Overview
Title
To amend title 46, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Transportation to ensure that all cargoes procured, furnished, or financed by the Department of Transportation are transported on privately-owned commercial vessels of the United States, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to make sure that the ships carrying goods paid for by the U.S. Department of Transportation are mostly owned by Americans, as long as they are not too expensive and are available.
Summary AI
The bill H. R. 2035, titled the “American Cargo for American Ships Act,” proposes amendments to title 46 of the United States Code. It mandates that the Secretary of Transportation ensures all cargoes procured, furnished, or financed by the Department of Transportation are transported on commercial vessels that are privately owned and registered in the United States. The bill includes an exception stipulating that this requirement applies as long as these vessels are available at fair and reasonable rates, ensuring that American ships are actively participating in the transport of goods by sea.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, known as the “American Cargo for American Ships Act,” aims to amend a section of the United States Code. Its primary focus is on ensuring that all cargo procured, furnished, or financed by the Department of Transportation uses privately-owned commercial vessels of the United States for transportation. This would apply as long as such vessels are available at fair and reasonable rates, potentially supporting the U.S. maritime industry by mandating government cargo to be transported on U.S. ships.
Summary of Significant Issues
A key issue with the bill is its stringent requirement that 100% of the government-financed cargo must be transported on U.S. vessels. This might not be feasible in situations where U.S. ships are unavailable or where foreign ships offer more competitive rates, leading to potential increases in costs and logistical inefficiencies.
The language used in the bill, especially terms like "steps necessary and practicable" and "fair and reasonable rates," are open to interpretation. This vagueness can result in inconsistent application and enforcement, potentially leading to legal disputes and challenges in compliance.
The title of the bill does not convey the specific actions or changes the bill proposes, which may cause ambiguity or confusion among the public about its objectives and implications.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill could lead to increased costs for government cargo transportation, impacting taxpayers if U.S. vessels are comparatively more expensive than available international options. This requirement could also cause delays if U.S. vessels are not readily available, affecting the timely execution of government projects.
On a positive note, the emphasis on using U.S. ships could strengthen the domestic maritime industry, potentially leading to economic benefits such as job creation within the sector.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
U.S. Maritime Industry:
The bill would likely benefit U.S. shipowners and operators by ensuring a guaranteed market for government-financed cargo. This would reinforce the economic position of U.S. vessels within the global shipping industry, potentially leading to more jobs and revenue within the sector.
International Ship Operators:
On the downside, international shipping companies might face reduced business opportunities regarding U.S. government cargo transport, potentially straining international trade relations or limiting competition in the shipping industry.
Government Agencies:
The Department of Transportation and other government agencies might encounter logistical challenges and potential cost increases. The requirement to use U.S. vessels at all times can complicate procurement processes, particularly in scenarios where domestic options are limited or more costly.
In conclusion, while the bill intends to bolster the U.S. shipping industry, it could have broad implications for government costs, efficiency, and international trade relations. Its success would heavily depend on the availability and competitiveness of U.S. shipping options, as well as the clarity and fairness of how its provisions are implemented.
Issues
The requirement for 100 percent of the equipment, materials, or commodities to be transported on U.S. vessels in Section 2 may not account for situations where such vessels are not available, potentially leading to inefficiencies or unnecessary cost increases. This issue raises concerns about possible financial burdens and logistical challenges in the enforcement of the bill.
The phrase 'steps necessary and practicable' in Section 2 is vague and open to interpretation, which could lead to inconsistent application or enforcement of the bill's requirements. This lack of clarity might result in challenges in compliance and potential legal disputes.
The clause 'to the extent those vessels are available at fair and reasonable rates' in Section 2 could be seen as subjective, leading to varying interpretations of what constitutes 'fair and reasonable rates' and potentially allowing for favoritism or bias in contracting decisions. This issue has political and ethical implications in terms of potential favoritism or discrimination.
The title 'American Cargo for American Ships Act' as stated in Section 1 does not specify what actions will be taken, which could lead to ambiguity in interpreting the legislation. The lack of specificity might cause public confusion regarding the bill's objectives and implications.
The complexity of the language used in Section 2, such as the conditionality and exceptions, may make it difficult for stakeholders to fully understand their obligations and rights without legal advice. This issue has legal and ethical dimensions, as stakeholders may not be able to comply without incurring additional costs for legal consultation.
The section only includes a short title and does not provide further context or details, making it difficult to assess related issues such as potential wasteful spending or favoritism. This issue is related to the bill structure in Section 1, which may not effectively communicate the scope and impacts of the legislation.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act states that it can be referred to as the “American Cargo for American Ships Act.”
2. Cargoes procured, furnished, or financed by United States Government Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
United States Code, title 46, section 55305 is updated to say that when the Department of Transportation uses federal funds to get certain goods and equipment, they have to try to use ships owned by U.S. companies to transport these items. This rule applies as long as those ships are available at fair prices.