Overview

Title

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to support upgrades at existing hydroelectric dams in order to increase clean energy production, improve the resiliency and reliability of the United States electric grid, enhance the health of the Nation’s rivers and associated wildlife habitats, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to help improve old dams so they can make more clean energy, be safer for animals and the environment, and keep the electric system strong by giving a special 30% money-back for doing this.

Summary AI

The bill, H.R. 2160, also known as the "Maintaining and Enhancing Hydroelectricity and River Restoration Act," aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code to encourage upgrades at existing hydroelectric dams across the United States. It offers a 30% tax credit for improvements made to these facilities, such as adding fish passages, improving water quality, and upgrading dams to meet safety standards. The goal is to increase clean energy production, strengthen the nation's electric grid, and enhance river and wildlife health. The bill also provides rules for elective payments and credit transfers related to these enhancements and is applicable to property placed into service after December 31, 2022.

Published

2025-03-14
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-03-14
Package ID: BILLS-119hr2160ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
1,654
Pages:
8
Sentences:
19

Language

Nouns: 469
Verbs: 138
Adjectives: 75
Adverbs: 6
Numbers: 62
Entities: 91

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.96
Average Sentence Length:
87.05
Token Entropy:
4.96
Readability (ARI):
43.89

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

H.R. 2160 aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide financial incentives for upgrading hydroelectric dams across the United States. The primary goals of the bill are to increase the country's clean energy production, improve the resiliency and reliability of the electric grid, and protect and enhance river and wildlife ecosystems. Specifically, the bill introduces a 30% tax credit for specific improvements made to hydroelectric facilities, which include enhancements like fish passage, water quality maintenance, and dam safety upgrades. The bill outlines several criteria for projects to qualify for the credit, including receiving approval from relevant authorities by a specified date.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the prominent issues identified is the potential for favoritism towards the hydroelectric sector. By offering sizable tax credits exclusively to this sector, the bill might inadvertently sideline other renewable energy initiatives. Moreover, the definition of eligible improvements under "hydropower improvement property" is broad, which could lead to wasteful spending if not properly managed.

The bill's language is complex, using technical terms that might be challenging for the general public or non-experts to understand. For instance, the criteria for qualifying an "approved remote dam," which includes non-contribution to atmosphere pollution, lacks clarity on enforcement and measurement. Additionally, requiring written approval from authorities could create administrative bottlenecks, requiring streamlined processes to avoid delays.

The absence of specified monitoring and evaluation mechanisms within the bill raises concerns about how effectively the credit can be managed and whether it might result in overspending or selecting projects based on cost rather than necessity.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill has the potential to positively impact clean energy production in the United States, contributing to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and the battle against climate change. By improving the infrastructure of existing hydroelectric dams, the initiative could also enhance the reliability and resilience of the national electric grid, benefiting consumers by reducing the likelihood of power outages.

However, the complexities and potential ambiguities in the bill may lead to uncertainties in application, possibly causing extended timelines for project implementation. The emphasis on hydroelectric facilities may also divert resources from other renewable energy projects that are equally important for diversifying the country's energy portfolio.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders in the hydroelectric power sector, this bill offers significant financial incentives, potentially accelerating infrastructure improvements and enhancing operational capabilities. It provides a clear pathway to address environmental concerns related to current dam operations, such as fish migration and water quality.

Regulatory authorities and local government bodies could face increased administrative responsibilities due to the requirement for project approvals. Streamlined and efficient processes will be essential to handle the volume of projects incentivized by the bill efficiently.

Environmental groups might support the bill’s efforts to protect wildlife and improve river ecosystems but could be wary of its broader environmental implications. They could push for clear enforcement and monitoring protocols to ensure that the intended environmental benefits are achieved.

Overall, while H.R. 2160 signals progress toward improving clean energy infrastructure, careful consideration and possible refinement of its provisions are necessary to ensure equitable benefits across the energy sector and minimize potential inefficiencies.

Issues

  • The section granting a 30% credit for maintaining and enhancing hydroelectric facilities in Section 48F may be viewed as favoritism towards the hydroelectric sector without broader energy-enabling provisions, potentially sidelining other renewable energy initiatives.

  • The definition of 'hydropower improvement property' in Section 48F includes a wide variety of enhancements, which might result in wasteful spending due to the broad interpretation of eligible activities if not carefully monitored and assessed.

  • The language in multiple sections, especially in Section 48F, regarding 'approved remote dam' and 'interconnection property,' is overly complex and technical, making it difficult for the public or less specialized stakeholders to fully understand the implications.

  • The criteria for qualifying as an 'approved remote dam' in Section 48F include not contributing to atmosphere pollution, but the enforcement and measurement of this criterion are unclear, leading to potential ambiguity in application.

  • The provision in Section 48F allowing for 30% credit of the basis of hydropower improvement property could incentivize overspending or the selection of more expensive projects meeting minimal criteria, raising concerns over financial prudence.

  • The provision requiring written approval from appropriate authorities for 'hydropower improvement property' in Section 48F could create bottlenecks and delays, especially if the process is not streamlined, impacting project timelines.

  • The bill does not specify monitoring and evaluation mechanisms for ensuring the credit's effective use in Section 48F, leading to potential misuse or abuse without proper oversight.

  • The provision allowing project approval up until January 1, 2032, in Subsection (c)(2) of Section 48F might lead to prolonged periods of uncertainty or intermittent assessments by the approving bodies.

  • Some terms such as 'qualified dam' being defined at the end of Section 48F could cause confusion, necessitating frequent reference back and forth during initial readings of the bill.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this Act allows it to be referred to as the “Maintaining and Enhancing Hydroelectricity and River Restoration Act”.

2. Credit for maintaining and enhancing hydroelectric facilities Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes a 30% tax credit for improvements to hydroelectric facilities, aimed at actions like enhancing fish passage, improving water quality, and upgrading dams to meet safety standards. To qualify, projects must be approved by federal or local officials before January 1, 2032, and the amendments apply to properties placed in service after December 31, 2022.

48F. Credit for maintaining and enhancing hydroelectric facilities Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section provides a tax credit of 30% on costs for improving hydropower facilities, including activities like enhancing fish passage, maintaining water quality, or upgrading dam safety, if placed in service by January 1, 2032. It defines important terms like "hydropower improvement property" and "qualified dam," specifying that improvements must have approval from relevant authorities, and includes eligibility conditions for hydroelectric dams servicing remote areas.