Overview
Title
To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that Martin Luther King, Jr. Day shall be observed separately from Inauguration Day, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
This bill wants to make sure that the holiday celebrating Martin Luther King, Jr. and the day a new U.S. president starts their job (Inauguration Day) are on different days so that both special days get their own celebration.
Summary AI
H. R. 2169 aims to amend title 5 of the United States Code to ensure that Martin Luther King, Jr. Day and Inauguration Day are observed on separate dates. Currently, if Inauguration Day falls on Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, the celebration of Martin Luther King, Jr. Day would be moved to the Tuesday following the third Monday in January. The bill seeks to ensure both holidays are recognized and celebrated independently.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed bill, titled the "Proper Celebration of Martin Luther King, Jr. Day and Inauguration Day Act," aims to amend the United States Code to ensure that Martin Luther King, Jr. Day is observed separately from Inauguration Day. Normally, Martin Luther King, Jr. Day is celebrated on the third Monday of January, which, every four years, potentially coincides with the presidential inauguration on January 20th. To address this, the bill proposes that if these two significant dates overlap, Martin Luther King, Jr. Day would instead be observed on the following Tuesday. This bill, therefore, seeks to distinguish each occasion as separately recognized and celebrated.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the main issues with the bill lies in its clarity and completeness. The amendment in Section 2 does not fully explain how Martin Luther King, Jr. Day and Inauguration Day could coincide under current law, as it references parts of Title 5, U.S. Code, without complete context. The reliance on existing legislation without explicit explanation creates ambiguity. Readers not familiar with the U.S. legislative framework or without access to Title 5 might struggle to understand the changes or how and when they might be applied. Furthermore, the brief Section 1 only presents the Act’s short title, leaving out substantive content about the bill’s aims or implications.
Impact on the Public
This bill carries both symbolic and practical significance. By establishing that Martin Luther King, Jr. Day and Inauguration Day should be observed on separate days, it emphasizes each event’s unique importance. Martin Luther King, Jr. Day serves as a time for reflection on civil rights and Martin Luther King Jr.'s legacy, while Inauguration Day is a pivotal event in the democratic process. The proposed change underscores the importance of dedicating specific attention to both occasions without overlap.
For the general public, this adjustment might require changes to public and private sector holiday schedules, potentially affecting school and work calendars. However, the broader intent of the bill—preserving the individual observance of each day—could foster a deeper appreciation of both national events.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Federal and state agencies, alongside private organizations, might face logistical challenges in adapting to this change, especially in terms of planning and scheduling annual holiday calendars. Conversely, the bill could positively impact communities that hold events and educational programs honoring Martin Luther King Jr., as it allows for focused celebration and participation without the competing activities of Inauguration Day.
For lawmakers and policymakers, this bill presents an opportunity to illustrate commitment to honoring both national heritage and civil rights history in a balanced manner. However, the need for clearer legislative language and context suggests that further refinement could be beneficial in promoting understanding and support from the general public.
Issues
The amendment in Section 2 lacks clarity on how Martin Luther King, Jr. Day and Inauguration Day might align and provides insufficient context without reference to subsections (a) and (c) of section 6103, title 5, United States Code. This ambiguity could lead to confusion and misinterpretation among the general public about the new observed dates, which is politically significant given the national importance of both days.
Section 2's reference to inserting a new subsection (d) without a clear and comprehensive explanation could create legal ambiguities. The document does not provide a clear reference or note to existing legislation, making it difficult for readers without direct access to section 6103 of title 5, United States Code to understand the full implications of the changes.
Section 1 is limited in content, providing only the short title without any context or provisions of the Act. This lack of substantive detail prevents evaluation of potential legal or financial implications, which could be significant if the bill influences federal holiday observance policies.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act states that it can be referred to by the short title, “Proper Celebration of Martin Luther King, Jr. Day and Inauguration Day Act.”
2. Separate dates for celebration of Martin Luther King, Jr. Day and Inauguration Day Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the U.S. Code to ensure that if Inauguration Day and Martin Luther King, Jr. Day fall on the same date, Martin Luther King, Jr. Day will be moved to the following Tuesday.