Overview
Title
To amend title 18, United States Code, to authorize Secret Service to reimburse State and local governments for the use of services, personnel, equipment, and facilities.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to let the Secret Service pay back local police, firefighters, or resources if they need their help, even if it happened before the bill was passed.
Summary AI
The bill H. R. 2131 is proposed to change a part of the United States Code to allow the Secret Service to pay back state and local governments for the use of their resources when needed, such as their services, personnel, equipment, and facilities. Named the “Presidential Security Resources Reimbursement Act of 2025,” it ensures these reimbursements can also cover past expenses from July 12, 2024, until the bill takes effect. This means if local governments helped the Secret Service during this time, they can still get reimbursed.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
House Bill H. R. 2131, titled the "Presidential Security Resources Reimbursement Act of 2025," proposes amendments to Title 18 of the United States Code. This bill, upon enactment, would allow the Secretary of Homeland Security to reimburse state and local governments for their services, personnel, equipment, and facilities when used for specific security functions handled by the Secret Service. Importantly, the bill also contains provisions allowing retroactive reimbursements for such uses dating back to July 12, 2024.
Significant Issues
One of the primary concerns with this bill is the potential for unchecked financial liabilities due to the absence of specified limits or caps on reimbursement amounts. This raises concerns about excessive spending. Additionally, the bill contains vague language in its portrayal of "State and local governments," which does not provide a clear method of distribution or prioritization of funds, leading to potential favoritism or regional imbalances. There is also an absence of a mechanism to audit or verify the reimbursements, which could lead to misuse or inefficiencies. Furthermore, the retroactive component of the bill may introduce budgetary uncertainties, as it applies to periods unplanned for in current fiscal budgets. The effective date of the section is not clearly defined, adding to potential ambiguities.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
Broadly, the passage of this bill would likely increase coordination between federal and local law enforcement agencies, improving security measures for presidential protection when state and local resources are utilized. This could lead to more efficient deployment of these resources during national security events. However, the financial implications could be significant if unchecked reimbursements strain the federal budget, potentially leading to reallocations from other public services.
State and local governments stand to benefit directly from this legislation, as they could receive federal reimbursements for their contributions to security efforts. This could alleviate some financial burdens associated with deploying local resources for federal security tasks. However, without clear auditing and approval processes, there is a risk of discrepancies in how these reimbursements are applied, possibly leading to disputes or inequities among different jurisdictions.
In summary, while the bill aims to streamline and support the coordination of security operations for presidential protection, unresolved financial and operational specifics introduce uncertainties. Addressing these concerns could lead to more predictable and equitable applications, allowing the bill to fulfill its intent without undue negative outcomes.
Issues
The lack of specified limits or caps on the reimbursement amounts in Section 2 could lead to excessively high spending, which is a significant financial concern for both federal and state budgets.
Section 3 provides for retroactive reimbursement without clear criteria for approval, which introduces budgetary uncertainties and potential fiscal impacts that are not planned for, posing a major financial and legal issue.
The broad language in Section 2 regarding 'State and local governments' does not clarify how funds will be distributed or prioritized, leading to potential favoritism or imbalance between different regions.
The absence of a specific mechanism or criteria for auditing or verifying the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities to be reimbursed in Section 2 creates opportunities for inefficiencies or misuse, raising ethical and financial concerns.
Section 3 lacks a defined reimbursement period as the 'effective date of this section' is ambiguous, adding to potential legal confusion and inconsistent application of the law.
In Section 2, the language 'may utilize, with their consent, on a reimbursable basis' is considered vague and lacks clear terms and conditions, which could lead to misunderstandings or disputes related to consent and reimbursement.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Presidential Security Resources Reimbursement Act of 2025 is the title of this legislative act, as stated in Section 1.
2. Authorization for reimbursement of State and local governments for the use of services, personnel, equipment, and facilities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to Section 3056 of title 18 allows the Secretary of Homeland Security to use and pay for state and local government services, personnel, equipment, and facilities, as long as they agree to it.
3. Retroactive application Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of Homeland Security is allowed to reimburse state and local governments for their services, personnel, equipment, and facilities used between July 12, 2024, and when this law becomes effective, in relation to specific duties under section 3056(a) of title 18 of the United States Code.