Overview

Title

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize a grant program for addressing dental workforce needs.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 2001 is a plan to give more money each year to help teach dentists and keep them working so people can get their teeth fixed. It wants to make sure there's enough money from 2026 to 2030 without rushing to spend it all at once.

Summary AI

H. R. 2001 seeks to change the Public Health Service Act by renewing a grant program that addresses the needs of the dental workforce in the United States. Specifically, it proposes increasing the funding to $15 million annually for the fiscal years 2026 through 2030. This funding remains available until it is fully used, ensuring continued support for dental workforce programs.

Published

2025-03-10
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-03-10
Package ID: BILLS-119hr2001ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
1
Words:
174
Pages:
1
Sentences:
5

Language

Nouns: 57
Verbs: 15
Adjectives: 7
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 11
Entities: 21

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.32
Average Sentence Length:
34.80
Token Entropy:
4.39
Readability (ARI):
19.71

AnalysisAI

The proposed bill, known as H.R. 2001, seeks to amend the Public Health Service Act. The key focus of this legislation is to reauthorize a grant program that addresses dental workforce needs across the United States. This bill proposes an increase in the allocated budget for said grants from $13,903,000 to $15,000,000 annually, covering fiscal years 2026 through 2030. Notably, the funds are set to remain available until they are completely expended.

General Summary

The objective of H.R. 2001 is to boost financial support for initiatives related to dental workforce needs. Increasing the budget allocation means that future programs related to dental health have the potential for enhanced resources. However, the bill as it stands does not provide specifics on how these funds are to be used or what projects they are intended to support. The legislation will impact fiscal years 2026 to 2030, leaving a noticeable gap in funding details for the years 2024 and 2025.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several issues stand out with this proposed legislation:

  • Lack of Justification for Budget Increase: The bill increases the annual budget without providing reasoning or justification supporting this change. This raises questions about fiscal responsibility and the effective allocation of additional funds.

  • Undefined Use of Funds: There is no specification of the use or goals of the funding, which opens the possibility of misuse or ineffective allocation of the increased budget.

  • Funding Gaps: Important years, specifically 2024 and 2025, are not addressed within the bill, potentially leaving ongoing programs without financial support during these periods.

  • Funds Availability Duration: By allowing funds to remain available until expended, the bill omits any timeframe for expenditure, which could lead to fiscal inefficiencies and delayed program implementation.

  • Oversight and Transparency: The absence of specific oversight or reporting requirements within the bill could lead to accountability and transparency issues regarding how the funds are managed and utilized.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Implementing this bill could positively impact the public by ensuring more robust funding for dental health initiatives. This potentially translates to better access to dental care, possibly addressing shortages in dental professionals in underserved areas. However, without clarity on fund use, the public might not fully benefit if funds are not directed toward impactful projects.

On the stakeholders' side, organizations and entities involved in dental education and workforce development may see a positive impact due to increased funding availability. Nonetheless, the lack of specific oversight raises concerns about how effectively these stakeholders can leverage the funds for maximum benefit.

Conversely, the general government and taxpayers face risks associated with the lack of transparencies, such as misallocation or ineffective use of funds, especially since financial accountability measures appear to be weak. Gaps in funding for the years 2024 and 2025 may disrupt ongoing programs or initiate administrative challenges for establishments reliant on consistent funding streams.

In summary, while the intent behind H.R. 2001 to enhance support for dental workforce needs is clear, the implementation of its provisions could benefit significantly from further development, ensuring not only better fiscal accountability but also more transparent, effective use of taxpayer dollars.

Financial Assessment

The bill H. R. 2001 proposes an amendment to the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize a grant program focused on the dental workforce needs in the United States. A key component of this amendment is the financial allocation outlined in the bill.

Financial Summary:

The amendment suggests increasing the funding from $13,903,000 to $15,000,000 per fiscal year. This increased funding is intended for fiscal years 2026 through 2030. Importantly, the provision states that this funding will "remain available until expended," meaning that there is no strict annual deadline to spend these funds, allowing for greater flexibility in their use.

Relation to Identified Issues:

  1. Budget Increase Without Justification: The amendment includes an increase in annual funding from $13,903,000 to $15,000,000, but it does not provide a clear justification for why this increase is necessary. This lack of explanation could raise concerns regarding fiscal accountability, as stakeholders may question the need for additional funds without specific reasons or a breakdown of how the additional funds will benefit the dental workforce program.

  2. Potential Misuse or Misallocation: While the bill outlines the increased funding, it does not specify how these funds should be utilized. This absence of detailed guidance could potentially lead to misuse or misallocation, as there is no mention of specific goals or targeted outcomes for this funding. Without clear directives, there is a risk that the funds may not be used effectively to meet the intended needs.

  3. Funding Gap: The amendment extends funding only for fiscal years 2026 through 2030, leaving a gap for the fiscal years 2024 and 2025. This gap could disrupt ongoing programs or initiatives if current funding runs out before the new funding begins, causing uncertainties in program continuity and effectiveness.

  4. Use of Funds and Accountability: By allowing the funds to "remain available until expended," the amendment introduces a degree of flexibility that could be beneficial for long-term planning. However, this provision also raises potential concerns about delayed expenditure and fiscal accountability. Without a timeframe for when the funds should be used, there may be less motivation to promptly utilize the funding to address urgent workforce needs.

  5. Lack of Oversight: The bill does not include any specific mechanisms for oversight or regular reporting on fund usage. This lack of transparency could lead to ineffective use of appropriated funds, as there is no system in place to regularly assess whether the funding is achieving its intended goals or to make adjustments as needed.

In summary, while H. R. 2001 proposes an increase in financial support for dental workforce needs, it also raises several concerns related to fiscal accountability, potential misuse, and the lack of oversight and transparency in funding use. These aspects are crucial to ensuring that the financial resources allocated effectively contribute to addressing identified workforce needs.

Issues

  • The amendment increases the allocated budget for each fiscal year from $13,903,000 to $15,000,000 without providing a justification for this increase, which raises fiscal accountability concerns (Section 1).

  • The lack of specificity in the intended use or goals for the increased funding could lead to potential misuse or misallocation of funds, creating ethical and financial risks (Section 1).

  • The bill extends funding allocation to fiscal years 2026 through 2030 but does not address funding for the gap years 2024 and 2025, which could disrupt ongoing programs or initiatives (Section 1).

  • The provision allowing funds to 'remain available until expended' could result in delayed use of funds and issues with fiscal accountability, as there are no time-based constraints on expenditure (Section 1).

  • There is an absence of oversight or reporting requirements within the bill, leading to potential transparency concerns and ineffective use of appropriated funds (Section 1).

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Action for Dental Health Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines an amendment to the Public Health Service Act, which changes the funding for dental health actions. It increases the allotment from $13,903,000 to $15,000,000 for each fiscal year from 2026 to 2030, and these funds will remain available until they are fully spent.

Money References

  • Section 340G(f) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 256g(f)) is amended by striking “$13,903,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023” and inserting “$15,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030, to remain available until expended”.