Overview
Title
To expand the use of open textbooks in order to achieve savings for students and improve textbook price information.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 1886, the "Affordable College Textbook Act," is like a plan to save students money on their school books by using free or low-cost online books, called open textbooks. It wants schools to get special help, like grants, to share these books with everyone in a way that's easy to find and read.
Summary AI
H.R. 1886, also known as the "Affordable College Textbook Act," proposes expanding the use of open textbooks to help save money for students and improve textbook price transparency. It sets up a grant program for institutions to promote the use of open textbooks and requires them to openly share these resources in accessible formats. The bill also modifies the Higher Education Act to include more transparency around textbook pricing and the use of open educational resources. Additionally, the bill encourages colleges to use these resources while respecting faculty's right to choose their course materials, and it mandates a future report on textbook costs.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The Affordable College Textbook Act, proposed in the 119th Congress, presents a structured initiative aimed at reducing the financial burden of textbook costs for college students by promoting the use of open educational resources. This bill seeks to introduce a grant program to aid educational institutions in creating and using free-access textbooks, potentially saving students significant money. By amending existing educational statutes, the bill also aims to improve the transparency of textbook pricing and usage policies.
General Summary
The primary aim of the bill is to make higher education more affordable by expanding the use of open textbooks, which are learning materials shared freely online. The bill proposes a grant program that encourages colleges and universities to develop these resources, fostering savings for students while ensuring quality instruction. Additionally, the bill intends to enhance textbook price information for students, making it easier for them to find affordable learning materials.
Significant Issues
A notable issue within the bill is its lack of specificity in tracking and measuring the effectiveness of the grant program on instruction and learning outcomes. Without clear guidelines on evaluation, it might become challenging to assess the program’s success. Furthermore, the bill does not include an oversight mechanism to ensure that funds are correctly used. This could result in inefficient expenditure or misuse of resources.
Another point of concern is the vagueness regarding accessibility compliance for digital content. The phrase "where feasible" could lead to inconsistent application, possibly disadvantaging students with disabilities.
The appropriation clause, which states “such sums as are necessary,” lacks financial clarity and could lead to uncertain budgetary implications. Additionally, the broad definition of "eligible entity" may create ambiguities about who can apply for the grant.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this bill could significantly alleviate one of the financial burdens associated with higher education. Open textbooks could substantially reduce costs for students, making college more accessible. However, the lack of specific oversight and detailed implementation plans might mean that the potential benefits are unevenly distributed or not realized fully.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Students stand to benefit directly from the expanded use of open textbooks. The potential cost savings could lower the overall cost of attending college, easing financial burdens on students and their families. However, students with disabilities may still face challenges if accessibility standards are not rigorously enforced.
Educational institutions and faculty might experience both positive and negative impacts. Teachers and professors would have greater access to diverse resources, allowing them to tailor educational materials to better suit their teaching methods. However, the lack of clear criteria and oversight could result in administrative hurdles or inequalities in resource distribution.
Publishers may face challenges as open educational resources become more widespread, potentially impacting their revenue from textbook sales. Meanwhile, college bookstores could see changes in their operations but also have opportunities to align with institutions in promoting affordable learning resources.
In conclusion, while the Affordable College Textbook Act has the potential to significantly benefit college students by reducing textbook costs, careful attention to its implementation details will be crucial to ensure that these benefits are realized without unintended negative consequences for other stakeholders.
Financial Assessment
The bill, H.R. 1886, known as the "Affordable College Textbook Act," seeks to create financial pathways to make college textbooks more affordable. This initiative primarily focuses on fostering the use of open educational resources (OERs) to achieve cost savings for students.
Summary of Financial References in the Bill
One of the key financial elements is the establishment of a grant program aimed at expanding the use of open textbooks. The bill authorizes the Secretary of Education to make grants to eligible entities, which include institutions of higher education and consortia of such institutions or states. Importantly, the bill specifies that these grants will be awarded on a competitive basis, designed to support projects that not only save money for students but also maintain or improve educational standards.
The term "such sums as are necessary" is used concerning appropriations for this grant program. This language means that there is no specific funding limit set for the program, potentially allowing for flexibility in funding allocation as needed. However, this lack of specificity may raise concerns about budget oversight, as identified in the issues section. Without a clear funding limit or guidelines, there is a risk of budgetary inefficiencies.
