Overview

Title

To provide for the standardization, consolidation, and publication of data relating to public outdoor recreational use of Federal waterways among Federal land and water management agencies, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The MAPWaters Act of 2025 wants to make it easier for everyone to find information online about where they can enjoy fun activities like fishing on big rivers or lakes run by the government. It plans to make all this information from different agencies work together and be clear, while also keeping in mind the protection of special places like old ruins.

Summary AI

H.R. 187, also known as the "Modernizing Access to our Public Waters Act of 2025" or the "MAPWaters Act of 2025", is a bill aimed at improving how data about public outdoor recreational use of Federal waterways is standardized, consolidated, and shared among federal agencies. The bill requires the development of interagency standards for data compatibility, and mandates that information on waterway restrictions, fishing restrictions, and access points be digitized and made publicly available online within a set timeline. It allows cooperation with non-federal partners and ensures that the data respects existing laws regarding historic and archeological resources. Furthermore, the bill stipulates the submission of annual reports to Congress on its progress.

Published

2025-01-03
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-01-03
Package ID: BILLS-119hr187ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
7
Words:
1,896
Pages:
10
Sentences:
30

Language

Nouns: 596
Verbs: 102
Adjectives: 127
Adverbs: 19
Numbers: 64
Entities: 127

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.31
Average Sentence Length:
63.20
Token Entropy:
5.03
Readability (ARI):
33.71

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The Modernizing Access to our Public Waters Act of 2025, also known as the MAPWaters Act, is a legislative proposal aimed at facilitating better public access to data concerning recreational use of federal waterways. It mandates federal agencies to standardize, consolidate, and publish comprehensive geospatial data relating to public outdoor activities and federal restrictions on these resources. The bill outlines processes for data integration, public accessibility, and regular updates, while also establishing cooperative frameworks with non-federal entities.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several issues emerge from the proposed legislation, particularly concerning timelines, clarity, and transparency:

  • Timeline Concerns: The bill stipulates a five-year timeline for making data publicly available, which could unnecessarily delay public access to valuable information. This might impede timely community planning and public engagement in recreational activities.

  • Budget and Resource Allocation: The lack of explicit budgeting and resource allocation mentioned for the development of data standardization and publication raises concerns about potential cost overruns and inefficient spending.

  • Lack of Clarity and Oversight: Certain definitions lack precision, such as what constitutes a 'Federal fishing restriction.' The roles of the federal 'Secretaries' involved are not clearly delineated, which might complicate interagency cooperation. Moreover, insufficient accountability measures could lead to challenges in effective implementation.

  • Transparency and Public Engagement: While the bill provides for public comments on accessible data, it lacks specifics on how these comments will be addressed or integrated. Similarly, the exclusion of certain sensitive geographical information could lead to skepticism regarding the initiative's openness.

  • Selection Criteria for Partners: The absence of clear criteria for selecting nonprofit and third-party collaborators could result in favoritism, affecting transparency and fair governance.

Impact on the Public

The bill has the potential to significantly enhance the public's ability to access and understand geospatial data related to federal waterways, improving awareness and planning for outdoor recreational activities. By making such data readily available, the public could benefit from increased safety and better-prepared excursions.

However, the delayed timeline could postpone these benefits. The lack of transparency and ambiguity in certain sections might erode public trust, as stakeholders may view the initiative with skepticism if their contributions and concerns are not adequately considered.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders such as recreational and commercial fishers, the ambiguity in the definition of restrictions could lead to confusion over permissible activities, affecting their operations and planning. State and tribal agencies might experience challenges in coordination and role distribution due to undefined responsibilities among federal Secretaries.

Conversely, technology and data companies might see opportunities in partnerships with federal agencies, potentially fostering innovation and enhancing data processing capabilities. Nonprofit organizations could engage in collaborations that promote conservation and recreational access.

Overall, the bill embodies important steps toward improved public transparency and engagement with federal water resources but necessitates refinement in clarity, timelines, and partnership guidelines to ensure effective and efficient implementation.

Issues

  • The timeline for digitizing and making geographic information system data available is set to not later than 5 years in SEC. 4, which might delay public access to important information. This delay could significantly affect public access to recreational use data, potentially impacting community planning and public engagement.

  • SEC. 3 does not mention the budget or resources allocated for the development and implementation of interagency data standardization standards, raising concerns about unchecked costs and inefficient spending.

  • The potential lack of oversight in SEC. 3 due to the absence of specified accountability measures or requirements for reporting progress could result in delays or failures in the standardization and implementation process.

  • The definition of 'Federal fishing restriction' in SEC. 2 could lead to ambiguity, as it does not specify whether these are temporary or permanent restrictions, nor the nature of the restrictions. This lack of clarity might affect stakeholders involved in recreational and commercial fishing.

  • The term 'Secretaries' in SEC. 2 might lead to confusion as it refers to multiple Secretaries. The lack of clarity on collaborative roles or primary responsibilities could complicate the coordination between different departments.

  • The provision in SEC. 6 requiring reports lacks specific criteria or metrics for 'progress', making it difficult to assess the quality and effectiveness of the reporting process.

  • In SEC. 4, the provision for public comments does not specify how comments will be addressed, which could limit public influence and engagement. This lack of transparency may reduce the perceived legitimacy of the initiative.

  • The exclusion of newly digitized geographic data in SEC. 4 from disclosing information on historic, paleontological, or archaeological resources limits transparency, which might lead to public mistrust despite its intention to protect sensitive sites.

  • SEC. 5's lack of criteria for selecting 'nonprofit partners' and third-party providers could lead to favoritism or lack of transparency in partner selection, raising ethical concerns about fair collaboration processes.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that the Act will be known as the “Modernizing Access to our Public Waters Act of 2025” or the “MAPWaters Act of 2025.”

2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section of the bill, several terms are defined: a "Federal fishing restriction" refers to an area where fishing is limited or prohibited by federal agencies; a "Federal land or water management agency" includes specific federal agencies like the National Park Service and the Forest Service; a "Federal waterway" is water managed by federal secretaries; a "Federal waterway restriction" is a limitation on using federal waterways; "Secretaries" are the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior; and "State" includes all U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. territories.

3. Interagency data standardization Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretaries, in cooperation with the Federal Geographic Data Committee, must develop and implement standards to make sure different Federal databases can work together. These standards focus on sharing geospatial data about access to public outdoor areas and restrictions on fishing on Federal lands, and they must be established within 30 months of the law's enactment.

4. Data consolidation and publication Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires federal agencies to digitize and publish online data regarding restrictions and access information related to Federal waterways and fishing areas within five years. This includes details about when waterways are open or closed, specific restrictions, navigation information, and fishing regulations, and also sets guidelines for updating this data, while ensuring the protection of sensitive resource information.

5. Cooperation and coordination Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretaries can work with non-Federal agencies, private and nonprofit partners, and technology companies to support this Act, and may also collaborate with the United States Geological Survey for data-related tasks. They must comply with Federal, State, and Tribal laws when developing and distributing data, and should utilize existing data and resources wherever possible.

6. Reports Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Secretaries to submit an annual report by March 30 each year, detailing their progress in meeting the Act's requirements. These reports will be sent to various committees in both the House of Representatives and the Senate through the year 2034.

7. Effect Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section states that the Act does not change the definition of "navigable waters," affect agency authority over these waters, alter fishery management authority, or change access to outdoor recreation like hunting and fishing.