Overview

Title

To revise the authority provided to the President to impose export licensing requirements or other restrictions on the export of crude oil from the United States, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The CRUDE Act is a plan to set new rules for when the President can stop other countries from buying oil from the U.S. if it would hurt the U.S. jobs or make oil too expensive. It makes sure special leaders agree on a problem before stopping the sales.

Summary AI

The Continuing Robust and Uninhibited Drilling and Exporting Act or CRUDE Act seeks to change how the U.S. government can control the export of crude oil. It amends existing laws by outlining conditions under which oil exports could be restricted, including if they cause significant domestic economic issues like high prices or job losses. It requires that key government officials report these issues before restrictions can be imposed, and allows the President to declare a national emergency to enforce these restrictions. This bill clarifies and updates the conditions for limiting crude oil exports from the U.S.

Published

2025-03-05
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-03-05
Package ID: BILLS-119hr1850ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
269
Pages:
3
Sentences:
8

Language

Nouns: 86
Verbs: 18
Adjectives: 11
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 10
Entities: 25

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.02
Average Sentence Length:
33.62
Token Entropy:
4.41
Readability (ARI):
17.51

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

House Resolution 1850, known as the "Continuing Robust and Uninhibited Drilling and Exporting Act" or the CRUDE Act, aims to revise the authority of the President regarding the imposition of export licensing requirements and other restrictions on the export of crude oil from the United States. The bill proposes amendments to the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, specifically focusing on when and how the President can declare a national emergency due to oil shortages or price hikes.

Summary of Significant Issues

A key issue identified in the bill is the lack of clarity in the criteria used to determine "sustained material oil supply shortages" or "sustained oil prices significantly above world market levels." This ambiguity could lead to inconsistent assessments, affecting how decisions are implemented. Furthermore, the language in the bill is complex, laden with legislative terms that may be difficult for the public to grasp, potentially impacting transparency.

Another significant concern is the coordination process among the Secretaries of Defense, Energy, and Commerce. This requirement could lead to delays or conflicts, hindering timely decision-making. Moreover, the bill's assumption that crude oil exports directly cause shortages and price hikes does not account for other potential contributing factors, which could result in misguided policy.

Lastly, the criteria for declaring a national emergency are not well-defined, creating risks of subjective interpretation or misuse, which may have ethical and legal repercussions.

Impacts on the Public Broadly

The bill could have wide-reaching consequences on national energy policy and the general economy. If enacted, it could lead to stringent controls on crude oil exports, which might be intended to stabilize domestic oil supply and prices. However, unclear criteria and procedural delays could result in inconsistent application of these controls, potentially leading to market uncertainty.

For the general public, particularly consumers of oil and gas products, the bill could indirectly affect prices at the gas pump and heating costs, depending on how export restrictions influence domestic supply and demand.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Oil producers and exporters may face significant obstacles due to increased potential for export restrictions. Companies in this sector could experience reduced market opportunities and growth if the bill leads to frequent export bans. On the contrary, domestic industries reliant on stable oil prices and supply may benefit from more consistent availability and pricing, potentially leading to greater economic stability for these stakeholders.

Additionally, governmental departments, such as Defense, Energy, and Commerce, might find themselves with increased responsibilities, necessitating timely and possibly conflicting coordination in assessing oil export situations. The consumer public could benefit from more stable prices, but this hinges on effective implementation and avoidance of restrictive policies that could lead to indirect economic consequences.

In summary, while the CRUDE Act aims to regulate crude oil exports more stringently to potentially benefit domestic markets, the issues present in coordination, criteria clarity, and language complexity highlight the need for further refinement to ensure it effectively fulfils its goal without unintended negative impacts.

Issues

  • The criteria for determining 'sustained material oil supply shortages' or 'sustained oil prices significantly above world market levels' are not clearly defined in Section 2. This lack of clarity could lead to ambiguity and inconsistency in assessments and decision-making processes, potentially affecting national energy policy.

  • The language used in Section 2 is complex and filled with legislative terminology, which might be difficult for the general public to understand. Terms like 'sustained material oil supply shortages' and 'sustained material adverse employment effects' should be clarified to ensure transparency and public understanding.

  • The coordination required between the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Energy, and the Secretary of Commerce in Section 2 could lead to delays or conflicts in decision-making due to differing priorities or interpretations of the situation. This could affect the timely imposition of necessary export restrictions.

  • Section 2 assumes that the export of crude oil is a direct cause of material shortages and increased prices without considering other potential external factors that may contribute to these issues. This could result in misguided policy decisions if external factors are not adequately considered.

  • The measures or criteria for declaring a national emergency are not clearly defined in Section 2, potentially leaving it open to subjective interpretation or misuse. This could affect the ethical and legal implications of imposing export restrictions under the pretext of a national emergency.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The CRUDE Act is officially titled the "Continuing Robust and Uninhibited Drilling and Exporting Act." It is often shortened to this acronym for convenience and reference purposes.

2. Crude oil export licensing requirements and other restrictions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines amendments to the Crude Oil export licensing requirements, specifying that the Secretaries of Defense, Energy, and Commerce must jointly determine if exporting crude oil from the U.S. leads to supply shortages or significant price hikes affecting employment. If so, the President can declare a national emergency, which must be formally announced.