is aggregated.

Moreover, the enforcement mechanism relies solely on the FTC, without coordination with other relevant agencies, which might be crucial for effectively addressing international concerns and data compliance. This approach raises questions about whether the FTC alone can manage the complex landscape of global data transfers.

The bill specifically targets the PRC, which might prompt questions about whether similar risks exist with other countries that might also be interested in acquiring such genetic data. This focus may also have implications for international relations and trade.

Lastly, the bill defines commercial DNA testing services narrowly, potentially excluding other entities, like data aggregators or non-commercial organizations, that might collect genetic information. This could create potential loopholes in enforcement, undermining the bill's objectives.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill holds the promise of enhancing privacy protections for individuals using commercial DNA testing services by adding a layer of security against foreign misuse of their genetic information. It underscores the growing importance of safeguarding genetic data in an era where data security is increasingly threatened by international interests.

For consumers, this legislation could increase confidence in the privacy and security of genetic testing services, potentially encouraging more people to utilize such services without fear of their data being misused.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For companies offering commercial DNA testing services, compliance with the new rules may require implementing tighter controls over the data they collect and share. These companies might need to enhance their data security protocols, monitor data flows more closely, and ensure robust mechanisms for verifying the identity of any entities seeking access to genetic information.

On the international front, the bill's focus on the PRC could influence diplomatic and trade relations between the two nations. By making a legislative move against a specific country, the United States might face reciprocal measures or require diplomatic efforts to manage any resulting tensions.

In conclusion, while the "American Genetic Privacy Act of 2025" seeks to strengthen protection for Americans’ genetic information, its implementation and enforcement raise several significant questions. Ensuring clear definitions, broader enforcement cooperation, and consideration of international dynamics will be key to successfully realizing its objectives.

Issues

  • The definition of 'entity under the influence, control, or ownership of the People's Republic of China' in Section 2 may require further clarification to ensure enforceability, as the extent of influence, control, or ownership could be subject to interpretation, leading to potential legal disputes.

  • Section 2 does not provide clear guidance on how 'aggregated covered information' should be handled, especially regarding de-identification and potential re-identification risks, which are important for privacy protection and ethical considerations.

  • The enforcement mechanism in Section 2 solely relies on the Federal Trade Commission without mention of cooperation with other relevant agencies, which may limit the effectiveness of addressing international data transfers and enforcement comprehensively.

  • The bill explicitly targets the People's Republic of China in Section 2, raising questions about whether similar risks exist with other countries and whether equivalent measures should be considered, potentially impacting international relations and trade.

  • The term 'commercial DNA testing service' in Section 2 is defined narrowly, potentially excluding other entities that might gather genetic information, such as third-party data aggregators or non-commercial entities, which could create loopholes in enforcement.

  • Section 1 only includes the short title and does not provide information about the content or implications of the 'American Genetic Privacy Act of 2025', making it difficult to assess the full scope and impact of the legislation.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section provides the short title for the legislation, which is officially named the “American Genetic Privacy Act of 2025.”

2. Prohibition on disclosure of certain genetic information to People’s Republic of China Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section prohibits individuals or companies from selling or sharing genetic information, gathered through DNA testing services, with the People’s Republic of China or any related entities. The Federal Trade Commission is responsible for enforcing this rule, treating violations as unfair or deceptive practices.