Overview

Title

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to provide for the inclusion of an additional use of Byrne-JAG grant funds.

ELI5 AI

The "BODEGA Act of 2025" wants to let some special store owners use certain crime-fighting money to buy alarm buttons and cameras to make their stores safer. But some people worry that this might not be fair because it's supposed to help everyone, not just certain stores.

Summary AI

H.R. 2018, also known as the "Bodega Owner Defense Enhancement Grant Assistance Act of 2025" or the "BODEGA Act of 2025," aims to modify the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. The bill proposes to allow Byrne-JAG grant funds to be used for installing panic buttons and surveillance equipment in private businesses. Additionally, it specifies that these provisions would apply to businesses classified under the North American Industrial Classification Code 445131, which typically includes food retail and bodega-type establishments.

Published

2025-03-10
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-03-10
Package ID: BILLS-119hr2018ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
303
Pages:
2
Sentences:
8

Language

Nouns: 96
Verbs: 18
Adjectives: 6
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 18
Entities: 32

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.62
Average Sentence Length:
37.88
Token Entropy:
4.42
Readability (ARI):
17.75

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

This proposed legislation, titled the "BODEGA Act of 2025," seeks to amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. The amendment aims to incorporate new provisions that allow the use of Byrne Justice Assistance Grant (Byrne-JAG) funds for installing panic buttons and surveillance equipment in private businesses. Specifically, these businesses are identified under the classification code "445131" of the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS). Introduced by Mr. Torres of New York and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, the bill focuses on enhancing the security infrastructure of such private entities.

Summary of Significant Issues

There are several significant concerns raised by this bill:

  • Use of Public Funds for Private Businesses: The primary issue revolves around using public grant funds intended for crime control and community safety to equip private businesses with security apparatus. This raises questions about the appropriateness and alignment of such expenditures with the original intent of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968.

  • Perceived Favoritism and Clarity: The bill's title and provisions seem to focus narrowly on businesses in a specific classification, potentially indicating favoritism toward certain private enterprises. The lack of detailed explanation regarding the "445131" classification may lead to confusion among those unfamiliar with NAICS codes.

  • Lack of Transparency: The bill does not provide a detailed explanation or justification for why these particular businesses are singled out for assistance, which can lead to accusations of unequal treatment unless further context is given.

Potential Impacts on the Public and Stakeholders

General Public Impact:
For the general public, this bill could raise concerns about transparency and the use of taxpayer money, particularly focusing on private benefits derived from public funds. It introduces a discourse about the role of public funding in private enterprise security, pressing a broader conversation about public safety priorities.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders:

  • Bodega Owners and Similar Businesses: These stakeholders stand to benefit directly from the bill as they could receive funding to enhance their security measures. However, there might be an expectation of explaining how they were selected and the broader implications for enterprises outside this classification.

  • Other Private Businesses: Entities not falling under the specified NAICS code might view this initiative as preferential treatment, which could lead to calls for broader inclusivity or clearer criteria for eligibility.

  • Public Safety and Community Advocates: These groups might scrutinize the bill for deviating from the core mission of enhancing community safety, originally envisioned for the Byrne-JAG funds. They may argue that resources should remain focused on direct crime prevention activities rather than switching to supporting private measures.

In conclusion, while the BODEGA Act of 2025 offers tangible benefits for certain private businesses in need of enhanced security, it raises critical debates about the allocation of federal grant funds and the roles of public versus private contributions to safety initiatives. The bill highlights the challenge of balancing focused support for vulnerable businesses with the equitable deployment of public resources.

Issues

  • The inclusion of 'panic buttons' and 'surveillance equipment' for private businesses as a legitimate use of Byrne-JAG grant funds in Section 2 raises concerns about whether such expenditures align with the original purpose of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, which may lead to perceptions of misallocation of funds intended for public safety and crime control.

  • The act's title, 'Bodega Owner Defense Enhancement Grant Assistance Act of 2025,' suggests financing an initiative specifically for bodega owners without a clear justification. This could be viewed as favoritism, as indicated in Section 1, unless further context is provided.

  • The mention of 'private businesses that are classified under the North American Industrial Classification Code 445131' in Section 2 could be seen as beneficial to a specific business category without clarification, raising concerns about potential inequity in grant disbursement.

  • The lack of detailed explanation regarding the North American Industrial Classification Code 445131 in the bill text could lead to misunderstandings or misinterpretations about eligible businesses, as noted in Section 2, especially among those unfamiliar with such classification systems.

  • Section 1 lacks detail about the act’s provisions, making it difficult to fully evaluate potential instances of wasteful spending or favoritism, as well as to assess whether the title accurately reflects the bill's broader implications.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill is about the short title, which states that the act can be referred to as the “Bodega Owner Defense Enhancement Grant Assistance Act of 2025” or simply the “BODEGA Act of 2025.”

2. Inclusion of additional use of grant amounts Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to allow grant money to be used for installing panic buttons and surveillance equipment in private businesses, specifically those classified under the North American Industrial Classification Code 445131.