Overview
Title
To direct the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress reports on the feasibility of installing traffic alert and collision avoidance systems and automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast IN capabilities in all military rotary-wing aircraft, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants the military to look at putting special systems in helicopters so they don't bump into each other in the sky. If it's too hard or too expensive, they have to suggest other ideas.
Summary AI
H.R. 1898, titled the "Military Helicopter Training Safety Act of 2025", requires the Secretary of Defense to report to Congress on the feasibility of installing traffic alert and collision avoidance systems and automatic dependent surveillance capabilities in all military helicopters. This includes examining the costs, necessary cockpit changes, and potential impacts on safety and military operations. If these systems are determined to be unfeasible, the Secretary must recommend alternative options. The reports must be submitted within 90 days of the bill's enactment.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the “Military Helicopter Training Safety Act of 2025,” aims to enhance the safety of military helicopters. It mandates the Secretary of Defense to submit reports to Congress regarding the feasibility of installing specific safety technologies on all military rotary-wing aircraft. These technologies include traffic alert and collision avoidance systems, as well as automatic dependent surveillance–broadcast IN capabilities. The reports should cover analyses of costs, necessary modifications, impacts on military operations, and the effects on civilian airspace safety. Additionally, recommendations for alternative systems should be provided if installations are deemed impractical.
Key Issues
A major concern with this bill is the 90-day deadline for report submission, which may not provide adequate time for a comprehensive feasibility analysis. This rushed timeline risks resulting in reports that are not thorough or entirely accurate. Additionally, there are no specified budgetary limits or funding sources for conducting these analyses, which could potentially lead to uncontrolled expenditure.
The bill also lacks standardized methodology guidelines for conducting cost analyses in both sections, which could result in inconsistent and potentially unreliable financial assessments. Furthermore, there is an absence of clearly defined criteria for recommending alternative safety systems, leading to potential ambiguities in proposed solutions.
Technical terminology, particularly regarding the automatic dependent surveillance–broadcast IN capabilities, is used without explanation. This could lead to confusion among non-technical Congress members and the general public. Lastly, there is no mention of consequences if deadlines are missed or if reports are incomplete, which could affect accountability and transparency.
Potential Impact on the Public
Broadly, this legislation aims to increase flight safety, which could have a positive impact on public safety, particularly in areas where military and civilian aircraft share airspace. By potentially reducing the risk of mid-air collisions, both military personnel and civilian pilots and passengers stand to benefit.
Impact on Stakeholders
For military stakeholders, there might be both positive and negative implications. On the positive side, the proposed safety enhancements could improve the safety of military operations and training exercises, potentially saving lives. However, the costs and necessary changes to aircraft and training protocols could be burdensome if not well managed.
For civilian aviators and the general public, the successful implementation of these safety measures could significantly reduce the risk of airspace accidents, thereby increasing overall public safety. However, if the bill's execution is flawed—such as through poorly conducted analyses or unaccomplished modifications—these safety gains might not be realized, causing missed opportunities for improving air travel safety.
The legislation's execution could also impact defense budgets and priorities. Unanticipated costs or implementation hurdles could divert funding from other critical defense needs, requiring careful balancing of resources and objectives.
Issues
The timeline for the report submission in Sections 2 and 3 is set at 90 days after the date of enactment, which might not be sufficient time for a thorough feasibility study and analysis, potentially resulting in incomplete or rushed information.
Both Sections 2 and 3 require cost analyses but do not specify parameters or methodologies for conducting these analyses, leading to potential variability and lack of standardization in the costing process.
There are no defined budgetary limits or funding sources for the feasibility studies in Sections 2 and 3, which might result in uncontrolled spending or resource allocation issues.
The lack of specified criteria for recommending alternative systems if installations are deemed infeasible, as noted in both Sections 2 and 3, could lead to ambiguous or non-uniform recommendations.
Section 3 assumes familiarity with the technical term 'automatic dependent surveillance–broadcast IN capability' without definitions or explanations, which may hinder understanding among non-technical Congress members and the general public.
There is no mention of accountability or consequences if deadlines are not met or if the report fails to cover all enumerated stipulations in Sections 2 and 3, potentially affecting the accountability and transparency of the process.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The "Military Helicopter Training Safety Act of 2025" is the name given to this Act, as stated in the section titled "Short title."
2. Report on feasibility of installing traffic alert and collision avoidance systems in all military rotary-wing aircraft Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill requires the Secretary of Defense to report to Congress within 90 days about the feasibility of installing traffic alert and collision avoidance systems in military helicopters. The report should consider the costs, changes needed to the aircraft, impact on civilian airspace safety, effects on military operations, and possible alternatives if installation is deemed impractical.
3. Report on feasibility of installing automatic dependent surveillance–broadcast IN capabilities in all military rotary-wing aircraft Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Secretary of Defense to report to Congress within 90 days on whether it's possible to equip all military helicopters with a technology called automatic dependent surveillance–broadcast IN. The report should cover costs, effects on civilian airspace safety, necessary cockpit changes, impacts on military operations, and alternatives if such technology isn't feasible.