Overview
Title
To prohibit Federal funds from being made available to international financial institutions for the purposes of financing foreign shrimp farms, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill is like a rule that stops the government from giving money to help farms in other countries grow shrimp. It also makes sure that people who work with world money banks do not support making more of something than people want.
Summary AI
H.R. 2071, titled the "Save Our Shrimpers Act," aims to prevent federal funds from being used by international financial institutions to support shrimp farming, processing, or exporting activities in foreign countries. The bill mandates that the Secretary of the Treasury ensure federal funds are not allocated for these purposes. Additionally, it requires the Comptroller General to report annually to Congress on the compliance of U.S. representatives at certain international financial institutions to oppose funding for commodities or minerals that exceed world market demands.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
H.R. 2071, titled the "Save Our Shrimpers Act," is a legislative proposal before the 119th Congress, aimed at preventing federal funds from being allocated to international financial institutions for the purpose of supporting shrimp farming activities in foreign countries. Introduced in the House of Representatives on March 11, 2025, the bill implies a targeted economic restriction, particularly affecting foreign shrimp farms by denying them indirect financial backing from the United States. Additionally, the bill mandates an annual report by the Comptroller General to Congress on the compliance of U.S. Executive Directors at certain international financial institutions regarding existing instructions that discourage support for surplus export commodities or minerals.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the key issues surrounding the bill is its seeming lack of clarity and justification in targeting shrimp farming specifically. The prohibition in Section 2 does not clearly define what activities related to shrimp farming are included, which could lead to varied interpretations and enforcement challenges. This ambiguity may create legal uncertainties, complicating efforts to ensure compliance.
Likewise, Section 3 requires an annual report on compliance with certain financial aid restrictions, but it references other legislative documents which might not be readily accessible, potentially making the scope of the investigation unclear. Furthermore, the language of the bill is perceived as complex and lacks specific consequences for non-compliance, which could undermine the bill's intended effectiveness.
Impact on the Public at Large
Broadly, the bill could have mixed impacts on the public. The proposed restrictions may align with interests aimed at protecting domestic shrimping businesses by avoiding competition from foreign operations benefiting indirectly from U.S. funds. However, such measures might also limit international cooperation in agriculture and income for those relying on international trade channels.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For domestic shrimpers, the bill could be seen as a positive development, potentially reducing foreign competition and preserving local industry employment. Conversely, stakeholders such as foreign shrimp farmers and related industries may experience adverse effects due to reduced financial support, potentially affecting their livelihoods and economic stability in their regions.
Furthermore, unintended repercussions could arise if the distinction against shrimp farming without addressing other agricultural sectors is deemed politically or economically biased, possibly leading to trade disputes or strained international relations. International financial bodies might also find the practical application of these restrictions challenging given the bill's ambiguities, thus impeding their functional objectives in other sectors as well.
Overall, while the bill targets protective measures for domestic industry, its broader impact includes potential economic drawbacks for international partners and challenges in legislative clarity and execution.
Issues
The prohibition on Federal funds being used by international financial institutions to finance foreign shrimp farms (Section 2) could adversely impact economies that rely on these funds for shrimp farming activities. The lack of clear justification for targeting shrimp farming specifically might be seen as unfair to the industry.
Section 2 lacks a clear definition of what constitutes 'any activity relating to shrimp farming', leading to potential ambiguity in interpretation and enforcement, which could cause legal uncertainties.
Section 2's absence of criteria or rationale for singling out shrimp farming over other agricultural sectors raises concerns of discrimination against specific industries, which could be seen as politically or economically motivated.
The report requirement in Section 3 does not clearly specify which international financial institutions are covered, only referencing 'institutions specified in section 22 of the Export-Import Bank Act Amendments of 1986', which could lead to confusion about the scope of the investigation.
Since Section 3 relies on references to external documents, it could complicate understanding and compliance, making the report less accessible to those unfamiliar with the prior legislation.
Section 3's report language could be considered overly complex, potentially reducing comprehensibility and effectiveness in enforcing compliance, and may result in duplicative oversight if similar monitoring already exists.
Section 3 does not specify the consequences of non-compliance by the United States Executive Directors, which could undermine the effectiveness of the legislative intent to enforce these policies.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this act states that it will be called the “Save Our Shrimpers Act.”
2. Prohibition on making Federal funds available to international financial institutions to finance foreign shrimp farms Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section prohibits the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury from giving federal funds to international financial institutions if those funds would be used for shrimp farming activities, such as farming, processing, or exporting shrimp in other countries.
3. Annual GAO report on compliance by the United States Executive Directors at certain international financial institutions with instruction to oppose international financial institution assistance for the production or extraction of export commodities or minerals in surplus on world markets Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Comptroller General to investigate and report annually to Congress on how well the United States Executive Directors at certain international financial institutions are following instructions to oppose financial assistance for producing or extracting surplus export commodities or minerals. This report must first be submitted within 180 days after the law is enacted.