Overview

Title

To address and take action to prevent bullying and harassment of students.

ELI5 AI

The Safe Schools Improvement Act (H.R. 1810) is a plan to help keep kids from being bullied at school by making sure there are rules to protect everyone, no matter who they are. It wants schools to check how well these rules work and tell people how much bullying is happening, so kids can feel safer and happier.

Summary AI

The Safe Schools Improvement Act (H.R. 1810) aims to tackle bullying and harassment in schools by requiring states to establish anti-bullying policies. These policies must protect students from bullying based on characteristics such as race, gender, disability, or religion and ensure annual reporting on incidents. The act encourages the use of evidence-based discipline strategies to reduce harmful punishments that might push students out of school. It also mandates regular evaluations and reports to assess the effectiveness of these policies and their impact on reducing bullying in schools.

Published

2025-03-03
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-03-03
Package ID: BILLS-119hr1810ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
9
Words:
2,127
Pages:
9
Sentences:
64

Language

Nouns: 717
Verbs: 152
Adjectives: 132
Adverbs: 16
Numbers: 73
Entities: 198

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.28
Average Sentence Length:
33.23
Token Entropy:
5.26
Readability (ARI):
18.65

AnalysisAI

To address and take action to prevent bullying and harassment of students, the 119th Congress has introduced House Resolution 1810, also known as the “Safe Schools Improvement Act.” This bill is a response to the pervasive issue of bullying and harassment in educational settings, aiming to create a safer and more inclusive environment for students.

General Summary of the Bill

The Safe Schools Improvement Act mandates that public elementary and secondary schools receiving federal grants establish comprehensive anti-bullying policies. These policies must address behaviors that inhibit a student’s ability to benefit from educational programs due to fear or harm. Furthermore, it emphasizes the need for procedures to report and resolve incidents. The bill also requires annual reporting on such incidents and ensures the protection against discrimination, aligning with existing non-discrimination laws and ensuring free speech rights remain intact.

Significant Issues

One of the primary issues identified in the bill is the lack of enforcement mechanisms or consequences for schools that fail to comply with the stipulated policies. This lack of enforcement could weaken the compliance and overall effectiveness of the legislation. Additionally, the responsibility for conducting independent biennial evaluations is not clearly assigned, raising questions about the potential objectivity and credibility of such evaluations.

Financial implications are notably absent in the bill, leaving ambiguity about how schools will fund and implement these initiatives, which could lead to unforeseen financial strains. Moreover, the requirement for data collection and public reporting poses privacy concerns, despite assurances that individuals involved will remain unidentifiable.

Terms within the bill, like "distinguishing characteristics" and "appreciably reduced," are not clearly defined. This could lead to varied interpretations and implementations across different educational institutions, potentially undermining the bill's objectives. Also, while the bill advocates for reducing exclusionary discipline policies, it fails to provide clear alternatives, which may lead to inconsistent practices across schools.

Potential Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill aims to create safer school environments by reducing the prevalence of bullying and harassment, thus improving students' well-being and academic performance. By promoting inclusive and transparent reporting practices, the bill seeks to foster a culture of accountability within educational systems.

Positively, students who have felt marginalized or unsafe could experience an improved school climate, which might also enhance their engagement and academic success. Educators and school administrators may benefit from more structured guidelines to handle bullying and harassment, further enabling them to provide a supportive learning environment.

However, negatively, the lack of specific funding sources could burden smaller schools or those in economically disadvantaged areas, limiting their ability to fully implement the required policies. Additionally, without clear definitions and alternative disciplinary measures, schools might struggle with consistent application, potentially resulting in uneven protection for students across different regions.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For students, especially those from marginalized groups, the bill could provide stronger protections against bullying, thereby supporting their right to a safe educational environment. Parents might appreciate the increased transparency in how schools address bullying, enhancing their trust in the education system.

On the other hand, school administrators and educators could face challenges from the additional administrative duties associated with compliance and reporting requirements, particularly if they lack resources. Furthermore, if privacy concerns are not adequately addressed, there may be resistance from community members wary of potential data misuse.

The bill strives to create safer schools by addressing bullying and harassment comprehensively. Yet, without clear guidelines for enforcement, necessary funding, and well-defined terms and procedures, its success depends on the careful and consistent efforts of state and local educational agencies.

Issues

  • The bill lacks detailed enforcement mechanisms or consequences for violating anti-bullying policies as outlined in Section 4702, potentially weakening the effectiveness of policy compliance by local educational agencies.

  • Section 4704 does not specify who will conduct the independent biennial evaluation, raising concerns about the evaluation's objectivity and credibility.

  • Financial implications and budget allocations are not mentioned across several sections, including Sections 2, 3, and 4702, which may lead to potential wasteful spending or unanticipated financial burdens on local educational agencies.

  • Collection and public reporting of data on bullying incidents, as required in Section 4702, raises potential privacy concerns even though it is stated that victims or offenders should not be identifiable.

  • Many terms used in the bill, such as 'distinguishing characteristics' in Section 4702 and 'appreciably reduced' in Section 4704, are not clearly defined, leading to ambiguity and potential inconsistency in application and evaluation.

  • The bill's focus on reducing exclusionary discipline policies in Section 2 lacks clear alternatives or guidelines, which could result in uneven discipline practices across schools.

  • Section 4705 is densely written with legal jargon and cross-references other laws, making it less accessible to the general public and requiring additional research to fully understand its legal implications.

  • The deadlines for biennial reports in Section 4704, starting January 1, 2026, seem arbitrary and without contextual explanation, potentially causing concerns about the impracticality or feasibility of the timeline.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this act indicates that it can be officially referred to as the "Safe Schools Improvement Act."

2. Findings Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress recognizes that bullying and harassment create fear and hinder learning, leading to negative outcomes for students, particularly for those targeted due to characteristics such as race, gender, or sexuality. Schools with specific anti-bullying policies report fewer incidents, and Congress suggests using restorative practices and trauma-informed care to help both victims and perpetrators.

3. Safe Schools improvement Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Safe Schools Improvement Act aims to reduce bullying and harassment in public schools by requiring states receiving federal grants to enforce policies prohibiting such behavior. It mandates annual reporting of bullying incidents, ensures protections against discrimination, and clarifies that it doesn't override free speech laws or other existing anti-discrimination laws.

4701. Purpose Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The purpose of this section is to tackle issues related to bullying and harassment among students in public elementary and high schools.

4702. Anti-bullying policies Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines that states receiving certain grants must require their schools to establish anti-bullying policies. These policies should prevent discrimination and provide procedures for reporting and resolving complaints, while also collecting and publicizing data on bullying incidents without identifying any involved individuals.

4703. State reports Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The chief executive officer of a state that receives grant money must work with the state educational agency to send a report every two years to the Secretary. This report should detail information provided by local agencies in accordance with section 4702 and explain the state's plans to help local agencies address prohibited conduct as outlined in their policies.

4704. Evaluation Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary will conduct an independent evaluation every two years to assess programs aimed at reducing bullying in schools and report the results to the President and Congress. Additionally, data on bullying incidents will be collected from states for further review.

4705. Effect on other laws Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This part of the bill clarifies that it does not change any existing Federal or State laws protecting against discrimination or laws guaranteeing free speech and expression. It adds to, rather than replaces, existing rights and protections under laws like the Civil Rights Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act.

4706. Rule of construction Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section clarifies that nothing in this part of the law should prevent a state or local government from passing laws to stop bullying or harassment of students, as long as those laws don't conflict with this part of the law.