Financial Impact on Textbook Costs
The allocation of funds for grants is intended to provide financial relief to students who face high textbook costs. The bill references data from the College Board indicating that the average student budget for college books and supplies at public institutions can reach $1,290 annually. The bill posits that an expanded use of open resources could potentially save students more than a billion dollars annually. This suggests significant anticipated savings that align with the bill's aim of reducing the financial burden of textbooks on students.
Issues Related to Financial Provisions
A notable issue with the financial allocations in the bill is the unspecified nature of appropriations. The phrase "such sums as are necessary" leaves ambiguity in funding limits, which could lead to budgetary concerns and the potential for misuse of funds without clear oversight or evaluation mechanisms.
Furthermore, while the bill provides a structure for financial resources to be directed towards creating open textbooks, it lacks specificity regarding the tracking and measuring of the grant program's impact on instruction and learning outcomes. The absence of concrete metrics could complicate evaluations of financial efficacy.
Additionally, the broad definition of what constitutes an eligible entity for receiving grants could lead to ambiguities and inconsistent qualifications, affecting how financial resources are allocated and potentially creating inefficiencies or inequitable distribution of funds.
Conclusion
H.R. 1886 proposes a financial framework that seeks to reduce the cost of higher education textbooks through the allocation of grants for the development and distribution of open textbooks. While the potential financial benefits to students are substantial, the bill presents challenges in terms of budgetary oversight and the clear definition of funding guidelines. Ensuring the effective use of allocated funds will require careful administration and evaluation to realize the anticipated savings without unintended financial consequences.
Issues
The bill lacks specificity regarding the tracking and measuring of the grant program's impact on instruction and learning outcomes (Section 3). This could lead to difficulties in evaluating the success of the initiative.
There is no oversight or evaluation mechanism included in the bill to ensure that funds are used effectively and appropriately (Section 3). This could lead to inefficiencies and misuse of funds.
The requirement for digital content to conform to accessibility standards 'where feasible' is vague and may lead to non-compliance with accessibility standards, impacting students with disabilities (Section 3).
The phrase 'such sums as are necessary' in appropriations does not specify a clear funding limit or guidelines, which could lead to budgetary concerns (Section 3).
The definition of 'eligible entity' is broad and could create ambiguity in determining eligibility for the grant program (Section 3).
The broad definition of 'open educational resource' might encompass resources not intended for public sharing or modification, leading to potential copyright issues (Section 4).
There is no timeline for submitting the required report on project completion, which could lead to delays in evaluating project outcomes (Section 3).
Allowing institutions to determine the impracticability of disclosing certain textbook information might result in non-compliance with the disclosure requirements (Section 4).
Encouraging consideration of open textbooks without specifying actions or metrics might lead to inconsistent implementation and evaluation (Section 5).
The GAO report timeline of 3 years might delay potential reforms or actions related to textbook costs, leaving students financially burdened until changes are made (Section 6).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section gives the short title of the act, which is called the “Affordable College Textbook Act.”
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress recognizes that the high cost of college textbooks is a significant barrier to education and notes that while prices have increased dramatically, efforts to use open educational resources could save students money and make learning materials more accessible, especially for those with disabilities. Additionally, the government sees open resources as a way to effectively use taxpayers' money to lower financial obstacles to higher education.
Money References
- According to the College Board, during the 2024–2025 academic year, the average student budget for college books and supplies at 4-year public institutions of higher education was $1,290.
- According to the Student PIRGs, expanded use of open educational resources has the potential to save students more than a billion dollars annually.
3. Open textbook grant program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section outlines a grant program that provides funding to colleges and universities to develop and promote the use of open textbooks, which are free to access and can help students save money. The program emphasizes cooperation with faculty, quality of materials, accessibility for students with disabilities, and the sharing of resources online.
4. Textbook price information Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Higher Education Act to redefine "open educational resource" and requires colleges to provide more detailed information about textbooks and materials, including digital use terms and whether they are open educational resources. It also mandates that colleges assist bookstores with obtaining necessary course materials and offer cost-effective options to students.
5. Sense of Congress Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress expresses that colleges and universities should motivate faculty to consider using open textbooks, while respecting their right to choose the best teaching materials for their classes.
6. GAO report Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The GAO is required to submit a report to Congress, within three years of the Act's enactment, on textbook costs for college students. This report will focus on aspects like access to textbook information, publisher compliance, textbook cost changes, use of open textbooks, and the impact of these resources on education.