Overview
Title
An Act To amend the South Pacific Tuna Act of 1988, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 1792 is a plan to make new rules about catching tuna fish in the Pacific Ocean, working closely with island countries there to make sure everyone's playing fair and sharing the fish properly, but some parts might be confusing for people who are not experts.
Summary AI
H.R. 1792 aims to amend the South Pacific Tuna Act of 1988 to update and clarify several aspects of tuna fishing regulation and cooperation with Pacific Island nations. The bill includes changes to definitions and prohibited acts related to fishing, adjusts licensing and enforcement procedures, and addresses reporting and confidentiality requirements. It also allows for technical assistance and cooperation with Pacific Island countries regarding fishing resources and operations. Additionally, the bill provides frameworks for arbitration and management of fees and penalties related to tuna fishing activities in the region.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill under consideration, titled "An Act To amend the South Pacific Tuna Act of 1988, and for other purposes," aims to update and modify several provisions related to fishing regulations in the South Pacific. This legislative effort is noted as House Resolution 1792 from the 118th Congress, second session. The bill is generally focused on refining legal language, updating procedures, and potentially altering the regulatory environment for tuna fishing in this region.
Summary of the Bill
The primary objective of the bill is to amend the South Pacific Tuna Act of 1988 by introducing changes to various sections of the existing law. These changes include updates to definitions critical for legal clarity, modification of prohibited acts and their enforcement, adjustments to licensing processes, and revisions to the role of observers and reporting requirements. Several sections also aim to provide technical assistance to Pacific Island countries. The bill further outlines changes to how fees and penalties related to fishing regulations are managed.
Significant Issues
The bill introduces some notable areas of concern, highlighted by the complex and legalistic language used, which might pose challenges to understanding for those not deeply familiar with legal texts. This complexity is pervasive across sections that discuss both criminal and civil penalties, possibly leading to ambiguous legal interpretations.
A significant point of contention lies in the sections that alter prohibited acts and penalties without clearly establishing how violations would be managed or enforced. Such vagueness might lead to inconsistent enforcement and potential difficulties in legal compliance for stakeholders.
There is also an issue around the repeal of existing sections without explicit reasoning, especially concerning technical assistance. This creates anxiety around the transparency of legislative changes and could leave gaps in the regulatory framework that might affect current oversight mechanisms.
Moreover, changes to the handling of confidential information, as mentioned in sections related to reporting requirements, suggest new protocols without a well-defined oversight mechanism, raising concerns about how information might be used or potentially mismanaged.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, this bill might not have a direct, noticeable impact as it deals primarily with the specifics of marine and fisheries law enforcement in a specialized industry context. However, the bill indirectly affects consumers by potentially impacting the tuna supply chain and prices should regulatory changes influence fishing activities significantly.
Impact on Stakeholders
For stakeholders directly involved in the tuna fishing industry, such as fishery companies and Pacific Island countries, the bill could have profound implications. Changes in licensing, enforcement, and prohibitions might increase the compliance burden for fishing companies and could influence their operational practices. The enhanced regulatory requirements could lead to increased operational costs, which might be passed on to consumers.
Pacific Island nations stand to benefit from the technical assistance provided, as suggested by the bill. However, the lack of guidance on fund allocation and management poses risks of discretionary spending, which may not always align with the nations' needs.
Conversely, regulatory changes offering flexibility, such as amendments to licensing provisions allowing discretionary application by authorities, might lead to favoritism or inconsistent practices that benefit larger companies with more resources at the potential cost to smaller operations.
In conclusion, while the bill aims to make necessary updates to the South Pacific Tuna Act of 1988, the absence of clarity in several areas raises questions about its efficacy and impact on compliance and enforcement. Enhanced clarity and oversight might be required to ensure that the bill achieves its intended objectives without unintended negative consequences for stakeholders.
Issues
The potential for ambiguity and inconsistent application of the law is present in multiple sections due to the complex, technical, and legalistic language that might be difficult for non-experts to understand, affecting sections 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10.
Section 5 repeals a previous provision without explanation, raising concerns about transparency and the potential impact on affected stakeholders, which also risks leaving gaps in legal enforcement mechanisms.
Section 4 modifies prohibited acts but does not specify the penalties or implications of violations, leaving enforcement and impact ambiguous and potentially affecting compliance and legal fairness.
Sections 11 and 12 introduce changes to confidentiality and disclosure protocols, yet do not provide sufficient criteria or oversight mechanisms to ensure transparency and accountability, potentially leading to misuse or inconsistent application regarding the treatment of confidential information.
