Overview

Title

To prevent and address intentional misuse of subrecipient TANF funds.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 2108 is a plan to stop people from using certain government money in the wrong way. It wants to create a team to watch over this money and make sure it's used correctly, and if someone uses it wrongly on purpose, they might have to pay extra penalties.

Summary AI

H. R. 2108 aims to tackle and prevent the intentional misuse of TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families) funds by subrecipients. The bill proposes the creation of a TANF Program Integrity Unit to monitor the use of these funds and calls for additional penalties if funds are intentionally misused. The Secretary of Health and Human Services is given the authority to establish state plan requirements for monitoring these funds and must report annually to Congress on related activities. The bill also mandates that within two years after its enactment, rules must be proposed to implement these changes.

Published

2025-03-14
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-03-14
Package ID: BILLS-119hr2108ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
912
Pages:
5
Sentences:
15

Language

Nouns: 265
Verbs: 74
Adjectives: 41
Adverbs: 5
Numbers: 30
Entities: 69

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.08
Average Sentence Length:
60.80
Token Entropy:
4.92
Readability (ARI):
31.54

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

H. R. 2108, titled the "TANF State Expenditure Integrity Act of 2025," is a proposed piece of legislation in the United States Congress. Its primary aim is to prevent and address the intentional misuse of funds allocated to subrecipients under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. The bill seeks to provide the Secretary of Health and Human Services with enhanced authority to monitor these funds, establish a new Program Integrity Unit within the Administration for Children & Families, and impose penalties on states that misuse funds. Additionally, the bill outlines requirements for states to compensate for misused funds by spending equivalent amounts on direct cash assistance for low-income families.

Summary of Significant Issues

The bill raises several significant issues worth noting:

  1. Broad Authority and Financial Concerns: The Secretary is granted considerable authority to develop compliance frameworks. Without proper management, this authority could lead to wasteful spending. This raises critical concerns regarding both financial oversight and regulatory efficacy.

  2. Financial Burden on States: By requiring states to match any misused funds, the bill could impose significant financial burdens on state budgets. This requirement may affect the funding and operation of other vital state programs, potentially resulting in negative implications for state-level services.

  3. Vague Language: Terms such as "program integrity" and "intentional misuse" are not clearly defined, which could lead to varied interpretations and inconsistent enforcement of the bill's provisions.

  4. Fiscal Implications: The allocation of an additional $10 million per year for the TANF Program Integrity Unit could be viewed as excessive if detailed justifications are not provided, creating concerns about the efficient use of taxpayer dollars.

  5. Implementation Timelines: The delay of up to two years for the publication of rulemaking notices and the dependency on specific calendar quarters or fiscal years for the bill's effective date might hinder timely implementation and oversight.

Impact on the Public

Broadly speaking, the bill's impact on the public can be two-fold. Positively, by enhancing mechanisms to prevent and address the misuse of TANF funds, the bill aims to ensure that financial assistance reaches its intended recipients—low-income families who rely on such aid to meet basic needs. This could enhance trust in public assistance programs and ensure that taxpayer money is used appropriately.

However, the financial burdens imposed on states could have adverse effects. If states struggle to match misused funds, they may need to divert resources from other critical services, potentially affecting broader public welfare. Additionally, if the new requirements result in increased administrative costs or delays in fund distribution, vulnerable families might not receive timely benefits.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For state governments, the bill presents a challenging landscape. While it prioritizes the integrity of TANF funding, it also mandates that states assume financial responsibility for any misused funds. This could necessitate re-evaluation of financial planning and possibly affect other budgetary allocations. There is a potential strain on state resources, which may require states to adjust priorities or seek additional revenue streams.

For federal oversight bodies, the establishment of a new Program Integrity Unit could reinforce efforts to safeguard TANF funds. However, it also presents a challenge regarding the effective management and justification of additional budget allocations, emphasizing the need for transparent processes and demonstrable outcomes.

In summary, while H. R. 2108 aims to bolster the integrity of the TANF program, it brings significant challenges that require careful consideration and management to ensure that its goals are met without unintended negative consequences.

