Overview
Title
To require an institution of higher education that becomes aware that a student having nonimmigrant status under subparagraph (F)(i) or (J) of section 101(a)(15) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)) has endorsed or supported a foreign terrorist organization to notify the SEVIS, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 2204 is a rule that says if a college finds out that a student from another country is helping a group that does bad things, they have to tell a special office called SEVIS. Then, the student's permission to stay in the country can be taken away, and they might have to leave the country.
Summary AI
H.R. 2204 requires colleges and universities to notify SEVIS when they learn a student with an F-1 or J-1 visa has shown support for a foreign terrorist organization. If evidence of such support is established, the Secretary of State will revoke the student's visa, and the Secretary of Homeland Security will begin deportation proceedings. The bill defines key terms like "foreign terrorist organization," "institution of higher education," and "SEVIS."
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
House Bill 2204 seeks to impose a new requirement on institutions of higher education in the United States. Specifically, if these institutions discover that a student, who is in the U.S. on a J-1 or F-1 nonimmigrant visa, has endorsed or supported a foreign terrorist organization, they must immediately notify the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS). The bill authorizes the Secretary of State to revoke the visa of the student if sufficient evidence of such endorsement or support is established. Additionally, if a student's visa is revoked, the Secretary of Homeland Security must initiate deportation proceedings against the student.
Summary of Significant Issues
Despite its intention to enhance national security, the bill presents several notable issues:
Lack of Procedural Guidance: The bill fails to outline precise procedures for determining whether a student has supported a foreign terrorist organization. This omission could lead to ambiguity or misuse in the process, raising fairness concerns.
Absence of an Appeal Process: Students affected by visa revocation do not have access to an appeal process, which raises significant due process concerns. The lack of an opportunity to contest the revocation may lead to unjust outcomes.
Unchecked Decision-Making Authority: No checks or balances are in place regarding the actions of the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security. This absence could result in transparency and fairness issues, as decisions could be made without proper oversight.
Financial Implications for Educational Institutions: The bill does not account for potential financial burdens on educational institutions related to compliance with these new notification requirements. Without addressing these impacts, institutions might face unforeseen costs.
Lack of Clarity on Updates to Lists: The definitions section does not specify whether updates to official lists, such as foreign terrorist organizations or approved educational institutions, are automatically included. This lack of clarity could lead to future compliance issues.
Impact on the Public
The bill aims to safeguard national security by ensuring that individuals who may pose a threat are identified and dealt with appropriately. However, its broad and somewhat vague language could result in arbitrary or discriminatory enforcement. It might cause worry among international students, impacting their sense of security and potentially leading to decreased international enrollment in U.S. educational institutions.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Educational Institutions
For institutions of higher education, the bill introduces administrative challenges and possible financial burdens. The requirement to monitor student activities related to foreign terrorist organizations could necessitate additional resources and staff training, potentially diverting funds from educational purposes.
International Students
International students on J-1 or F-1 visas might experience increased anxiety and uncertainty regarding their status, as they could be subject to visa revocation based on reports from their educational institutions. The absence of an appeal process leaves them vulnerable to decisions that might impact their education and future.
National Security
From a national security perspective, the bill provides a tool for identifying and mitigating risks associated with foreign terrorist organizations. However, the absence of a defined process might lead to challenges in balancing security concerns with the rights of individuals.
In conclusion, while the bill aims to enhance safety, the lack of procedural safeguards and clarity could lead to unintended consequences, including potential impacts on the educational community and international students' experiences in the U.S.
Issues
The bill lacks guidance on the process for determining student participation or endorsement of a foreign terrorist organization (Section 1), which could lead to potential ambiguity or misuse, raising concerns about fairness and precision in enforcement.
There is no mention of an appeal process for students whose visas have been revoked under Section 1. This omission raises significant concerns about due process and could result in unfair treatment of students.
The bill does not provide checks or balances on the decision-making power of the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security regarding visa revocations and the initiation of removal proceedings (Section 1). This could lead to issues related to transparency and fairness.
Section 1 does not address the potential financial impact on institutions of higher education for implementing the notification requirements, creating a risk of unforeseen financial burden on these institutions.
The definitions section in Subsection (b) of Section 1 does not clarify whether updates to the lists of 'foreign terrorist organizations' or 'approved institutions of higher education' are automatically included, which could lead to ambiguity over time regarding compliance.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Notification by institutions of higher education Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Institutions of higher education must quickly notify the SEVIS if a student on a J-1 or F-1 visa supports or endorses a foreign terrorist organization. If proven, the student's visa will be revoked, and they may face deportation.