Overview

Title

To amend chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code, to provide the President discretion to negotiate collective bargaining agreements entered into under such chapter, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill lets the President change or stop certain worker agreements when they start their job to make sure nothing clashes with their rules or orders, but they have to tell people involved about these changes.

Summary AI

H. R. 2249, titled the “Preserving Presidential Management Authority Act,” seeks to amend chapter 71 of title 5 of the United States Code. The bill would give the President the ability, through agency heads, to terminate parts of collective bargaining agreements that are in effect when the President takes office. It also clarifies that if any part of a collective bargaining agreement conflicts with a presidential order or rule, as decided by the President or agency head, that part cannot be enforced. Additionally, the bill states that this authority cannot be used by a sitting President and requires written notice to be given to relevant parties when such terminations or conflicts are determined.

Published

2025-03-21
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-03-21
Package ID: BILLS-119hr2249ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
463
Pages:
3
Sentences:
13

Language

Nouns: 140
Verbs: 41
Adjectives: 33
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 13
Entities: 21

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.74
Average Sentence Length:
35.62
Token Entropy:
4.71
Readability (ARI):
22.24

AnalysisAI

The bill titled "Preserving Presidential Management Authority Act," introduced as H. R. 2249, aims to amend chapter 71 of title 5 of the United States Code. Its primary objective is to grant the President the discretion to negotiate and potentially modify collective bargaining agreements in federal agencies. The bill is currently under consideration with the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

General Summary

The legislation provides the President with the authority to alter or terminate specific provisions within collective bargaining agreements that are effective at the time they assume office. This authority is particularly focused on provisions determined to conflict with any presidential order, rule, or executive action. However, there is a restriction that this power cannot be exercised by an incumbent President. Furthermore, the head of the relevant agency must provide written notification to affected parties if any changes are made to these agreements based on presidential actions.

Significant Issues

A primary concern is the potential impact on labor stability and employee rights. The ability for the President to nullify parts of existing agreements introduces an element of unpredictability, which may undermine trust and consistency in labor relations. The broad language used in the bill, particularly regarding what constitutes a "conflict" with presidential actions, might result in legal challenges due to its ambiguity and the expansive nature of the powers it confers upon the President. The stipulation that the authority cannot be used by an incumbent President lacks clarity, particularly about applicability to future officeholders.

Impact on the Public

On a broad level, this bill could lead to significant fluctuations in the terms of employment for federal workers. The variability in collective bargaining agreements might impact employee morale and job satisfaction negatively. Moreover, the potential for abrupt changes to agreements could lead to strained labor relations and disruptions in federal operations.

Impact on Stakeholders

Federal Employees and Unions: For federal employees and their unions, the bill could represent a challenge to their negotiating power and the sanctity of collective agreements. Unions might find it difficult to maintain consistent contractual terms if subject to presidential alterations.

Presidential Administration: On the other hand, the bill could strengthen presidential management authority, providing more flexibility to align employee agreements with administrative policies and executive priorities.

Legal and Labor Experts: Given the ambiguities and broad powers encapsulated in the bill, labor law professionals might see an increase in disputes requiring legal interpretation, potentially congesting the judicial system with cases challenging what constitutes a conflict under this legislation.

Overall, the bill presents a significant shift in the balance of power between labor agreements and executive authority. It might potentially enhance presidential flexibility in management but could also lead to a destabilized workforce with undermined labor relations. These complexities necessitate careful consideration of the bill's language and the broad implications of its implementation.

Issues

  • The provision in Section 2 that allows the President to terminate any provision of a collective bargaining agreement as of the date of the President's swearing-in may undermine the stability and predictability of such agreements, raising concerns about employee rights and labor relations stability.

  • The language in Section 2 granting the President authority to declare any conflicting provision of a collective bargaining agreement unenforceable is broad and could be perceived as granting excessive power to the executive branch, potentially infringing on labor rights and leading to legal challenges.

  • The clause in Section 2 stating that any collective bargaining agreement that conflicts with a presidential action is unenforceable might create uncertainty and undermine already established labor agreements.

  • The limitation in Section 2 stating that the authority under subsection (a) may not be exercised by an incumbent President is vague and could lead to confusion. It is unclear whether this restriction applies only to the President at the time of negotiation or all Presidents during the term of the agreement.

  • The term 'conflicts with a rule, executive order, presidential memorandum, or any other presidential order' used in Section 2 is ambiguous without clear definitions, leading to possible legal challenges on what constitutes a conflict.

  • The notification requirement in Section 7107(d) does not specify a timeframe or format for notification of terminations or conflicts, potentially leading to inconsistencies in implementation and creating further ambiguity about communication requirements.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In SECTION 1 of the bill titled the “Preserving Presidential Management Authority Act,” it specifies that this document can be officially referred to by that name.

2. Discretion to Negotiate Collective Bargaining Agreements By President and Clarifying Effect of Conflicting Presidential Actions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The President has the power to end parts of collective bargaining agreements that are in place when they take office, if those parts conflict with presidential decisions. However, this power can't be used by a sitting President, and any changes must be communicated in writing to the affected parties.

7107. Presidential authority to negotiate collective bargaining agreements; clarification of effect of conflicting presidential actions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The President has the authority to cancel parts of collective bargaining agreements when taking office, but this power cannot be used by a sitting President. If there is a conflict between a collective bargaining agreement and a presidential order, the order takes precedence and the conflicting part of the agreement is not valid. The relevant agency must notify the concerned parties in writing about any such decision.