Overview
Title
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to require the Secretary of Homeland Security to prioritize strengthening of State and local law enforcement capabilities to combat transnational repression and terrorism threats related to transnational repression, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 2139 is a law idea that wants to help police officers learn how to stop bad guys from other countries who try to harm or scare people in the U.S., while making sure everyone's rights are safe. It also wants the police to share important information to keep everyone safe and check if this plan works well after a few years.
Summary AI
H. R. 2139 aims to amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to enhance the ability of state and local law enforcement to combat threats of transnational repression and related terrorism. The bill mandates the creation of a training program, developed through the Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers, to help law enforcement officials identify and respond to such threats, with a focus on protecting civil rights and liberties. It outlines requirements for what information should be collected and shared with the private sector to identify threats and protect potential victims. The legislation also requires a review by the Comptroller General two years after its enactment to evaluate its implementation.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
H.R. 2139 aims to amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002. Its primary focus is to instruct the Secretary of Homeland Security to prioritize and enhance the abilities of State and local law enforcement agencies. The target is to combat issues related to transnational repression and terrorism threats that these repressions might pose. A significant component of the bill involves creating a specialized training program, coordinating with various law enforcement levels, and liaising with both public and private stakeholders to identify and mitigate such threats.
Significant Issues
A notable issue with the bill is the lack of detailed budgetary information. This omission makes it challenging to assess the financial feasibility of its implementation and raises questions about potential wasteful spending. Additionally, the bill’s definition of "transnational repression" is complex, which might lead to varied interpretations and enforcement challenges.
Furthermore, the bill does not explicitly outline accountability mechanisms or penalties for non-compliance by law enforcement agencies. This could weaken the effectiveness of the initiative, as agencies might not be motivated to adhere to the provisions without consequences. The vagueness surrounding "personal safety best practices" and the non-committal language in research coordination may lead to inconsistent commitment levels.
Also, the bill's reliance on cooperation with private sectors, such as faith-based organizations and educational authorities, might result in uneven engagement due to differing resources across regions. The provisions concerning information sharing with the private sector additionally raise privacy and data security issues.
Broad Public Impact
The legislation, if effectively implemented, has the potential to significantly enhance public safety by strengthening the capacity of local law enforcement to address international threats operating within the United States. However, without clear financial plans and accountability measures, there is a risk that the intended outcomes may not be fully realized. Additionally, the introduction of rigorous training could improve trust and cooperation between law enforcement agencies and communities, provided that privacy and civil liberty protections are robustly maintained.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For local and state law enforcement agencies, the bill proposes enhanced training and resources which could improve their operational capabilities in addressing complex international threats. However, ambiguity in definitions and potential lack of resources across regions may affect effectiveness uniformly.
For private sector stakeholders and community organizations, increased cooperation with law enforcement could foster trust and collaborative safety efforts. Yet, without clear guidelines, these partnerships might encounter challenges concerning resource allocation, privacy, and data security commitments.
Victims and potential targets of transnational repression might benefit from improved support services and proactive safety measures. Nonetheless, inconsistent implementation or lack of access to adequate resources could limit the intended protections and support effectiveness.
In summary, while H.R. 2139 presents valuable initiatives to bolster national security against transnational threats, necessary refinements in financial planning, accountability measures, and procedural clarity are critical for achieving consistent and effective outcomes.
Issues
The lack of detailed budgetary information in Sections 2 and 890E makes it difficult to assess the financial feasibility and potential for wasteful spending in the implementation of the bill.
The definition of 'transnational repression' in Section 890E is complex and may lead to varying interpretations, which could result in inconsistent enforcement or legal challenges.
The absence of specific accountability mechanisms or penalties for non-compliance in Sections 2 and 890E could affect the bill's effectiveness by allowing State, local, and tribal law enforcement to avoid adherence without consequence.
The provision for 'personal safety best practices' in Section 2 is vague and could benefit from more specific guidelines or examples to ensure clarity in implementation and effectiveness.
The phrase 'to the extent practicable' in Section 2 concerning the coordination of research and development is non-committal and might lead to varying commitment levels, reducing the initiative's impact.
There is no clear accountability framework or metrics to measure the effectiveness of training programs in Section 890E, posing challenges to ensuring the initiative achieves its objectives.
The reliance on coordination with private sector, faith-based organizations, educational authorities, and communities in Sections 2 and 890E may lead to inconsistent engagement and challenges across regions due to varying resources and capabilities.
The language regarding the sharing of information with the private sector in Section 890E is general, raising privacy and data security concerns that require clearer guidelines to protect sensitive information.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act establishes its short title, which is “Strengthening State and Local Efforts to Counter Transnational Repression Act.”
2. Countering transnational repression Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002 by adding a new section that requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to develop a training program for law enforcement to tackle transnational repression and related terrorism threats. It also outlines definitions, mandates community awareness efforts, and involves research to improve training participation, with a report due in two years on its implementation.
890E. Strengthening State and local law enforcement efforts to counter transnational repression and terrorism threats related to transnational repression Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section establishes a training program to help state, local, Tribal, campus, and territorial law enforcement personnel identify and respond to threats of transnational repression and terrorism. It also involves sharing information with communities, promoting personal safety best practices, and ensuring victims have access to support resources, all while upholding privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties.