Overview
Title
To amend titles 10 and 38, United States Code, to extend certain benefits to members of the National Guard who incur disabilities while performing State active duty.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 1824, called the “Supporting Disabled National Guardsmen Act,” helps members of the National Guard who get hurt while working for their state by giving them retirement and healthcare benefits. However, it makes sure these benefits don’t overlap with other benefits and depends on having enough money to pay for healthcare.
Summary AI
H. R. 1824, known as the “Supporting Disabled National Guardsmen Act,” aims to provide benefits to National Guard members who get injured while on State active duty. It modifies existing legislation to allow these members to qualify for retirement due to disability and receive health care from the Department of Veterans Affairs. The bill also ensures that any retirement pay is adjusted if it duplicates other federal or state benefits. Additionally, the provision of health care is contingent on available funding and requires individuals to exhaust other insurance options first.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill titled "Supporting Disabled National Guardsmen Act" proposes amendments to titles 10 and 38 of the United States Code. Its main objective is to extend specific benefits to members of the National Guard who suffer disabilities while on State active duty. The focus of this legislative change is twofold: modifying retirement eligibility based on disability incurred during State active duty and ensuring access to healthcare through the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for those disabled in such service.
Summary of the Bill
The bill seeks to provide National Guard members with the possibility of retirement benefits if their disabilities stem from State active duty, aligning with existing provisions for active and inactive duty. It also aims to provide access to healthcare services through the VA, subject to certain conditions. These conditions include funding availability and attempts to secure other payments first.
Significant Issues
Financial Implications and Ambiguities: Section 2 raises concerns as it introduces limitations on retired pay if benefits are duplicated through other Federal or State programs. The lack of specific criteria for what constitutes duplication might lead to inconsistent application and disputes.
Healthcare Access: Section 3 stipulates that healthcare is contingent upon congressional appropriations, which could lead to unequal access if funding is inadequate. Moreover, the requirement to exhaust all third-party claims before receiving reimbursement could delay access to necessary care.
Complexity Due to Cross-Referencing: Terms like "State active duty," defined in another section, and financial terms such as "third party" add complexity, which may confuse members trying to understand their rights and benefits.
Public Impact
Broadly, the bill aims to provide a safety net for National Guard members disabled during State duties, recognizing their service commitment at both federal and state levels. However, the potential for reduced retired pay due to perceived duplicated benefits and delays in healthcare access might dissuade members from relying on these new provisions. This could impact how effectively the bill meets its supportive goals for National Guard members.
Impact on Stakeholders
For National Guard members, the bill presents both benefits and challenges. On the positive side, it expands eligibility for retirement and healthcare services for those disabled in State active duties. However, the potential financial uncertainty with retired pay calculations and possible delays in care might negatively impact those relying on these benefits.
Veterans’ advocacy groups might see the bill as a necessary step towards parity with veterans' benefits, although they might also express concerns over the stipulations that could hinder its practical implementation. They may advocate for clearer definitions and guaranteed funding to ensure the bill effectively aids disabled guardsmen.
State governments, which often mobilize the National Guard for emergencies, might appreciate the bill's recognition of State active duty. Still, they might also face indirect pressure to ensure benefits align with this federal initiative, potentially addressing any funding shortfalls.
In conclusion, while the intent of the "Supporting Disabled National Guardsmen Act" aligns with honoring and aiding those serving at the State level, its success hinges on clear guidelines and reliable funding to avoid unintended consequences for the stakeholders it aims to support.
Issues
The limitation on retired pay based on duplicating Federal or State benefits could cause financial uncertainty for National Guard members relying on retired pay, as outlined in Section 2. This could be a significant legal and financial concern, leading to disputes over what constitutes a duplicative benefit.
The requirement for members to exhaust all third-party claims before receiving reimbursement for health care could delay necessary medical care and impose financial burdens on individuals, as highlighted in Section 3. This is a significant issue due to its potential impact on timely access to healthcare and the financial strain it might place on individuals.
The bill's reliance on terms defined in other sections, such as 'State active duty' or 'third party', adds complexity and may confuse readers, potentially leading to misinterpretations of eligibility and benefits as indicated in Sections 2 and 3. This cross-referencing could be burdensome for individuals seeking to understand their entitlements.
The provision for health care under Section 3 is contingent upon appropriations, which could result in unequal access if funding is insufficient. This creates uncertainty in the availability of benefits, thus posing a critical legal and political issue.
The use of vague terms such as 'duplicates any other Federal or State benefit' and reliance on external definitions might lead to inconsistent applications and varied interpretations of the bill's provisions, as described in Section 2. This could lead to disputes over benefit calculations, raising significant political and legal concerns.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that it can be referred to as the “Supporting Disabled National Guardsmen Act.”
2. Eligibility of a member of the National Guard for retirement from the Armed Forces based on disability incurred while performing State active duty Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amended section of the law allows National Guard members to qualify for retirement based on disabilities obtained during State active duty. It also includes a rule to reduce retirement pay if it overlaps with other federal or state benefits for the same disability.
3. Eligibility of a member of the National Guard who incurs a disability while performing State active duty for health care furnished by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Members of the National Guard who become disabled while on State active duty can receive medical care from the Department of Veterans Affairs under certain conditions. The care is only given if there is funding approved by Congress, and individuals must try other ways to get payment, like through insurance, before the VA will cover costs.
1789A. Health care for members of the National Guard who incur disabilities while performing State active duty Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Members of the National Guard who become disabled while performing State active duty can receive hospital and medical services for their disability from the Secretary, but only within the funding limits set by Congress. They may also get reimbursed for care or services from a third party, but only if all other payment options have been unsuccessfully pursued.