Section 8 gives discretionary power to the Secretary and the Secretary of State to determine the forwarding of license applications without clearly defined standards, leading to potential bias and inconsistency in approvals.
The lack of specification of a budget or specific guidelines in sections 14 and 15 regarding technical assistance and financial allocations could lead to discretionary spending without proper oversight, allowing for wasteful or preferential treatment of certain entities.
Section 9 involves striking terms related to enforcement procedures, such as notice requirements and searches, without clarifying the rationale or implications, which might negatively impact legal fairness or procedural clarity.
Section 16 discusses the disposition of revenues like fees and penalties but does not specify the handling or distribution processes, leading to potential ambiguity and lack of clarity in financial management.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the "South Pacific Tuna Treaty Act of 2023" provides the official name of the Act and outlines its table of contents, listing the various sections ranging from amendments, prohibited acts, licenses, and enforcement, to specific requirements and agreements related to the Act.
2. Amendment of South Pacific Tuna Act of 1988 Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines that any references to changes or removals in this Act are meant to apply to the South Pacific Tuna Act of 1988, unless stated otherwise.
3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text outlines changes to a bill regarding definitions related to fishing laws. It updates terminology for applicable national law, closed areas, fishing activities, and fishing vessels, while also introducing the concept of "regional terms and conditions" attached to licenses.
4. Prohibited acts Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill modifies the prohibited acts section by removing certain exceptions, eliminating two paragraphs, and adding new violations, including breaking regional terms or fishing limits. It also restructures the numbering and wording in both general and licensing area regulations to align with these changes.
5. Exceptions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section explains that Section 6, designated as 16 U.S.C. 973d, will be removed from the law.
6. Criminal offenses Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Section 6 amends a part of the U.S. Code by updating which paragraphs are referenced in a previous law, changing it from referring to parts "(8), (10), (11), or (12)" to referring to parts "(6), (8), (9), or (10)" of section 5(a).
7. Civil penalties Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section of the bill amends the rules related to civil penalties by changing specific legal references and removing certain conditions for liability. It revises which prohibited acts require referral to the Attorney General and updates the language about areas closed to fishing.
8. Licenses Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section discusses amendments to regulations on vessel license applications for fishing, including allowing the Secretary to decide not to forward applications under certain circumstances, like bankruptcy or lack of insurance. It also updates how license holders can fish for tuna under the law, ensuring compliance with international agreements and conservation measures.
9. Enforcement Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section describes amendments to existing U.S. Code related to notice requirements and search and seizure procedures in legal matters with Pacific Island Parties. It specifies changes to how certain articles and clauses are referenced in section 10 of the code.
10. Findings by Secretary Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section modifies regulations related to jurisdiction and procedures for vessels in waters under the Pacific Island Party's authority. It updates references and strikes out certain terms to refine the legal framework in which vessels must operate, especially when they do not comply with the jurisdiction or are under investigation for treaty infringements.
11. Reporting requirements; disclosure of information Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the rules about keeping certain types of information confidential and specifies the conditions under which it can be shared. It states that the Secretary must keep information from the Administrator, observers, and others private unless exceptions apply, like a court order, use by federal employees for law enforcement, or with written permission from the person who provided the information.
12. Reporting Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The passage outlines rules about keeping some information secret, specifically information given to or collected by certain officials and observers. It also describes when this information can be shared, such as when ordered by a court, for law enforcement, national security, or fishery management, or if the person who provided the information agrees to the sharing.
12. Closed Area stowage requirements Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to Section 13 (16 U.S.C. 973k) removes the specific requirement that the boom must be lowered and replaces it with a provision that mandates compliance with any requirements set by the Secretary.
13. Observers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text states that Section 14 (16 U.S.C. 973l) is repealed, which means that this specific section of the law is no longer in effect.
14. Technical assistance Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section allows the Secretary and the Secretary of State to offer various types of assistance to Pacific Island countries to help them with their fisheries and fishing operations. This assistance can include technical support, training, helping with private business activities, and other suitable actions.
15. Technical assistance Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary and the Secretary of State can offer help to Pacific Island Parties to support their fisheries and fishing boat operations under the Treaty. This includes providing technical help, training opportunities, assistance with private sector projects, and any other activities they think are suitable.
15. Arbitration Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends a part of the law by removing specific references to where the arbitration is supposed to be located under certain articles, and instead specifies that the location will be determined by the Treaty itself.
16. Disposition of fees, penalties, forfeitures, and other moneys Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill changes Section 17 of a law (16 U.S.C. 973o) by removing the phrase "Article 4 of" from its current text.
17. Additional agreements Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends existing law by allowing the Secretary the authority to set up procedures for reviewing any new fishing access agreements made under the Treaty.