Summary of the Bill

The bill, H.R. 2140, titled the "Diesel Emissions Reduction Act of 2025," proposes an amendment to the Energy Policy Act of 2005. This amendment focuses on extending the authorization of the Diesel Emissions Reduction Program. Specifically, it seeks to change the program's expiration date from 2024 to 2029. Introduced in the House of Representatives by Ms. Matsui and co-sponsored by Mr. Calvert, Ms. Pingree, and Mr. Langworthy, the bill has been referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce for further consideration.

Significant Issues

One of the critical issues with the bill is the absence of details regarding the financial implications or expected outcomes of the program's extension. This lack of transparency can create uncertainty about the budgetary impact of the continued implementation. Additionally, the bill does not provide an assessment or evidence of the Diesel Emissions Reduction Act's past performance or effectiveness, which is necessary to justify the extension and determine whether the program is achieving its intended environmental goals.

Another concern is the minimal context provided by the short title section. While it offers a name for the act, it lacks information about the broader intentions or benefits of the legislation, potentially limiting public engagement or understanding.

Potential Impact on the Public

Broadly speaking, the bill is designed to continue efforts to reduce diesel emissions, an environmental and public health priority. If effective, the program could lead to improved air quality and health benefits for the general population, particularly in urban areas with high diesel traffic. However, the absence of detailed program assessments might raise concerns about accountability and effective use of taxpayer money.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Specific stakeholders, such as industries reliant on diesel, environmental advocacy groups, and public health organizations, could be directly affected by this bill. For industries, the extended regulation may require continued investment in emissions-reducing technologies, potentially increasing operating costs. Conversely, environmental and public health advocates may see the program's continuation as a positive step toward cleaner air and reduced adverse health impacts from diesel pollution.

Without clear data or analysis presented in the bill, it is challenging to gauge the full scope or effectiveness of these impacts, both positive and negative. Stakeholders might benefit from clearer evidence of the program's results and a transparent plan for future implementation to ensure that the extension serves the public interest effectively.