Overview
Title
An Act To require that the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior submit accurate reports regarding hazardous fuels reduction activities, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 204, the ACRES Act, is a rule that asks two important leaders to tell everyone each year about how they are cleaning up dangerous stuff in forests to help prevent fires. They need to explain what they did, how much it cost, and how well it worked, but they have to do this without getting any extra money to help.
Summary AI
H. R. 204, titled the Accurately Counting Risk Elimination Solutions Act (ACRES Act), mandates that the Secretaries of Agriculture and the Interior provide detailed annual reports about hazardous fuels reduction on federal lands. These reports must include data on acres treated, costs, wildfire risk levels, and effectiveness in reducing wildfire risks. The bill also requires the establishment of standardized procedures for data tracking and a Government Accountability Office (GAO) study to review implementation progress. No additional funding is authorized for these activities, relying instead on existing appropriations.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The U.S. Congress has introduced a bill titled the “Accurately Counting Risk Elimination Solutions Act” or the “ACRES Act.” This legislation aims to ensure that the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior submit accurate and detailed reports on hazardous fuels reduction activities. These activities are essential for managing vegetation to reduce the risk of wildfires. The bill mandates detailing the number of acres treated, wildfire risk levels, types of activities undertaken, costs, and other relevant factors in the reports. It also requires these reports to be made publicly accessible. However, the act specifies that no additional funds are authorized for implementing these requirements.
General Summary
The ACRES Act is designed to improve transparency and accountability regarding hazardous fuels reduction efforts on federal lands. By requiring more detailed reporting, the act seeks to enable better oversight and understanding of how these activities are performed and their effectiveness in reducing wildfire risks. Every year, the secretaries involved must prepare these detailed reports and ensure they are available to the public.
Summary of Significant Issues
One notable issue with the ACRES Act is that it does not authorize any additional funding for these activities, which could limit the ability of the departments involved to meet the new reporting requirements effectively. This lack of funding could lead to insufficient execution or accuracy in the reports. Moreover, the bill introduces potentially complex reporting requirements that demand tracking various factors, which may pose implementation challenges without adequate resources.
Another concern lies in the lack of specifics regarding the format and timing for making the reports publicly available, which might affect transparency efforts. Furthermore, the procedures for distinguishing between different geographic zones, particularly the wildland-urban interface, are somewhat ambiguous and could result in inconsistent data. Additionally, while the bill mandates a GAO study to assess the implementation of these requirements two years post-enactment, it does not require any interim evaluations, possibly delaying the identification and resolution of issues.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
The broader public might benefit from the ACRES Act in terms of greater transparency and insights into how public lands are managed to mitigate wildfire risks. Enhanced reporting could potentially lead to better strategies and more informed decision-making regarding wildfire management. However, if the requirements place too much strain on available resources without corresponding increases in funding, the actual implementation might fall short, negating potential public benefits.
For specific stakeholders, such as the Department of Agriculture and the Department of the Interior, the act could introduce additional administrative burdens. Developing and adhering to new reporting standards without extra funding might stretch existing resources thin, possibly affecting their other responsibilities. Conversely, stakeholders in wildfire-prone areas might find reassurance in increased reporting transparency, allowing them to gauge how effectively their risks are being managed. Nonetheless, the varied and potentially complex reporting requirements could lead to inefficient or inaccurate portrayals of activities if not adequately supported—potentially impacting public perception negatively.
In conclusion, while the ACRES Act has commendable goals for improving wildfire risk management on federal lands, the lack of authorized funding and potential challenges with reporting complexity could impact its efficacy. Proper execution will be crucial to realizing the benefits envisaged by the legislation.
Issues
The act does not authorize additional funds for implementing the requirements set forth, which may limit the resources available to effectively execute and report on hazardous fuels reduction activities (Section 2, e).
There is potential complexity in reporting requirements due to the need to track and report diverse factors such as types of activities, cost per acre, location, and effectiveness. This complexity may pose implementation challenges without additional resources (Section 2, a).
The lack of specification on the format or timelines for publication of reports may lead to delays or inconsistencies in public access, potentially hindering transparency despite the requirement for public availability (Section 2, a, 3).
Ambiguity exists around methods for distinguishing between acres within and outside the wildland-urban interface in data collection, potentially resulting in inconsistent data reporting (Section 2, b, 2, D).
The act requires a GAO study two years after enactment to evaluate implementation but does not provide for interim reporting or assessment, which could delay the identification of issues or effectiveness until after this period (Section 2, c).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that the official short title of the legislation is the “Accurately Counting Risk Elimination Solutions Act,” abbreviated as the “ACRES Act.”
2. Accurate Hazardous Fuels Reduction Reports Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill requires the Secretary of Agriculture or the Interior to include reports on hazardous fuels reduction activities in the President's budget materials, detailing acres treated, wildfire risk, and costs, and to make these reports public. It also mandates standardized procedures for data collection to ensure the accuracy of these reports and directs the Comptroller General to study the implementation of the requirements. No additional funding is authorized for these activities.