Overview
Title
To update thresholds for certain currency transaction reports and suspicious activity reports, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The Financial Reporting Threshold Modernization Act wants to change how much money people have to report when they move it around. It suggests making the report rules less strict by raising the amount of money that needs to be reported, like changing it from $10,000 to $30,000, so fewer small money movements get noticed.
Summary AI
H. R. 1799, also known as the "Financial Reporting Threshold Modernization Act," aims to update the financial thresholds for certain currency and suspicious activity reports in the United States. The bill proposes to increase the threshold for currency transaction reports from $10,000 to $30,000 and adjust these amounts for inflation every five years. It also changes the threshold for suspicious activity reports to $10,000 from $5,000 and to $3,000 from $2,000. Additionally, it updates the definition thresholds for money services businesses from $1,000 to $3,000.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
H.R. 1799, titled the "Financial Reporting Threshold Modernization Act," proposes changes to the laws governing financial reporting in the United States. Its primary aim is to update the reporting thresholds for certain currency transaction reports (CTRs) and suspicious activity reports (SARs), as well as redefine thresholds for money services businesses. The bill increases the reporting threshold for currency transactions from $10,000 to $30,000 and updates suspicious activity report thresholds from $5,000 to $10,000 and from $2,000 to $3,000. These thresholds will then be adjusted every five years based on inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
Summary of Significant Issues
One major concern with this bill is how the increase in reporting thresholds might affect financial oversight. By raising these thresholds, there could be fewer reports filed, reducing the ability of law enforcement to monitor and intercept large or suspicious transactions. This change might inadvertently make it easier for illicit activities to go undetected, potentially impacting national security and financial transparency.
Additionally, the requirement to update these thresholds every five years to reflect inflation could lead to increased administrative burdens. Financial institutions might face challenges in compliance, leading to potential economic ramifications. Also, the bill lacks transitional provisions for reports or investigations that are pending at the time of the threshold changes, possibly resulting in confusion or legal disputes.
Further, the language used in the bill might be seen as unnecessarily complex, which could complicate compliance efforts and lead to inconsistent applications from one institution to another. Lastly, there is no clear rationale provided for why these specific threshold amounts were chosen, raising questions about the potential risks to financial integrity.
Impact on the Public
The changes proposed in this bill could have widespread consequences for the general public. While the aim is to modernize reporting thresholds to reduce the burden on financial institutions, there is a risk that increasing these thresholds could diminish the effectiveness of monitoring financial transactions for illegal activities such as money laundering and financing of terrorism. This might ultimately undermine public confidence in the financial system.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For financial institutions, the bill could bring about both positive and negative outcomes. On one hand, higher thresholds might reduce the compliance burden by decreasing the number of reports they need to file. On the other hand, the recurring requirement to adjust thresholds according to inflation could increase administrative tasks and introduce new complexities into their operations.
Law enforcement and regulatory agencies could find their capabilities to track and investigate suspicious transactions hindered by reduced reporting. This might complicate efforts to address financial crimes and protect the integrity of the financial system.
In conclusion, while the intent of H.R. 1799 is to modernize financial reporting, it comes with potential challenges that require careful consideration and mitigation to avoid adverse effects on financial oversight and security.
Financial Assessment
The "Financial Reporting Threshold Modernization Act" aims to adjust financial thresholds relevant to currency and suspicious activity reports in the United States. Specifically, it proposes updating the thresholds for currency transaction reports from $10,000 to $30,000 and for suspicious activity reports from $5,000 to $10,000 and from $2,000 to $3,000. Additionally, the threshold for money services businesses is proposed to be increased from $1,000 to $3,000.
One primary concern identified is that raising these thresholds could result in fewer reports being filed, which might limit the government's ability to monitor and oversee potentially illicit financial activities. The proposed increase in the currency transaction report threshold from $10,000 to $30,000 could allow more large financial transactions to go unreported, raising potential issues with national security and financial transparency.
Furthermore, the bill mandates an adjustment to these thresholds every five years in accordance with changes in the Consumer Price Index. This requirement intends to ensure that the thresholds remain relevant by reflecting inflation. However, this adjustment could result in increased administrative costs and complexity, especially for financial institutions required to comply with the new regulations. The need for periodic updates may impose an additional operational burden, potentially leading to unintended economic impacts.
