Overview
Title
To amend the Clean Air Act to eliminate a waiver under that Act, to eliminate an authorization for States to use new motor vehicle emission and new motor vehicle engine emissions standards identical to standards adopted in California, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to stop states from making their own car pollution rules based on what California does, so everyone in the country follows the same rules. This means states won't be able to have stricter pollution rules to keep their air clean.
Summary AI
The bill H. R. 2218, titled the "Stop California from Advancing Regulatory Burden Act of 2025," seeks to amend the Clean Air Act by removing specific waivers that allow states to implement motor vehicle emission standards based on those set by California. It repeals the authority for any state to create or enforce their own standards that relate to controlling emissions from nonroad engines or vehicles. Additionally, the bill makes several amendments to the Clean Air Act to eliminate any statutory provisions that referenced these waivers or authorization for states to use California's standards.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, known as H.R. 2218 or the "Stop California from Advancing Regulatory Burden Act of 2025," aims to amend the Clean Air Act. Specifically, the bill seeks to eliminate certain waivers that have historically allowed states to adopt and enforce vehicle emission standards that are more stringent than the federal requirements. Traditionally, California has been granted special permission to set its own standards due to its unique air quality issues, a provision other states could adopt. This bill repeals those waivers and the authorization that allows other states to follow California's lead in setting more rigorous emission standards. Additionally, the bill makes several conforming amendments to ensure consistency throughout the Clean Air Act.
Significant Issues
State Autonomy and Environmental Impact:
One primary concern is the reduction of state autonomy. By repealing the waiver provisions, states will no longer have the flexibility to implement stricter vehicle emission standards tailored to their specific environmental needs. This aligns with the notion presented in the bill that federal regulation should supersede state variations, potentially undermining localized efforts to combat pollution and improve air quality.
Impact on Nonroad Engines and Vehicles:
The bill also prohibits states from attempting to enforce their own standards for nonroad engines and vehicles, such as those used in construction and farming. This could limit states' abilities to regulate emissions from significant sources of air pollution, which might lead to higher emissions and, consequently, poorer air quality.
Removal of California's Model Standards:
By removing the authorization for states to adopt California's stringent new motor vehicle emission standards, the bill could weaken efforts to address air pollution and climate change on a regional level. California has frequently led the way in developing innovative solutions to air quality challenges, serving as a model for other states.
Lack of Justification:
The bill lacks detailed explanations for these significant legislative changes. This absence of justification may fuel concerns about transparency and the rationale behind dismantling carefully developed environmental protections.
Broader Public Impact
The proposed changes could broadly affect environmental policy in the United States by centralizing emission standards at the federal level and potentially making it more challenging for states to pursue initiatives to tackle unique local environmental issues. This centralization might delay progress in improving air quality and controlling health-related problems associated with pollution.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
State Governments:
States will face limitations in their ability to respond independently to environmental challenges, which could be problematic for regions with distinct ecological and health needs. This may impact states' efforts to maintain or improve air quality.
Environmental and Public Health Advocates:
These groups may view the bill negatively as it could cripple efforts to reduce air pollution through stricter state-level regulations. California, particularly, might find its ability to lead environmental reform considerably curtailed.
Businesses and Manufacturers:
There could be a mixed impact on businesses and manufacturers. Some may welcome the consistency and potential cost savings that come with uniform federal standards, while others might be concerned about the long-term environmental costs and potential backlash from environmentally conscious consumers.
In conclusion, H.R. 2218 presents a substantial shift in how vehicle emissions are regulated across the United States. The balance between state flexibility and federal uniformity poses significant implications for air quality, state rights, and environmental policy advancement.
Issues
The bill's repeal of the waiver provisions under Section 209(b) of the Clean Air Act may significantly limit state autonomy in setting stricter vehicle emission standards, affecting states' abilities to address local environmental concerns that diverge from federal regulations. This issue is covered under Section 2 (General Implications).
The prohibition on state standards for nonroad engines or vehicles could impede states from enforcing environmentally friendly policies, potentially leading to higher emissions from sources like construction and farm equipment. This is covered in Section 2 (d).
By eliminating the authorization for states to use California's vehicle emission standards, the bill might undermine efforts to reduce air pollution and combat climate change, as California's standards are often more stringent and designed to address specific regional environmental challenges. This issue is addressed in Section 3.
The bill lacks explicit justification for repealing and modifying significant portions of the Clean Air Act, which could raise concerns about transparency and the rationale behind the legislative changes. This issue is spread across Sections 2 and 3.
The denial of pending waiver applications and the nullification of previously issued waivers could disrupt ongoing state regulatory efforts and existing compliance frameworks. This issue is noted in Section 2 (b).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides the short title of the Act, which is to be called the “Stop California from Advancing Regulatory Burden Act of 2025” or simply the “Stop CARB Act of 2025”.
2. Repeal of waivers of State standards Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill proposes to remove waivers that allowed states to set their own standards for emissions control from nonroad engines and vehicles, including construction and farm equipment and locomotives. It also outlines several amendments to the Clean Air Act to reflect this change, effectively nullifying any existing waivers and denying pending applications for such waivers.
3. Repeal of authorization to use California new motor vehicle emission standards Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill proposes repealing Section 177 of the Clean Air Act, which allowed California to set its own vehicle emission standards. Additionally, it calls for a minor change to another section of the Act, removing a sentence from Section 249(e)(3).