Overview

Title

To designate six creeks in North Carolina in honor of the lives lost in a plane crash in Carteret County, North Carolina, on February 13, 2022, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

In honor of people who died in a plane accident, H.R. 2217 wants to name six creeks in North Carolina after them so that they are remembered forever in maps and books.

Summary AI

H.R. 2217 is a bill introduced in the 119th Congress that aims to commemorate the victims of a plane crash in Carteret County, North Carolina, on February 13, 2022. The bill proposes naming six creeks in North Carolina after the individuals who lost their lives in the crash. Each creek will be officially designated with the name of one victim, and this name change will be recognized in all U.S. laws, documents, and maps. The bill is titled the “Down East Remembrance Act.”

Published

2025-03-18
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-03-18
Package ID: BILLS-119hr2217ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
496
Pages:
2
Sentences:
12

Language

Nouns: 175
Verbs: 31
Adjectives: 5
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 45
Entities: 62

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.74
Average Sentence Length:
41.33
Token Entropy:
4.56
Readability (ARI):
19.86

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The bill titled the "Down East Remembrance Act" proposes to rename six creeks in North Carolina. These designations honor the individuals who lost their lives in a plane crash in Carteret County on February 13, 2022. Each creek is designated a new name associated with one of the victims, identified by specific geographic coordinates to ensure accuracy. The bill mandates that any formal or legal reference to these creeks must use their designated names.

Significant Issues

Several issues arise from this proposal. First, the bill does not elucidate the process or criteria used to select the names for the creeks. Without such transparency, concerns about the fairness or potential favoritism in the naming process remain. Additionally, the bill lacks a discussion on the financial implications of implementing these name changes, leaving open issues about potential wasteful spending of public funds.

Another concern is the use of precise geographic coordinates to define the locations of the creeks. While accurate, this approach may be confusing to readers unfamiliar with geographic mapping, potentially limiting public understanding. Also absent from the bill is any discussion of how renaming the creeks might affect local communities or jurisdictions, leaving questions about the broader implications for local identities and administrative responsibilities.

Impact on the Public

The general public may perceive this act as a meaningful gesture that honors the victims of the tragic plane crash. However, the bill's lack of transparency and potential financial impacts might lead to public skepticism. Some members of the community might question the priority given to this legislative action relative to other public concerns, especially if various costs arise from implementing the name changes.

Impact on Stakeholders

For families of the victims, the bill may serve as a significant tribute, providing a lasting public acknowledgment of their loved ones' lives. This personal impact cannot be understated, as it offers a form of memorialization in a public context.

Local governments and jurisdictions, on the other hand, might face challenges associated with updating maps, signage, and legal documents to reflect the new creek names. These changes might entail administrative efforts and expenses, which could prove burdensome if not addressed with accompanying funding or resources.

In conclusion, while the "Down East Remembrance Act" offers a gesture of remembrance for those who perished in the tragic event, its lack of transparency, unspecified costs, and potential impacts on local governance merit careful consideration to assure public support and effective implementation.

Issues

  • The designation of creek names (Section 2) does not explain the criteria or significance behind the selection of these names. This lack of transparency might suggest favoritism or raise questions about the fairness of the naming process.

  • The bill does not address the potential financial implications of implementing the name changes for the creeks (Section 2). Without provisions for cost, there are concerns about possible wasteful spending.

  • The geographic coordinates provided for the creek designations (Section 2) might be cumbersome for general readers to understand without additional geographic context, potentially limiting public comprehension.

  • There is no mention in the bill of the potential impact on local jurisdictions or communities as a result of the creek designations (Section 2). This omission leaves questions about how these changes might affect local governance or community identity.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that the official short title of the legislation is the "Down East Remembrance Act".

2. Designation of creeks Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text designates specific names for seven creeks using their geographical coordinates, stating that these names must be used in any legal or official reference to these creeks.