There is also concern regarding the bill's lack of transitional provisions for ongoing reports or investigations at the time these thresholds change. This gap could create legal challenges or confusion, impacting ongoing investigations or legal proceedings negatively. Similarly, the language concerning updates to suspicious activity report thresholds is considered potentially complex, increasing the risks of inconsistent application across different financial entities.
Lastly, the rationale behind choosing these specific threshold amounts is not clearly justified within the bill. This absence of a clear explanation raises questions about whether the proposed changes adequately consider all potential risks to financial integrity and whether they are the most effective means of achieving the intended goals.
In summary, while the bill aims to modernize financial reporting thresholds, its implications on oversight capacity, administrative complexity, and the rationale behind these changes require careful consideration. The goal of updating thresholds is reasonable, but ensuring effective implementation without undermining financial transparency and security remains a significant challenge.
Issues
The mandated immediate increase of the currency transaction report and suspicious activity report thresholds (e.g., CTR from $10,000 to $30,000 and SAR from $5,000 to $10,000) could reduce the number of reports filed, potentially decreasing oversight capability for large or suspicious financial transactions. This change, outlined in Section 2, might make it easier for illicit activities to go unnoticed, raising concerns about financial transparency and national security.
The requirement to update these financial thresholds every 5 years to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index, as described in Section 2, could lead to increased administrative costs and complexity. Ongoing revisions may also cause compliance burdens for financial institutions, impacting their operations and possibly leading to unintended economic consequences.
The bill in Section 2 does not address transitional provisions for pending reports or investigations at the time of the threshold changes. This absence might lead to legal challenges or confusion during the transition period, especially in ongoing investigations or legal proceedings.
The language mandating the updating of thresholds for suspicious activity reports is potentially overly complex, as outlined in Section 2, creating challenges in interpretation and implementation. This complexity may lead to inconsistent applications among different financial institutions or entities expected to comply.
There is no clear explanation or justification provided, especially in Section 2, for why these specific threshold amounts were chosen or what impact they might have on monitoring suspicious financial activities. Lack of justification raises questions about the rationale behind the changes and whether they adequately account for potential risks to financial integrity.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the official name for this law is the "Financial Reporting Threshold Modernization Act."
2. Updating thresholds for certain currency transaction reports and suspicious activity reports Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill requires that the Secretary of the Treasury and relevant federal agencies update various financial reporting thresholds to reflect changes in currency values. Specifically, thresholds for currency transaction reports are increased from $10,000 to $30,000, suspicious activity report thresholds from $5,000 to $10,000 and from $2,000 to $3,000, and the definition of money services business thresholds from $1,000 to $3,000, with adjustments for inflation every five years.
Money References
- — (1) CURRENCY TRANSACTION REPORTS.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall— (A) not later than the end of the 180-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, revise regulations issued with respect to section 5313 of title 31, United States Code, to update each $10,000 threshold amount in such regulations to $30,000; and (B) every 5 years, update each such threshold amount to reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor.
- (2) THRESHOLD FOR REPORTS RELATING TO COINS AND CURRENCY RECEIVED IN NONFINANCIAL TRADE OR BUSINESS.—Section 5331 of title 31, United States Code, is amended— (A) by striking “$10,000” each place such term appears in heading or text and inserting “$30,000”; and (B) by adding at the end the following: “(e) Updates for inflation.—Every 5 years, the Secretary of the Treasury shall update each dollar figure under this section to reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor.”. (b) Thresholds for suspicious activity reports.—Not later than the end of the 180-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, each Federal department or agency that issues regulations with respect to reports on suspicious transactions described under section 5318(g) of title 31, United States Code, shall update each $5,000 threshold amount in such regulations to $10,000 and each $2,000 threshold amount in such regulation to $3,000.
- (c) Updating the money services business definition thresholds.—Not later than the end of the 180-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall revise section 1010.100(ff) of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations, to update each $1,000 threshold amount in such regulations to $3,000.