Financial Assessment

Summary of Financial Allocations

The bill, H.R. 2108, addresses the misuse of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) funds by allocating financial resources to enhance monitoring and enforcement. It mandates an increase in funding by $10,000,000 each fiscal year specifically for staffing and operations of the newly established TANF Program Integrity Unit within the Administration for Children & Families. This funding aims to support enhanced oversight measures to detect and address intentional misuse of funds by subrecipients.

Relation to Identified Issues

One identified issue pertains to the potential for wasteful spending due to the substantial authority given to the Secretary of Health and Human Services to develop compliance frameworks. The $10,000,000 annual increase could be seen as excessive unless there is a detailed justification of how these funds will be effectively utilized to monitor compliance without unnecessary expenditures. The concern here is ensuring transparency and accountability in how taxpayer money is allocated and spent.

Another issue is the financial burden on states resulting from the provision requiring them to match misused funds with their own expenditures. This requirement could strain state budgets, as it mandates additional spending by states equal to the misused amount. This means states might have to redirect resources, potentially affecting their ability to fund other essential programs.

The timeline for rulemaking, which suggests up to two years for implementation, could delay necessary oversight mechanisms. During this period, the continued allocation of $10,000,000 annually towards the TANF Program Integrity Unit's operations might not be immediately effective in preventing misuse, raising concerns about interim expenditures without tangible outcomes.

Additionally, the lack of clear definitions for terms like "program integrity" and "intentional misuse" might lead to varied interpretations, affecting consistent enforcement and possibly resulting in ineffective spending if funds are allocated without clear objectives.

In summary, while the financial allocations under this bill are aimed at strengthening oversight and reducing misuse of TANF funds, they raise several concerns regarding their implementation and impact on broader fiscal responsibilities at both federal and state levels. The necessity for substantial oversight funding, balanced against the need for transparency and efficiency, is a critical aspect of this legislation.

Issues

  • The broad authority given to the Secretary in Section 2 to develop and monitor compliance frameworks could lead to wasteful spending if not properly managed. This issue is significant from both a financial and regulatory perspective, as it requires thorough checks and transparent procedures to avoid misuse of funds.

  • The provision in Section 2 requiring states to match any misused funds with their own expenditures could impose significant financial burdens on state budgets. This could strain state resources and affect the funding and execution of other critical state programs, posing a legal and financial challenge.

  • The language used in Section 2, such as 'program integrity' and 'intentional misuse,' is vague, potentially leading to varied interpretations and inconsistent enforcement. This has legal and regulatory implications, as clear definitions are necessary for effective compliance and enforcement.

  • The increase of $10,000,000 per fiscal year for the TANF Program Integrity Unit's staffing and operations in Section 2 might be considered excessive without a detailed justification. This raises financial concerns about effective allocation and use of taxpayer money.

  • The timeframe of up to two years for the publication of notice of rulemaking in Section 2(c) might delay the implementation of necessary oversight measures, potentially allowing misuse to continue in the interim. This delay could be politically and ethically contentious.

  • The effective date's dependency on a specific calendar quarter or fiscal year in Section 2(d) could lead to confusion or misalignment with state budgeting cycles and planning. This could pose operational challenges and affect timely implementation.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the act introduces its short title, which is called the “TANF State Expenditure Integrity Act of 2025.”

2. Authority to prevent and address intentional misuse of subrecipient funds under the TANF program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Social Security Act to give the Secretary of Health and Human Services authority to monitor and prevent the misuse of funds under the TANF program, including creating a new Program Integrity Unit with a $10 million budget increase. If funds are intentionally misused, the state must compensate by spending an equivalent amount on cash assistance for low-income families, and these changes will take effect after a specified timeline following the bill's enactment.

Money References

  • “(B) APPROPRIATION.—Out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the amount made available in section 403(a)(1)(C) for each fiscal year shall be increased by $10,000,000, and the amount of the increase shall be available for the staffing and operations of the TANF Program Integrity Unit and related functions.