Overview
Title
To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to establish an Abraham Accords Office within Food and Drug Administration, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to create a special office inside the FDA to work together with countries that are friends because of the Abraham Accords, helping them make sure medicines are safe and made well. But, people are worried it might make the FDA do too much by trying to help other countries, and it doesn’t say how it will pay for this new office.
Summary AI
H.R. 1794 aims to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act by creating an Abraham Accords Office within the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This office will work with countries that are part of the Abraham Accords, focusing on strengthening regulatory oversight and facilitating collaboration on medical product manufacturing. The bill outlines the establishment process, duties, and operations of this office, including providing technical assistance and sharing information. Additionally, it requires a report to Congress after three years to evaluate the office's progress and effectiveness.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
House Bill 1794, introduced during the 119th Congress, proposes the amendment of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Its main purpose is to establish an Abraham Accords Office within the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This office is intended to collaborate with countries involved in the Abraham Accords Declaration, primarily to enhance regulatory oversight and facilitate international communication regarding medical products. The bill places emphasis on strengthening regulatory practices, offering technical assistance to partner countries, and promoting convergence in regulatory requirements.
Summary of Significant Issues
A significant issue arises from the establishment of the Abraham Accords Office within the FDA. Critics argue that the agency, traditionally focused on food and drug regulation within the United States, might be overstepping into international diplomatic territories. This shift could potentially dilute the FDA’s primary responsibilities. Furthermore, the bill does not specify a budget, raising concerns over financial uncertainties that could impact other FDA priorities.
Another area of concern is the lack of clarity regarding the office’s roles and activities. The vague definition of "technical assistance" and the absence of specific, measurable outcomes could lead to inefficiencies. Moreover, setting up an office in an Abraham Accords country within two years may not adequately consider the diplomatic and logistical hurdles involved in such international endeavors.
Additionally, potential overlap with existing international functions of the FDA or other federal agencies is not addressed, which could lead to redundancy and inter-agency conflicts. There are also national security concerns about sharing regulatory pathways with other countries, which require more detailed mitigation strategies. Lastly, the reliance on the Department of State’s definition of "Abraham Accords countries" introduces variability into the office’s scope and operations.
Impact on the Public Broadly
The intended collaboration and information-sharing between the U.S. and Abraham Accord countries could lead to improved regulatory practices globally, particularly in regions that might benefit from enhanced oversight of medical products. This could lead to safer and more effective health solutions reaching international markets more efficiently, potentially benefiting global public health.
However, the diversion of FDA resources to cover these new international responsibilities might impact its domestic operations. The public might experience delays or reduced attention to FDA’s core functions, which could affect food and drug safety oversight within the United States.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For international stakeholders in the Abraham Accords countries, the establishment of this office could provide valuable technical assistance and facilitate their alignment with U.S. regulatory standards. This alignment could boost international trade in medical products and improve public health standards in these regions.
Domestic stakeholders, including the FDA itself, could face challenges. For the FDA, the additional responsibility might strain resources and affect its efficacy in its primary role. Other federal agencies with international functions could experience overlaps that require resolution and could potentially divert resources from their own missions.
For policymakers, the bill presents an opportunity to bolster international relations with Abraham Accords countries through health and regulatory collaboration. However, it also requires careful consideration of resource distribution and national interest alignment, ensuring that the FDA remains focused on its domestic mandate without overextending its commitments internationally.
Overall, while the bill sets forth a plan for international cooperation and enhanced regulatory alignment, it also raises substantial issues that require careful attention to ensure a balanced and effective implementation.
Issues
The establishment of the Abraham Accords Office within the FDA raises concerns about the agency stepping outside its primary focus of regulating food and drugs into international diplomatic territory, which could lead to a misallocation of resources and responsibilities. This is primarily discussed in Sections 2 and 1015.
The bill does not specify any budget or funding source for the operation of the Abraham Accords Office, creating potential financial uncertainties or the redeployment of resources from other FDA priorities. This concern arises in Section 2.
There is a lack of clarity in the roles and activities of the Abraham Accords Office, including the scope of 'technical assistance' provided and measurable outcomes, which might result in operational inefficiencies or overextension of commitments by the FDA. This issue is mentioned in Section 1015(c).
Establishing the office in an Abraham Accords country within two years may overlook diplomatic and logistical complexities, potentially leading to inadequate preparation time for such an international endeavor. Relevant details are in Section 2(b).
Potential overlap with existing international functions of the FDA or other federal agencies is not addressed, leading to possible inter-agency conflicts or redundant activities, as discussed in Section 2.
National security concerns may arise from sharing regulatory processes and sensitive information with nations involved in the Abraham Accords, and while these are acknowledged, detailed mitigation strategies are not provided. This is outlined in Section 1015.
The reliance on an external definition from the Department of State for 'Abraham Accords countries,' which could change over time, may affect the scope and operations of the office, as explained in Section 1015(d).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The United States-Abraham Accords Cooperation and Security Act of 2025 is the official name given to this legislative act.
2. Establishment of Abraham Accords Office within Food and Drug Administration Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill proposes the creation of an Abraham Accords Office within the Food and Drug Administration, aimed at working with countries that signed the Abraham Accords Declaration. This office will help strengthen regulatory oversight for medical products and foster collaboration between the U.S. and these countries by sharing information and providing technical assistance.
1015. Abraham Accords Office Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section establishes the Abraham Accords Office within the Food and Drug Administration to collaborate with countries involved in the Abraham Accords. This office, led by a director, will help improve regulatory practices for medical products and facilitate communication with these countries, while also aligning with national security recommendations.