Overview
Title
To amend title 49, United States Code, to except from certain requirements relating to eligibility for essential air service Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 2216 is a plan to let places like Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands have special rules so they can more easily get important airplane services, just like Alaska and Hawaii do. This is to help people there travel by air more easily.
Summary AI
H.R. 2216 aims to change U.S. law to make Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands eligible for essential air service by removing certain requirements. This amendment extends the existing exceptions given to Alaska and Hawaii to these territories, allowing them easier access to essential air services. The bill is sponsored by Mr. Moylan and Ms. King-Hinds and has been referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed bill, H.R. 2216, seeks to amend title 49 of the United States Code concerning the eligibility for essential air services. The amendment aims to include Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands in the list of locations exempted from specific requirements, aligning them with previously exempted areas like Alaska and Hawaii. The primary change is in Section 41731(c), wherein the named locations will now also benefit from exceptions in the essential air service program.
Summary of Significant Issues
One notable issue with the bill is the lack of explanation or justification for including Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands in the exemption list. Without a clear rationale, the expansion might seem arbitrary, potentially stirring questions about the motivations behind such legislative changes. Another concern is the absence of detail regarding the financial effects of these changes. Widening the scope of the essential air service eligibility could have considerable budgetary repercussions that remain unaddressed in the text. Lastly, while the amendment's language is straightforward, the lack of context regarding its intent and objectives may confuse the public and stakeholders.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, especially residents of Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands, this amendment might be perceived as a positive change. It could lead to improved transportation options and connectivity by facilitating more accessible and potentially more affordable air services. Nonetheless, without a detailed financial analysis, taxpayers might question how these changes affect federal expenditures and whether there might be shifts in funding priorities or allocations elsewhere.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For residents and businesses in Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands, the inclusion could yield substantial benefits, such as better connectivity and economic opportunities driven by improved air service options. This might also enhance tourism, leading to broader economic growth in these territories. On the other hand, existing service providers and regions already receiving essential air service support might view the changes with concern, particularly if it leads to reallocating or diluting existing resources and support. Policymakers and legislators could face scrutiny due to the lack of explicit motivations and financial disclosure related to the bill, underscoring a potential negative impact if these aspects remain unclarified.
Issues
The amendment to include Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands in the list of exceptions for essential air service eligibility broadens the scope of the bill (Section 1). This expansion lacks clear justification or explanation, which might raise questions about the necessity and potential motivations behind this legislative change.
There is an absence of information about the financial implications tied to extending the scope of eligibility for essential air service to Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands (Section 1). This omission could have significant budgetary impacts that need to be clarified.
The language of Section 1 is clear and straightforward, yet it lacks context or explanation, which may lead to confusion regarding the underlying intent and objectives of the amendment. Stakeholders may find it challenging to discern the purpose of these changes without this additional context.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Exception for certain locations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section modifies a law to include Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands alongside Alaska and Hawaii, allowing them similar exceptions under certain conditions in U.S. law.