Overview
Title
An Act To require the Secretary of Agriculture to convey the Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site to Gila County, Arizona.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 1829 is a plan where a part of a national forest will be given to Gila County in Arizona so they can use it to help military veterans. If they stop using it for veterans, the land might go back to the government.
Summary AI
H.R. 1829 is a bill that instructs the Secretary of Agriculture to transfer the Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site, located in the Tonto National Forest, to Gila County, Arizona. The transfer must occur within 180 days if the county requests it and will include about 232.9 acres of land. Gila County will cover all costs associated with this transfer, and the land must be used to support veterans. If the land is used for other purposes, ownership can return to the United States.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislation, H. R. 1829, outlines the process by which Gila County, Arizona, could acquire a parcel of federal land known as the Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site. This site, encompassing approximately 232.9 acres located in the Tonto National Forest, would be transferred from the federal government to Gila County. The bill mandates that Gila County must utilize this land specifically to support veterans of the armed forces.
General Summary of the Bill
The bill requires the Secretary of Agriculture to transfer ownership of a designated parcel of federal land to Gila County, Arizona, upon receiving a formal request. This property includes both land and improvements, such as any buildings or infrastructure already present. Gila County is responsible for all costs associated with the transaction, including surveys, legal compliance, and environmental assessments. Notably, the bill stipulates that the land must be used to serve and support veterans. Should the land be used for purposes outside this scope, it may revert to ownership by the United States.
Summary of Significant Issues
One key issue with this bill is that the conveyance is made without financial consideration, which might be seen as a transfer of federal assets without compensation. This arrangement could raise questions about fairness and benefit to taxpayers. Another important issue is the specificity of land use; the bill mandates that the land only support veterans, yet it does not provide clear guidelines on what constitutes appropriate supporting activities or developments. This vagueness could lead to different interpretations and potential conflicts.
Additionally, the discretion granted to the Secretary of Agriculture regarding potential reversion of the land's ownership if its use deviates from the stipulated purpose could lead to inconsistent enforcement. The absence of defined timelines for required processes, such as surveys, might cause delays. Finally, the power given to the Secretary to correct "minor errors" in land mapping leaves room for ambiguity, potentially leading to disputes over what qualifies as a minor error.
Broad Public Impact
The broader impact of this bill involves the potential enhancement of services available to veterans in Gila County. Having a dedicated facility could allow for the development of programs and services tailored to veterans' needs, ranging from counseling services to community activities. However, without clear guidelines for permitted activities, the intended support might fail to materialize fully, leading to underutilized resources.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For Gila County, acquiring this property presents an opportunity to dedicate space to support veterans actively and visibly, potentially improving their quality of life. The county could benefit from increased reputation and community goodwill as a supporter of veterans. However, financial and administrative burden rests on the county to cover all acquisition costs and ensure adherence to the land use condition, which could strain resources if not properly managed.
Veterans in the region stand to benefit directly from additional resources and facilities designed to meet their needs. Nonetheless, the nature of these benefits hinges on how the county chooses to develop and use the land. Should intentions or administrative capabilities fall short, the opportunity might not be fully realized.
The federal government and taxpayers might question the fairness and financial prudence of transferring federally owned assets without compensation. The assurance that land will revert to federal ownership if misused does provide some safeguard, yet reliance on discretionary enforcement could undermine this safety net.
Overall, while the bill aims to benefit veterans in Gila County, it encapsulates several issues that need careful consideration and clarification to maximize its positive impact and ensure its successful implementation.
Issues
The conveyance is made without consideration, which might be seen as a loss of federal assets without compensation. This could be viewed as favoring Gila County without a clear benefit to the federal government or taxpayers. This issue arises under Section 1, subsection (d)(2).
The condition that the land can only be used for 'serving and supporting veterans of the Armed Forces' (Section 1, subsection (g)) lacks detailed guidance on what activities or developments are permitted, leading to potential varied interpretations and conflicts.
The discretion given to the Secretary to decide on the reversion of land use (Section 1, subsection (h)) could lead to inconsistent enforcement and challenges in uniformly applying the law if the land is not used according to the stipulated purposes.
There is a lack of specific timelines for conducting the survey and completing other processes in the conveyance (Section 1, subsection (c)(3)), which might lead to delays or disputes in execution.
While the term 'County' is defined, there might be a need for clarity on what part or office of the Gila County government is responsible for requesting and managing the conveyance, as outlined in Section 1, subsection (a).
The Secretary's power to correct 'minor errors' in the map, as described in Section 1, subsection (c)(2)(A), is somewhat vague and could lead to disputes over what constitutes a 'minor' error.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Conveyance of Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site to Gila County, Arizona Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Gila County, Arizona, can request the conveyance of the Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site from the United States, which comprises about 232.9 acres of land in the Tonto National Forest. The county must cover all associated costs, use the land to support veterans, and if the land is used for other purposes, it could revert to the United States.